• 26 Jun 2012 at 6:36 PM

Libor Can Be Whatever You Want It To Be

There is much to ponder in the continuing saga of Libor but this sounds like an excuse:

The U.K. bankers and regulators charged with reviewing Libor in the wake of regulatory probes are resisting calls to overhaul the rate because structural changes risk invalidating trillions of dollars of contracts. … [They] won’t propose structural changes such as basing the rate on actual trades or taking away oversight of the benchmark from the BBA ….

Any substantial changes could affect existing contracts that reference Libor, according to Simon Gleeson, a partner at law firm Clifford Chance LLP in London. … “There’s a tail of contracts that may take 10, 20, 50 years to run off which use Libor as an undefined term, because nobody felt it needed defining,” Gleeson said. “The more changes you make, the more likely it is that somebody will be able to argue this is a material change to their contract.”

Is this true? I mean, it’s probably true, whatever, I am not a London lawyer, but it’s really tempting to take the other side here. Here is a pretty normal and alphabetically privileged credit agreement:

LIBO Rate” shall mean, with respect to any LIBOR Borrowing for any Interest Period, an interest rate (rounded upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/100 of 1%) equal to the offered rate for deposits in either Dollars or Euros for a period equal to the Interest Period for such LIBOR Borrowing that appears on the Reuters LIBOR01 Page (or any page that can reasonably be considered a replacement page) at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, two Business Days prior to the commencement of such Interest Period. If such rate is not available on the Reuters LIBOR01 Page, the “LIBO Rate” shall be the rate (rounded upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/100 of 1%) equal to the arithmetic average of the respective rates per annum at which Dollar or Euro, as applicable, deposits approximately equal in principal amount to such LIBOR Borrowing and for a maturity comparable to such Interest Period are offered in immediately available funds to the London branches of the Reference Banks in the London interbank market at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, two Business Days prior to the commencement of such Interest Period.

Or if your preferred flavor of Libor is swap rather than loan, here is the Annex to the 2000 ISDA Definitions*:

“USD-LIBOR-BBA” means that the rate for a Reset Date will be the rate for deposits in U.S. Dollars for a period of the Designated Maturity which appears on the Telerate Page 3750 as of 11:00 a.m., London time, on the day that is two London Banking Days preceding that Reset Date. If such rate does not appear on the Telerate Page 3750, the rate for that Reset Date will be determined as if the parties had specified “USD-LIBOR-Reference Banks” as the applicable Floating Rate Option.

I think the takeaway from this is that for most users of Libor, it is neither an abstract correct-interest-rate concept nor a specific set of procedures by which the British Bankers Association transmutes some lies that banks tell about their funding costs into an actual funding cost for zillions of dollars of swaps and floating rate loans. Instead it is the output of a Reuters or Telerate or Bloomberg page. I for one would love to see Reuters try to fix Libor on their own – just find some actual interbank unsecured lending transactions that look like what you think Libor should be,** and drop those prices into your Reuters Libor page. Problem solved.

That’s only half serious – I suspect Reuters would run into some liability there, especially since they’re the BBA’s contracted calculation agent for Libor – and even if the BBA and Reuters agreed to do something similar (find real transactions, use them for Libor, report result on Reuters page) some Libor contract users would have some cause to complain based on the savings clauses in those contracts,*** or based on general ill humor.

But the point is that this is the way it’s supposed to work: nobody refers to Libor because they want to enshrine (or even know) the exact procedure by which its calculated; they refer to it because they want to get at the underlying concept and they’d rather leave to the BBA the mechanics of getting to that concept. If BBA Libor once represented the unsecured borrowing costs of prime banks – or something else, like “the risk-free rate”**** – and now it doesn’t, then that is a really good reason for contract users to be pissed off. If it was once calculated by a poll and tomorrow it starts being calculated by trades, that is less clearly a good reason to be pissed off. That’s just, like, an administrative thing.

