BURLINGTON, Vt., May 11 – U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement today after J.P. Morgan Chase revealed a $2 billion loss: “The debacle at J.P. Morgan Chase reaffirms my view that the largest six banks in this country, including J.P. Morgan Chase, which have assets equivalent to two-thirds of our GDP, must be broken up. This is important in order to bring more competition into the financial marketplace and to prevent another ‘too-big-to-fail’ bailout. “At a time when 23 million Americans are either unemployed or underemployed, huge financial institutions should not be involved in ‘making wagers or high-stake bets.’ They should be investing in the productive economy creating jobs and improving our standard of living.”

Comments (101)

  1. Posted by trojan_ | May 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM

    rabble rabble rabble

  2. Posted by guest | May 11, 2012 at 12:51 PM

    In Soviet Vermont, Sanders invests you!

  3. Posted by Indubitably | May 11, 2012 at 12:54 PM

    We need bankers to break up our bankers, so in the end your just creating more bankers

  4. Posted by Im_a_Dude | May 11, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    and free college education for all!

  5. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 1:05 PM

    Self-described "democratic socialist" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bernie_Sanders….

  6. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 1:07 PM

    Cheddar cheese > Dimon Principle

  7. Posted by stickler tickler | May 11, 2012 at 1:09 PM

    We're really defining debacle down when a $.25 hit to earnings is described as such

  8. Posted by guy is a joke | May 11, 2012 at 1:10 PM

    I've met Francois Hollande. Hell I've slept with Francois Hollande. And you sir, are no Francois Hollande. Erm, wait, you're a socialist too? I take it back.

  9. Posted by Texashedge | May 11, 2012 at 1:13 PM

    Here is a picture of Vermont's largest city:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Burlington,_Ver

    Here is a picture of the suzerainty of the banks in question:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NYC_wideangle_s

    Thanks for weighing in, Bernie

  10. Posted by larry | May 11, 2012 at 1:15 PM

    his point is that while it is 2 billion today. what if that idiot lost 25 billion?

  11. Posted by boysdontcry | May 11, 2012 at 1:17 PM

    Trust me Bernie, I am sure Jamie is very broken up about all this so you just piling on and demanding it does no one any good. More syrup on those johnny cakes? – Vito

  12. Posted by Im_a_Dude | May 11, 2012 at 1:18 PM

    Thanks Larry.
    and how much does Bernie – US govt – loose each day?

  13. Posted by PermaGuestII | May 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM

    Businesses like GMCR, you mean?

  14. Posted by Im_a_Dude | May 11, 2012 at 1:24 PM

    good point Perma. was trying to come up with some companies based in VT.
    All i had was the Vermont Teddy Bear commercials around Valentines Day

  15. Posted by guest | May 11, 2012 at 1:24 PM

    Yo dawg, I heard you like banks, so we put a bank in yo bank so you can trade while you trade.

  16. Posted by Ms.Piggy | May 11, 2012 at 1:35 PM

    that's it JD nice and slow….sticky icky..ooh wee !

  17. Posted by Grammar_quant | May 11, 2012 at 1:36 PM

    Loose like your mom?

  18. Posted by larry | May 11, 2012 at 1:44 PM

    cmon morons- are you really that dumb?

    and is a LAME mother joke the best you can do?
    If your mom wasnt under my desk choking right now even that slut would laugh at you

  19. Posted by Air Budd | May 11, 2012 at 1:46 PM

    What time are your reservations at Minettas?

  20. Posted by motives | May 11, 2012 at 1:47 PM

    who told the intern about Dealbreaker?

  21. Posted by larry | May 11, 2012 at 1:49 PM

    any whores give birth to quants

    hows that rubber doll girlfriend of yours

    AHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHHHAHHAHHA

  22. Posted by guesticles | May 11, 2012 at 1:50 PM

    BUSINESSES THAT LOSE MONEY SHOULD BE BROKEN UP

    - Bernie Sanders, aka UBS Auto Industry Quant

  23. Posted by PermaGuestII | May 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM

    JPM probably *is* too big. So are the rest of them. And sooner or later (and probably sooner rather than later) people are going to get tired of watching JPM stock go sideways (which is what it's been doing for 12+ years) and start pressing for de-conglomeratization to unlock value. Give it time.

  24. Posted by SemGroup Trader | May 11, 2012 at 1:56 PM

    That second picture shows that bridge we bought!!

  25. Posted by PermaGuestII | May 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM

    Think GMCR is about it for public companies– might be a couple of banks, not sure. Unless of course you count Unilever Ice Cream a/k/a Ben & Jerry's.

  26. Posted by John D. Rockefeller | May 11, 2012 at 2:01 PM

    I tried to corner the oil markets. Look what happened to my firm. The banks today are trying to corner the dumbass market.

