Despite Jamie Dimon’s promise that JPMorgan will be “solidly profitable” for the quarter, some are skeptical given the growing estimates of Whale-boy’s losses. According Mike Mayo, the bank “will only make $727 million…including $4 billion of losses in the unit that made the bungled bet [though] if the losses exceed $5 billion, JPMorgan could make an overall loss.” Barclays’ Jason Goldberg thinks things are gonna be okay here, and sees the bank making $3.3 billion, assuming you know who will have only lost it $3 billion when all is said and done. And yourselves?

Start considering your predictions now, as come July 13, there will be a visit from the Sandwich Fairy and a coveted bath toy for whoever comes closest without going over.

Will The Whale Swallow JPMorgan’s Second-Quarter Earnings [Dealbook]

Comments (19)

  1. Posted by Moby Dick | June 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM

    31.47

  2. Posted by Jamie D | June 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM

    Our recently investment in Bonobos LLP will ensure our profitability for the foreseeable future.

    -J Dimon

  3. Posted by LochnessMonsterQuant | June 29, 2012 at 3:38 PM

    bout tree fiddy

  4. Posted by UBS Math Quant | June 29, 2012 at 3:38 PM

    10π

  5. Posted by NakedShort | June 29, 2012 at 3:42 PM

    you can get a good look at a banks books by shoving a coveted bath toy up your ass

  6. Posted by T. Callahan, CFA | June 29, 2012 at 3:43 PM

    But I'd rather take Matt's words and charts for it.

  7. Posted by InfiniteGuest | June 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM

    Wait, it's gotta be your bath toy.

  8. Posted by Guest | June 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM

    GAAP net income is all that matters, right?

    -Confused sophomore finance major

  9. Posted by Guest | June 29, 2012 at 3:59 PM

    Whatever Dick Bove is predicting.

  10. Posted by Gartman | June 29, 2012 at 4:13 PM

    I know he'll be wrong.

    Hint – the giraffe knows the answer.

  11. Posted by Grinders | June 29, 2012 at 4:27 PM

    so unloved

    -*

  12. Posted by CFA Grader | June 29, 2012 at 5:15 PM

    Ummm…..
    4,727,000,000 – 4,000,000,000 = 727,000,000
    4,727,000,000 – 5,000,000,000 = (273,000,000)
    5 > 4.727
    4.727 < 5
    4.727 – 5 is a negative number. I would have to add the $ signs to be sure but it appears that there is a chance of a loss if the trade loss goes to $5B.

  13. Posted by Matt's Left Nut | June 29, 2012 at 6:06 PM

    I'd rather get jacked off with a wire brush than have that ever-growing whale up my keester.

  14. Posted by UBS MD | June 29, 2012 at 6:25 PM

    $500mm.

    -Only Guy Who Is Taking This Question Seriously Because He Is In Serious Need Of A Sandwich.

  15. Posted by guest | June 29, 2012 at 9:57 PM

    What is this in response to?

  16. Posted by UFO | June 30, 2012 at 12:01 PM

    They don't appreciate you, come work for us

    - GS "weeza be on the hunt" talent scout

  17. Posted by FromRussiaWithLove | June 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM

    Well go make one, and mow the lawn

    - his wife

  18. Posted by Guest | July 1, 2012 at 4:03 AM

    Rounding? Other than that, no concerns.

    – UBS EPS Quant

  19. Posted by Ping | July 2, 2012 at 10:23 AM

    I like your style
    - Ping.