It is hard to spell out everything in a contract and so the financial world is full of shorthand ways of doing so. CDS contracts, for instance, basically say “if the issuer defaults you will be made whole on your defaulted bonds,” but they say that by reference to a whole big pile of rules. And those rules mostly didn’t work when Greece picked a creative way to default on its bonds, so ISDA went and fixed them. And now if you have a CDS contract it should work for when Spain defaults ha kidding Spain will never default got you there. (Actually the fix is not automatic – you have to agree to apply the new rules to your old trades – but close enough.)

You’d think Libor would work in the same way: that it would be a seamless plug-in to your contract that can be left in the hands of people whose job is to worry about Libor, and that their occasional fine-tuning, or coarse-tuning I guess, of the best way to measure bank borrowing costs or risk-free rates or whatever would flow through your contract without blowing you up. And that’s kind of how the contracts are written isn’t it? They refer to the result, the Reuters page, not the process. So the fact that the Libor, um, “guardians,” don’t see their job that way – that they see themselves as constrained by the contracts that refer to them, rather than as obligated to the users of those contracts to change – is pretty weak.

There are lots of potential reasons for the BBA to resist, of course: maybe they don’t like change, or they don’t think it’s that broken, or they actually can’t find sensible traded/executable substitutes, or they are after all a bankers’ association and so have a residual fondness for letting their members nudge Libor a bit. One potential problem, though, is that it’s a lot harder to identify a single concept behind Libor than it was five years ago. If Libor isn’t just a trimmed average of some numbers that some banks tell someone from Reuters every day, then it is … the risk-free rate? The unsecured borrowing rate for AA banks? The unsecured borrowing rate for an actual assortment of disparately rated, often barely investment grade, rather tarnished banks that mostly don’t actually lend to each other? Any move to an actual traded thing will require making clearer choices on that question, and it’s pretty understandable that nobody would want to actually make those choices.

Libor Guardians Said To Resist Changes To Broken Rate [Bloomberg]

* There are other options for Reuters pages too. They all default-in-absence-of-pages to:

“USD-LIBOR-Reference Banks” means that the rate for a Reset Date will be determined on the basis of the rates at which deposits in U.S. Dollars are offered by the Reference Banks at approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, on teh day that is two London Banking Days preceding that Reset Date to prime banks in the London interbank market for a period of the Designated Maturity commencing on that Reset Date and in a Representative Amount. The Calculation Agent will request the principal London office of each of the Reference Banks to provide a quotation of its rate. …

** I gather this is harder than it sounds, and there’s a reason beyond orneriness and existing contracts that the BBA doesn’t just do that, but ignore that for a minute.

*** I.e.: if in the absence of the Reuters page you default to actual offers to reference banks, then you could I guess argue that a big change in the Reuters page makes it a non-successor and defaults you to those actual offers etc., whatever, it’s boring, I’d note that BBA Libor is not really calculated based on offers to banks but based on those banks’ imaginations of what they’d be offered so it’s not clear that that argument really works.

**** Isn’t that weird? This is from Investopedia but that doesn’t make it wrong:

The LIBOR curve and the Treasury yield curve are the most widely-used proxies for the risk-free interest rates. Although not theoretically risk-free, LIBOR is considered a good proxy against which to measure the risk/return tradeoff for other short-term floating rate instruments.

I mean, it’s wrong, I guess, but it’s what I was taught too. Like, if short-term unsecured lending to AA banks isn’t risk-free, what is? And there you go. Remember AA banks? I feel old.

44 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (44)

  1. Posted by Asterisk | June 26, 2012 at 7:05 PM

    Well, looks like another satisfying day of hard work for me, time for some margs!

  2. Posted by Texashedge | June 26, 2012 at 7:06 PM

    "The LIBOR curve and the Treasury yield curve are the most widely-used proxies for the risk-free interest rates. Although not theoretically risk-free, LIBOR is considered a good proxy against which to measure the risk/return tradeoff for other short-term floating rate instruments."

    See TED spread, October 2008

  3. Posted by Farmer Ted | June 26, 2012 at 7:48 PM

    Matt, when you went into the fourth asterisk after the thirteenth paragraph on the scintillating topic of the nuances of libor, I got a full on bonobos in my shorts.

