Reuters had a neat article today about how JPMorgan’s CIO embarrassment increased credit spreads for a bunch of investment grade companies. The 121 companies included in the CDX.IG.NA.9 index, in which JPMorgan apparently had a $100bn long position, saw their CDS spreads spike in the days after JPMorgan revealed its losses – and its intent to unwind that position – last month. As Reuters puts it, those companies’ CDS spreads

became more like the pawns in a battle between JPMorgan and hedge funds on the other side of its bet. This struggle so dominated a corner of the market that it sent false negative signals about the credit quality of some major companies whose underlying finances were largely unchanged, market experts said.

JPMorgan, sort of strangely, disagrees:

A JPMorgan spokeswoman said there was no causal link between the credit derivatives prices and the trading tied to the bank’s losses. The theory, she said in an emailed statement, “is wrong and ridiculous.”

But the Reuters analysis showed the 121 companies underlying the index of credit derivatives at the heart of the trading battle had a sharper increase in default insurance costs than 41 companies in a separate index that was not believed to be part of the big bets.

That statistical analysis – CDS on companies in the index went up by more than CDS on some other companies – is more suggestive than compelling, but also more suggestive than “wrong and ridiculous.” I like suggestive when I can pair it with a story. What is the story – the actual trade that would do this?

One of the early theories about the Whale’s detection was that he was trading against hedge funds who were doing “skew trades,” selling protection on the index components while buying protection on the index. Protection on the index (which the Whale was selling tons of) was cheaper than protection on all of its components, so they bought the former and sold the latter expecting the gap to close. When it didn’t close, because the Whale kept selling more protection, they started complaining to the media.

On that theory the trading against the Whale would have artificially driven down the CDS prices of companies in the relevant index in the weeks before they started complaining, as hedge funds sold lots of protection to hedge their purchases of index protection from the Whale. In May, as the Whale started unwinding his trade, they started unwinding against him – selling back to him the index protection he’d sold them, while buying in the protection they’d sold on individual names and so pushing up single-name prices.

The story and the statistics check out so I’ll buy it. But I won’t overpay for it; in particular, this “collateral damage” isn’t worth getting worked up about. Technicals – supply and demand for an instrument driven by something other than a deeply analyzed desire to own or avoid that instrument – are just a part of life. Sometimes they work for issuers – Facebook, for instance, wanted to be in the Nasdaq 100 index so badly that it convinced Nasdaq to waive its index requirements to let it in early; this is not a matter of cachet but one of access to $50bn of Nasdaq-100-indexed money. Sometimes they work against issuers – talk to, for instance, the wee retailers whose stocks get crushed when the XRT ETF rebalances.

Both effects presumably happened here. The Whale’s hedge fund counterparts – though not him, he wasn’t trading in the underlying CDS at all, or so it appears – would have driven down the CDS spreads of some companies earlier this year, and driven them back up last month. Maybe they increased volatility in those spreads – CDS levels were generally widening in May and tightening in December-March, so these technical effects were procyclical, increasing risk signals more when they were already increasing for “fundamental” reasons.

Perhaps worth worrying about, but hard to avoid: every security is a “pawn in the game” between people who want exposure to its risk, or some nth derivative of that risk, and people who want to avoid that exposure. So here JPMorgan’s unwind arguably sent “false signals” about the risk of, say, McDonald’s debt – but JPMorgan was unwinding a trade because it realized that it had excessive and dangerous exposure to the health of investment-grade corporate America. That realization of excessive exposure filtered down into signals about the creditworthiness of investment-grade corporate America, including McDonald’s. It’s not anything McDonald’s did – but nor is it wholly unrelated to the perceived risks of McDonald’s.

There is perhaps another reason not to overstate the case. This sure sounds bad:

Yet the cost to insure against a default at CSX surged 28 percent to $64,300 for five-year protection on $10 million in debt on May 14 from $50,100 on May 1. At the same time, the company’s stock fell just 5 percent. …

There was a similar pattern at McDonald’s. The cost of protecting the fast-food company’s debt against default rose more than 19 percent to $24,300 on May 14 from $20,400 on May 10, while McDonald’s stock fell just 1.1 percent.