  27. Posted by NJustice4all | May 11, 2012 at 2:01 PM

    reinstate Glass/Steagall – make them choose between being a commercial bank or an investment bank

  28. Posted by Whoops | May 11, 2012 at 2:05 PM

    No love for Orvis, Perma?

    -Guy who denies there's a Vermont outside of Manchester

  29. Posted by Bobby Boucher | May 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM

    No, Colonel Sanders…you're wrong.

  30. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 2:09 PM

    So you're saying Burlington has no bookstores?

  31. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 2:11 PM

    Phish

  32. Posted by Dope Rapper | May 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM

    What about Vermont Made maple syrup?

    - Silly pancake eater

  33. Posted by Texashedge | May 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM

    I'll take this a step further: we need to see this in every space. GE shouldn't be in finance, turbine manufacturing, light bulbs, and entertainment.

  34. Posted by PermaGuestII | May 11, 2012 at 2:14 PM

    Lots of love for Orvis. Was just trying to name public co's in Vermont. Plenty of privates like the Pride of the Battenkill– a railroad, a tombstone maker, three breweries and about a dozen cheese/dairy operations come to mind.

  35. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 2:24 PM

    Bu…bu….bu…….BUT SYNERGIES!

  36. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM

    Am I the only one who pauses just about every time before scrolling by "Layoffs Watch '12: Macquarie"?

  37. Posted by H.E. Pennypacker | May 11, 2012 at 2:31 PM

    Well, I've uh, I've changed my mind. I think I'm going to build a
    rollercoaster instead.

    H.E. Pennypacker

  38. Posted by PermaGuestII | May 11, 2012 at 2:31 PM

    Agreed– but GE management is too inbred/brainwashed to ever consider such a heresy– and no outside investor or investors could possibly get a big enough stake in the co. to force the board's hand.

    -guy who grew up in GE Management country i.e. Fairfield County, CT

  39. Posted by John | May 11, 2012 at 2:32 PM

    IBM has a huge facility up in Burlington

  40. Posted by Sammy P | May 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM

    Yes .. sort of like the inside of the Hindenberg was a huge facility . Luckily we off-shored most of the ear flap wearing engineering help that we had up there. Now we just store old Selectrics in the chip fab so we keep getting the tax breaks.

    – the management

  41. Posted by Nick Nailer | May 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM

    The Great State of Vermont will NOT apologize for its Cheese

  42. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM

    Picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.

  43. Posted by NowOnePerson | May 11, 2012 at 2:49 PM

    Vermont outside of Manchester? Sure there is – the 26 miles of Route 7 that reminds us where Vermont got its name and the 3 miles of 279 that allows us to deny Bennington's existence.

  44. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 2:56 PM

    Diagreed. Guy who got panicked calls from Antares in 2008 looking to unload assets because the short-term paper market looked wobbly and could see a prince or SWF forming a "strategic partnership" someday.

  45. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 3:00 PM

    Isn't Yankee Candle up there?

    - MDP

  46. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 3:03 PM

    Isn't investing in the productive economy the same thing as making a wager/bet?

    - UBS Stupid Question Quant

  47. Posted by Whoops | May 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM

    No, it's by Deerfield, MA

    -Guy who went to Deerfield

  48. Posted by Fixed Income | May 11, 2012 at 3:34 PM

    “At a time when 23 million Americans are either unemployed or underemployed, huge financial institutions should not be involved in ‘making wagers or high-stake bets.’

    So Bernie is ok with huge financial institutions "making wagers or high-stakes bets" but only when the unemployment rate is lower?

  49. Posted by guest | May 11, 2012 at 3:47 PM

    you can feel good about hood. does a dairy co-op = publicly owned…?

  50. Posted by 2 cubes over | May 11, 2012 at 3:52 PM

    how am I to know who you are? wearing anything special?

  51. Posted by fitting in | May 11, 2012 at 4:17 PM

    are there desks in zuccotti park?

  52. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM

    Just who we need to tell us how to run our businesses, a polak socialist career politician!

    -The American Public

  53. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 4:36 PM

    Car Ramrod?

  54. Posted by Guest | May 11, 2012 at 4:37 PM

    Clearly this calls for a fresh government review of debit card interchange rates.

  55. Posted by Im_a_Dude | May 11, 2012 at 4:58 PM

    Love the Magic Hat brewery # 9

    - Guy who once got shlepped up to Vt for "Fall Foliage" season by ex-gf

  56. Posted by Guest | May 13, 2012 at 7:35 PM

    This bet was made as a part of the commercial banking operations (so they say). What would Glass/Steagall done to stop it?

  57. Posted by Ron Perry | May 14, 2012 at 4:27 AM

    And you're right. rightwing freak that is.

  58. Posted by Ron Perry | May 14, 2012 at 4:29 AM

    No he's not. reading comprehension is not your forte.