  4. Posted by ghest | June 26, 2012 at 9:54 PM

    For your sake, Matt, I'm hoping to one day see a 6:36pm post with the footnote "Sent from my Blackberry"

  5. Posted by Ben | June 26, 2012 at 10:07 PM

    ISDA 2000?

  6. Posted by guest | June 26, 2012 at 11:31 PM

    Matt, your footnotes are charming and distinctive. And, yet, they are difficult to use. Therefore, it is with some reluctance and hesitation that I request that you consider formatting them as hyperlinks.

  7. Posted by guest | June 27, 2012 at 1:08 AM

    Seconded. Or rollover links that pop up with the footnote next to the cursor.

  8. Posted by Fengshuipractitioner | June 27, 2012 at 3:15 AM

    There are lots of potential reasons for the BBA to resist.

  9. Posted by Guest | June 27, 2012 at 8:34 AM

    That would be solid. I bet your MD loves you.

  10. Posted by el guesto | June 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM

    I think the most under-rated part of this entire article is the hover-over blurb that pops up on the picture. Take a look; worth it.

  11. Posted by JohnnyCanes | June 27, 2012 at 10:21 AM

    Really? Does it have to do with how they furnished their office? Astrology? Just normal pigheadedness? Please expand.

  12. Posted by Guest | June 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM

    I get the sense that when you ask "hows it going?" Matt is the kind of guy that tells you.

  13. Posted by Grinders | June 27, 2012 at 11:12 AM

    Just, you know, FYI. The editing phase is for cutting the fat, not adding unnecessary phrases.

  14. Posted by Guest | June 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM

    Bravo.

  15. Posted by QUiKDiNG | June 27, 2012 at 11:39 AM

    boring

  16. Posted by Miko | June 27, 2012 at 11:59 AM

    nice recent picture of a city worker in london. any reason why it is not in colour.

    another normal day in a british takeaway counter http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?q=Ascot+Men&st

  17. Posted by jesse | June 27, 2012 at 12:15 PM

    Reminds me of that Economist article about LIBOR lawsuits by Canada and even Baltimore. I think the time has come for more concrete evidence on why a number is given.
    http://www.economist.com/node/21552586

  18. Posted by smarterthanmatt | June 27, 2012 at 12:46 PM

    whats odd is that Barclays 3m USD Libor was actually above the average, significantly, for the period in question which is contrary to the article. not as clear with EUR. something else was happening, i'd guess.

  19. Posted by bookmarking submission | September 11, 2012 at 3:57 PM

    VYNJm8 Thank you for your post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  20. Posted by crork | September 12, 2012 at 2:24 AM

    w3lSJo I cannot thank you enough for the blog.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  21. Posted by Andres Gamino | October 3, 2012 at 2:36 AM

    Burning down that warehouse is in my arson-wish-list.

  22. Posted by Rafael Stremlow | October 3, 2012 at 8:05 AM

    Tremendously interesting cheers, It is my opinion your trusty readers would possibly want an excellent offer additional nicely written posts along these lines continue on the nice difficult perform.

  23. Posted by www.cox | October 4, 2012 at 3:44 PM

    I enjoy the sound of all of your plans and its a fantastic concept to make it into one big adventure for your women. (1st comment but been a lurker for your several ages!) Quite exciting.

  24. Posted by new york travel deals | October 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM

    Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!

  25. Posted by Provillus a scam | October 5, 2012 at 5:54 AM

    Hi, perhaps you could assist me? I found u are using Blog Engine in your website. I recently decided to launch a weblog for myself and i am presently making use of a wordpress weblog. I read about blog engine and i was wondering if you can inform me exactly where i could find very great instruction or movies on how to use it correctly? Thanks for that reply.

  26. Posted by like this | October 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM

    I went over this site and I conceive you have a lot of superb in order, saved to my bookmarks (:.

  27. Posted by Laronda Segrest | October 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM

    Though you might not be a promoting guru, advertising can get your cleaning business noticed by potential clients. But prior to you spend any of one’s marketing dollars, determine on your target market place. Locating your particular niche and directing your ad dollars to that region is going to be probably the most powerful method to get clientele calling and asking about your services and hopefully signing on as new jaydeep biswas shoppers.

