Carl Icahn Is Unimpressed With Goldman’s Efforts To Fight Off Carl Icahn

And so he’s not paying them on principle, the principle being I suppose “don’t fuck with Carl Icahn”:

Carl Icahn says he isn’t paying a bill from Goldman Sachs Group Inc., on principle. … “These guys were hired to keep me from buying the company at $30 and they failed,” Mr. Icahn said in an interview. “But they are now demanding $18 million for having done nothing.”

Goldman’s suit says the bank “fully performed all of its obligations.”

This is about Goldman’s lawsuit against Icahn-controlled CVR Energy, which has refused to pay Goldman’s bill, and both of these statements are obviously true! CVR and Goldman signed an engagement letter to the effect of (1) Goldman will hold CVR’s collective hand because it is scared of Carl Icahn and in exchange (2) CVR will pay Goldman 0.525% of the purchase price if someone buys it (and also some money if no one does*). Hands were held, so Goldman fulfilled its end of the bargain. Icahn does not think that that was worth eighteen million dollars but it wasn’t him trembling in the night as corporate raiders circled outside his door, so he wouldn’t would he?

Anyway he’s got a point – as we discussed yesterday, Goldman was hired after Icahn had offered to buy CVR for $30, and Goldman rendered an opinion that $30 was inadequate, and Icahn ended up buying CVR for $30. So they didn’t increase the price for shareholders, or convince shareholders to take the deal, or convince them not to take the deal, or really do anything that you could value with money.** Their value added was more metaphysical: improving the terms of the contingent payment right that shareholders get, improving the structure of the deal to help non-tendering shareholders (but not enough!).***

As I said yesterday, my money’s on Goldman here: Icahn signed a Transaction Agreement with CVR Energy specifically acknowledging the Goldman engagement letter, and in fact forbidding CVR from changing it. Presumably he knew what it said, including that Goldman got $18mm if it failed to ward him off, so there’s not much of a case that either CVR Energy or Icahn should be able to get out of it now. So I don’t see him winning this lawsuit. Actually I don’t see him even really litigating it.

But I hope he does! There are tons and tons and tons of M&A lawsuits and many of them revolve around investment bank conflicts of interest and malfeasance. There is no allegation of that here. Instead, Icahn just thinks that the investment bank’s honest, honestly contracted for services aren’t worth what they charge for them. It would be a nice novelty to see a court decide that question.

Icahn Says Goldman Doesn’t Deserve Payment on CVR Energy Bill [Deal Journal]
Earlier: Goldman Surprised To Find Carl Icahn Being Kind Of A Dick

* Presumably less? The engagement letter is not filed but Goldman does say “We expect to receive fees for our services in connection with our engagement, including advisory fees that will be payable whether or not the Offer is consummated.” There is something a little weird about hiring an advisor to keep you independent and then agreeing to pay them more if they fail, but I guess paying someone more to not do a merger than to do one would be weird too. The lesson is there’s no good way to pay an investment bank, though “generously” is a good start.

** Poetic license – CVR negotiated a meaningful extension on the term of the contingent cash payment, which is worth something, and you could I guess submit it to some sort of option valuation method though, I mean, don’t.

*** For some reason I can’t resist the comparison to M&A strike lawsuits, in which plaintiffs’ lawyers almost never manage to increase the consideration that the buyer pays, but convince courts to award them fees because they’ve improved the disclosure around the deal. These fees are usually less than $18mm though.

(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

31 Responses to “Carl Icahn Is Unimpressed With Goldman’s Efforts To Fight Off Carl Icahn”

  1. guest says:

    Matt, are you aware of any ibank conflict of interest cases that have resulted in a court refusing to uphold a contract? My understanding is that the conflict of interest cases pertain more specifically to a court's analysis of the fairness of a transaction.

  2. Guest says:

    Dick move by Icahn, but hysterical nonetheless. He should run for Congress. He'd fit right in.

  3. Backdoor_Bess says:

    Goldman is a clown shop, bro

  4. Whee lunch break says:

    You still have to pay a hooker even when you don't finish.

    – UBS Escort Quant

  5. Primalequity says:

    Just because icahn.

  6. Guest says:

    Stiffing Goldman for fees, the NKI!

  7. Crazy Carl says:

    "I don’t see him even really litigating it.

    But I hope he does!"

    Damnit Matt! I already got you a collector's edition HP-12C for the CFA Level 1 and now you're asking for this too?

  8. guest says:

    icahn doesn't have a leg to stand on legally, but just watch, goldman will accept a lower fee. their alternative is to argue publicly that they earned $18m selling a company for $30/share that someone offered to buy for $30/share. the press won't leave it alone, current and future clients will more closely scrutinize defense advisory incentive fees, NO ONE will side with goldman*, and they will increasingly look like the rent-seeking, living-on-mars, entitled lightweights they mostly are.
    * including CVR management. they have no formal power anymore, but the longer and more closely people look at what they signed up for the dumber they're going to seem.

  9. Guest says:

    Just as I was ready to stop reading, I started to scroll down … and I WAS DONE. It was a great feeling

  10. Real Money 77 says:

    Icahn's gonna choke on CVR at $30 so $18mm isn't gonna make much of a difference. He's the ultimate pump and dump artist.

  11. wqqknbgs says:

    bEgXIl ufyfjvolzjgw, [url=http://nhbwoftplwzo.com/]nhbwoftplwzo[/url], [link=http://gfcocmhdwbbb.com/]gfcocmhdwbbb[/link], http://vhwiaqlabwhc.com/

  12. CeLine Bag says:

    Hi, all the time i used to check webpage posts here in the early hours in the break of day, because i like to learn more and more.

  13. Miu Miu Bag says:

    I like the helpful information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check again here frequently. I am quite certain I will learn plenty of new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!

  14. I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It�s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the web will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  15. It also has a purpose to participate in in facilitating cultural shifts in between all way of customs. It hence stops socially-derived customs from remaining static, and underscores the relevance of adaptability in beliefs, attitudes and behaviors. So in a perception it displays on the floor a further resilience involving adaptation to changing situation, a thing critical in the record of the survival of the human species.

  16. Thomas pink: Pink was set up in 1984 by several Irish brothers ?James, Peter and John Mullen. Their notion was to reinvent the common Jermyn Street shirt, taking it to a broader, aspiration viewers. The model name Thomas Pink arrived from an 18th century London tailor recognized for generating sought-right after red searching jackets. If you had been lucky adequate to personal one particular, you had been claimed to be n the pink?

  17. wow gold says:

    Great article, exactly what I was looking for.