Senior claims (debt) on one company should be less volatile than junior claims (stock) on the same company, so it’s weird that changes in CDS prices were a large multiple of changes in stock prices. Except, no – comparing yields (of CDS) and prices (of stocks) is misleading. Here is a rough recasting into comparable terms:

A move of four basis points in McDonald’s CDS spreads sounds – well, tiny expressed in basis points, but large expressed as a percentage change (“a thing went from 20 to 24 – a 20% change in the thing!”). But that doesn’t change the value of McDonald’s debt all that much – in fact, it changes the value by about 0.2%, a fraction of the change in the value of its stock. CSX’s stock was down by ten times as much as the decline in its debt value implied by CDS levels. Which suggests that the phantom worries of the CDS markets were small relative to the real worries of stock markets.

Insight: JPMorgan bets sent false signals to wider debt market [Reuters]

70 comments (hidden for your protection)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (70)

  1. Posted by Ty Webb, CFA | June 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM

    "Oh Matt, this isn't the 1st Saturday in June, Is it the first Saturday in June, It's not the first Saturday in June"

  2. Posted by guest | June 14, 2012 at 1:33 PM

    the fuck?

  3. Posted by guest | June 14, 2012 at 1:37 PM

    that comment landed right in the lumber yard.

  4. Posted by Guest | June 14, 2012 at 1:37 PM

    Classic Zach!

  5. Posted by BetterRed | June 14, 2012 at 1:43 PM

    Matt, Leave JPMorgan alone !!!!!!!

  6. Posted by Ross | June 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM

    Why, is he your imaginary butt buddy?

  7. Posted by Ross | June 14, 2012 at 1:50 PM

    Further proof that financial markets are rigged and distorted, compromising their integrity and function. Credit default swaps are dubious instruments, illegitimate at worse, and at best an insurance product that should be regulated as such. The fact that banks are still making these bets, virtually the same outlawed after the Great Depression, indicates the degree of control of regulatory statutes by the banking sector.

  8. Posted by BetterRed | June 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM

    no but you are.

  9. Posted by Buck | June 14, 2012 at 2:01 PM

    Thats gotta be a line right out of Joyce's Ulysses it's so fucked up… shit I knew I should have paid more attention in English lit and maybe I would get the joke.

  10. Posted by PermaGuestII | June 14, 2012 at 2:05 PM

    Nice grammar.

  11. Posted by PermaGuestII | June 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM

    They had CDS in 1941? Who knew…

  12. Posted by Guest | June 14, 2012 at 2:15 PM

    The computers are up again at the library?

  13. Posted by Im_a_Dude | June 14, 2012 at 2:33 PM

    were you laid off from your assistant trader job at Knight in '99 and have been bitter ever since?

  14. Posted by Deleveraging | June 14, 2012 at 2:49 PM

    Nice post Matt; greatful to have you unearth this obscure stuff. Made a great read during my conference call.

  15. Posted by Yup... | June 14, 2012 at 3:51 PM

    That Whale really skewed things up.

  16. Posted by 3rdgradereadinglevel | June 14, 2012 at 4:06 PM

    TFLTR

  17. Posted by Guest | June 14, 2012 at 4:12 PM

    You sir, are an idiot.

  18. Posted by Gartman | June 14, 2012 at 4:15 PM

    I knew then how risky they would be.

  19. Posted by Guest | June 14, 2012 at 4:49 PM

    Ross, you need to get over Rachel and Joey, you were on a break…

  20. Posted by Guest | June 14, 2012 at 5:22 PM

    But not TFL to scroll all the way to the bottom so you could leave a pointless comment?

  21. Posted by Perv Quant | June 14, 2012 at 6:12 PM

    It's never too long for that, until it moves that is.

    -senseless perverted joke bot

  22. Posted by Texashedge | June 14, 2012 at 6:13 PM

    I've got a pond and a pool. Pond 'd be good for that comment.

  23. Posted by Texashedge | June 14, 2012 at 6:16 PM

    If you mean Churchill's Daily Speeches, then yes.

  24. Posted by Guest | June 15, 2012 at 2:27 AM

    If a whale moves it tail in the middle of a crowded ocean, does anyone have any idea wtf happened?

    Apparently not.

  25. Posted by yousuckatswaps | June 15, 2012 at 8:03 AM

    Eric Dinallo, is that you? Where you been?

  26. Posted by bookmarking service | September 10, 2012 at 10:11 PM

    sZQqxv I value the blog article. Much obliged.

  27. Posted by ejaculation longer | September 19, 2012 at 7:28 AM

    Enjoyed every bit of your blog article.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  28. Posted by cheap seo services | September 23, 2012 at 4:42 PM

    BmXbwq I am so grateful for your article.Really thank you! Really Great.

  29. Posted by Buy Instagram Followers | September 27, 2012 at 7:18 AM

    Very informative blog.Much thanks again. Cool.