  59. Posted by Fixed Income | May 16, 2012 at 12:07 PM

    I know what he wanted to say but that wasn't what he actually said. Ironic that you would be commenting on reading comprehension as you clearly missed the point.

  60. Posted by cheap bookmarking service | September 9, 2012 at 11:56 PM

    sGNu6w Hey, thanks for the article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  61. Posted by social media pros los angeles | September 12, 2012 at 12:39 PM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog post. Want more.

  62. Posted by Awesome YouTube Videos | September 12, 2012 at 8:47 PM

    Thank you ever so for you blog post. Will read on…

  63. Posted by satnam | September 12, 2012 at 10:58 PM

    I truly appreciate this article.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  64. Posted by buy backlinks | September 14, 2012 at 2:47 AM

    The author deserves for the monument:D

  65. Posted by copywriter | September 14, 2012 at 6:57 AM

    Im obliged for the post.Really thank you!

  66. Posted by Fans & Followers for your social media campaign! | September 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM

    Hey, thanks for the post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  67. Posted by diamant | September 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM

    Really informative article post.Really looking forward to read more.

  68. Posted by Meditation, Surrey, BC | September 15, 2012 at 5:41 AM

    Thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again.

  69. Posted by food for pregnant women | September 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM

    Great post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  70. Posted by Hanoman | September 15, 2012 at 6:10 PM

    I read and feel at home. Thanks the creators for a good resource..!

  71. Posted by bmx | September 17, 2012 at 3:37 PM

    I value the blog post.Really thank you! Want more.

  72. Posted by home insurance quotes | September 17, 2012 at 6:16 PM

    Very informative article post. Really Cool.

  73. Posted by current mortgage interest rates | September 17, 2012 at 7:00 PM

    Hooray! the one who wrote is a cool guy..!

  74. Posted by 1001bonnesaffaires | September 18, 2012 at 6:31 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog post. Fantastic.

  75. Posted by Zyrtec | September 19, 2012 at 9:41 AM

    Muchos Gracias for your blog article.Really thank you! Really Great.

  76. Posted by wholesale belts | September 19, 2012 at 10:53 AM

    I value the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  77. Posted by good software | September 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM

    Thanks for the blog article.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  78. Posted by how to get your boyfriend back | September 20, 2012 at 12:11 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this article post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  79. Posted by New Delhi Wedding Photographer | September 20, 2012 at 2:42 AM

    I think this is a real great article. Will read on…

  80. Posted by Vampires Movies | September 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM

    wow, awesome blog article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  81. Posted by ghosts movies | September 20, 2012 at 12:31 PM

    Major thankies for the blog. Cool.

  82. Posted by Numerology Calculator | September 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM

    Strange but true. Your resource is expensive. At least it could be sold for good money on its auction!…

  83. Posted by mortgagebrokerstore.com | September 21, 2012 at 4:32 AM

    I value the blog post.Much thanks again. Want more.

  84. Posted by hier klicken | September 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM

    Thank you ever so for you blog article.Really looking forward to read more.

  85. Posted by Buy Instagram Likes | September 21, 2012 at 5:39 PM

    Really enjoyed this blog article.Really thank you! Really Great.

  86. Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  87. Posted by Unlock the iphone 5 | September 22, 2012 at 11:35 AM

    Thanks so much for the blog article.Thanks Again.

  88. Posted by recruitment | September 22, 2012 at 4:08 PM

    Major thankies for the article. Great.

  89. Posted by buy instagram followers | September 22, 2012 at 6:03 PM

    Very good blog post. Fantastic.

  90. Posted by 000webhost review | September 22, 2012 at 7:04 PM

    Thanks a lot! An extremely interesting comment!!…

  91. Posted by turnkey adult | September 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  92. Posted by ecommerce website design | September 23, 2012 at 10:38 AM

    Muchos Gracias for your blog post. Much obliged.

  93. Posted by die cutting | September 24, 2012 at 1:33 AM

    Thanks a lot for the blog.Really looking forward to read more.

  94. Posted by Alexander Mans | September 24, 2012 at 7:10 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  95. Posted by kitchenfloors | September 24, 2012 at 11:59 AM

    Somewhere in the Internet I have already read almost the same selection of information, but anyway thanks!!…

  96. Posted by Central Humidifiers | September 25, 2012 at 2:21 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  97. Posted by Free Books Online | September 25, 2012 at 2:23 AM

    I am so grateful for your article post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  98. Posted by Uploaded.to Premium Accounts | September 25, 2012 at 12:38 PM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.

  99. Posted by digital vision board software | September 25, 2012 at 12:52 PM

    Very amusing thoughts, well told, everything is in its place:D

  100. Posted by diabetes cure | September 25, 2012 at 4:21 PM

    Thanks a lot for the article.Really thank you! Great.

  101. Posted by redirected here | September 25, 2012 at 11:57 PM

    Very informative post.Really looking forward to read more.