  28. Posted by wypadekuk | October 6, 2012 at 3:13 AM

    Together with all gadget that appears to ensue construction within this specific issue materials, heaps of your perspectives are positively exciting. Nonetheless, I appologize, because I don’t subscribe to your complete strategy, each and every one be present it refreshing nobody the less. It seems to everyone that your opinions will not be wholly modernized and in undemanding actuality you might ensue typically yourself not truly finally convinced of the assertion. Popular one rationale I did engage pleasure in conception through it.

  29. Posted by More Info | October 6, 2012 at 7:14 AM

    This is a sunny redeployment, I was wondering if I can use this write-up on my website, I will link it back to your website though. Qualification this is a problem entertain allow me identify and I will acquire it along right away

  30. Posted by Salvador Rary | October 6, 2012 at 9:01 AM

    Your ad should inform why your cleaning firm could be the most effective inside the location. By far the most convincing strategy to do this is through dr. jaydeep biswas testimonials, statistics and awards.

  31. Posted by Joi Blade | October 6, 2012 at 10:55 PM

    Rather than the traditional enterprise card, why not try get your contact facts printed on some thing that persons may well leave in plain sight; anything that can remind them of you as well as your services or merchandise whenever they look at it. Why not make it message pads, coasters, mouse pads or maybe make it as fridge magnets. The decision of your business card style is restricted only by your imagination. By making it straightforward for persons to remember you by utilizing additional unusual patterns and designs on your business card griffin holdings group llc is really a intelligent investment.

  32. Posted by offshore investment fund | October 7, 2012 at 4:33 PM

    You made some decent points there. I looked on the internet for the subject matter and found most people will go along with with your site.

  33. Posted by nusajaya square | October 8, 2012 at 12:02 AM

    This might add significantly to your personal contents. When a home mortgage. {||||

  34. Posted by Faltrollo kaufen | October 8, 2012 at 12:33 AM

    There may well not be good enough Jeff Helmses inside the entire world, but you will discover surely plenty of honest car collectors out there. The honest car collectors just should be much more vocal regarding the frauds they see, as quite a few other individuals listed here have already stated.

  35. Posted by Plissee fürs Wohnzimmer kaufen | October 8, 2012 at 12:53 AM

    Below in Honolulu, Magoo’s Pizza may make an excellent pie. They’re a locally-owned modest small business that make their pizzas inside a converted bus on King Street following to McDonald’s. Superior stuff.

  36. Posted by electric bicycle | October 8, 2012 at 11:19 PM

    ebikess are genuinely cheaper and efficient. At an average rate of 100-150 watts of electrical energy compared to gasoline consumption.

  37. Posted by link | October 9, 2012 at 12:14 PM

    Thanks on behalf of all your efforts that you have situate in this. extremely stimulating info.

  38. Posted by Miroverve vs Triactol | October 9, 2012 at 11:15 PM

    Amazing article. There’s a lot of great info here, though I want tell you one thing – I am utilizing windows 7 with the latest beta of Firefox, the look and feel of your site is sort of quirky for me. I can understand the post, but the navigation does not operate so great for me.

  39. Posted by Tommie Quilici | October 10, 2012 at 1:34 AM

    Great article post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  40. Posted by Josiah Wernz | October 10, 2012 at 6:16 AM

    Of course, what a great blog and instructive posts, I definitely will bookmark your blog.All the Best!

  41. Posted by payment processors | October 11, 2012 at 8:44 AM

    Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  42. Posted by the electronic cigarette store coupon | October 11, 2012 at 9:19 PM

    Don’t worry baby 80% of women had same case

  43. Posted by wypadek w uk | October 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM

    I’m script to allow you identify of the beneficial bump into my friend’s child gained using your locate. She came to understand such a lot of things, which built-in what it is like to have an splendid openhanded smartness to have scores of others smoothly gain knowledge of about a number of problematic issue areas. You actually exceeded our expected fallout. Merit for openhanded these efficient, trusted, informative and in totaling matchless tips by that topic to Janet.

  44. Posted by similar webpage | October 16, 2012 at 4:58 PM

    Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same outcome.