  30. Posted by travel series | September 27, 2012 at 12:41 PM

    Very neat post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  31. Posted by wedding photographer | September 28, 2012 at 4:44 AM

    Hey, thanks for the blog article.Thanks Again. Great.

  32. Posted by lIdA | September 28, 2012 at 5:48 AM

    I really like and appreciate your blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  33. Posted by charging | September 28, 2012 at 10:06 AM

    Major thankies for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  34. Posted by Dueling Pianos | September 29, 2012 at 7:17 AM

    Awesome article post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  35. Posted by dog day care sarasota fl | September 29, 2012 at 10:38 AM

    Major thanks for the blog. Really Cool.

  36. Posted by click here | September 29, 2012 at 10:48 AM

    Really informative article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  37. Posted by what is the safest e cigarette | September 30, 2012 at 5:02 AM

    Great article post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  38. Posted by youtube | October 1, 2012 at 5:29 AM

    Thanks for the post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  39. Posted by youtube | October 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  40. Posted by submit | October 1, 2012 at 4:47 PM

    Hey, thanks for the blog article.Really thank you! Cool.

  41. Posted by AdultSexxToys.Com | October 1, 2012 at 7:22 PM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  42. Posted by online hypnosis | October 2, 2012 at 7:35 PM

    Very good blog article. Want more.

  43. Posted by live girls on camera | October 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM

    I really liked your post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  44. Posted by fun socks | October 3, 2012 at 1:44 PM

    I really like and appreciate your blog post. Fantastic.

  45. Posted by jacob setzer law services | October 3, 2012 at 5:10 PM

    Major thankies for the blog article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  46. Posted by St George Chiropractor | October 4, 2012 at 6:55 AM

    Im obliged for the blog.Thanks Again.

  47. Posted by Tacoma Carpet Cleaners | October 4, 2012 at 4:57 PM

    I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  48. Posted by melty | October 5, 2012 at 4:09 AM

    Say, you got a nice blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  49. Posted by hypnosis cds | October 5, 2012 at 9:24 AM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic post. Much obliged.

  50. Posted by copier | October 5, 2012 at 3:48 PM

    I think this is a real great post. Cool.

  51. Posted by zombie apparel | October 8, 2012 at 4:27 AM

    I think this is a real great post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  52. Posted by app | October 8, 2012 at 11:03 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  53. Posted by online trading | October 8, 2012 at 4:12 PM

    Really informative blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  54. Posted by Buy Instagram Followers | October 8, 2012 at 5:06 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  55. Posted by Exposure | October 9, 2012 at 4:39 AM

    Really informative article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  56. Posted by Photo of Week | October 9, 2012 at 7:28 AM

    Im obliged for the article post.Really thank you!

  57. Posted by Mens Fashion Online Shopping | October 9, 2012 at 8:23 AM

    Hey, thanks for the post. Will read on…

  58. Posted by this site | October 9, 2012 at 6:13 PM

    Thanks so much for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.

  59. Posted by cours du diamant | October 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM

    Very good blog article. Really Great.

  60. Posted by Jaguar rims | October 10, 2012 at 8:59 AM

    This is one awesome blog post. Cool.

  61. Posted by sex cams | October 10, 2012 at 10:16 AM

    Awesome blog article. Really Great.

  62. Posted by Teflon rod | October 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM

    Thank for your blog. It is Goood, Hope more for it. [url=http://www.teflonrod.com]Teflon[/url]

  63. Posted by best erection stimulants | October 10, 2012 at 10:32 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  64. Posted by how to finger a girl | October 11, 2012 at 1:30 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog. Great.

  65. Posted by Fleshlight video | October 11, 2012 at 3:52 AM

    Thanks again for the blog article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  66. Posted by online American English | October 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM

    Major thanks for the blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  67. Posted by roofing contractor indianapolis | October 13, 2012 at 4:55 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  68. Posted by PA schools | October 16, 2012 at 9:47 AM

    A round of applause for your article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  69. Posted by TEFLON | October 16, 2012 at 10:28 AM

    Thank for your blog. It is Goood, Hope more for it. [url=http://www.PTFE-sheet.com]PTFE[/url] [url=http://www.PTFE-rod.com]PTFE[/url] [url=http://www.Teflonrod.com]PTFE[/url] [url=http://www.fluoroplastic.cn]PTFE[/url]

  70. Posted by Birthday cakes | October 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM

    Very neat blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.