A thing I sometimes enjoy is reading research papers examining questions like:

  • if you are a bank, and you are likely to be bailed out, do you take more risks than a bank all on its lonesome, and
  • once you’ve been bailed out, what then?

We’ve looked at a BIS paper on international banks, which on certain assumptions found that (1) banks that were in fact bailed out took more risks pre-bailout than banks that weren’t (unsurprising) and (2) after the bailouts they pretty much stayed riskier (maybe surprising). And then there was a Fed paper about TARP banks, which on certain different assumptions found sort of the same results.

Anyway in the spirit of completism and also charts here is a Bank of Canada paper:

“Supported” banks seem to have been a wee bit less risky than regular banks before the crisis, and quite a bit less risky afterwards, somewhat contradicting those other findings. Here is a stab at an explanation:

[D]uring normal times, non-supported banks compete more fiercely with supported banks since the latter benefit from lower refinancing costs, which pushes non-supported banks towards higher risk-taking. … In line with the charter value argument, we conjecture that supported banks may enjoy a funding advantage during the crisis and therefore exhibit lower risk compared to banks that are not supported. At the same time we cannot rule out other explanations, as our findings would also be consistent with the idea that supported banks during crisis times are subject to greater scrutiny by supervisors that is effective in reducing risk taking ….

All fair enough: if you don’t have implicit government backing on your funding, you need to gamble more with that funding to get the same returns, and nobody is looking at you all that closely to see that you don’t.

Except! This paper is interesting because it separates “supported” and “non-supported” banks not based on ex post measures like “did you get a bailout or not” but rather on an interesting ex ante measure: the fact that Canadian rating agency DBRS changed its rating scheme in October 2006 to indicate which banks were more likely to get government support. So the researchers were able to pick banks that were likely to be bailed out in 2006, rather than banks that were actually bailed out in 2007-2008, to measure what effect bailout expectations had on banks. Which is interesting.

The problem is that rating agencies are dumb. Here is a true (partial) list of banks that were likely to get government support according to DBRS:

  • Commonwealth Bank of Australia
  • Bank of Nova Scotia
  • Royal Bank of Canada
  • HBOS plc
  • Lloyds
  • RBS
  • Fortis

Not, you might say, hugely objectionable. Now here is a true (partial) list of banks that were not likely to get government support according to DBRS:

  • Laurentian Bank
  • Bank of Hawaii
  • Bank of America
  • Bank of New York
  • JPMorgan Chase
  • Citigroup

This list is more problematic, though I’ll spot them Laurentian Bank.* The authors recognize this, though they defend it by saying “DBRS’s [government support] ratings were in full agreement with Fitch’s Support Ratings, indicating that as of 2006, none of the US banks was likely to be bailed out.” That is even more problematic: apparently nobody at a rating agency could figure out that JPMorgan might be systemically important.**

I don’t really know what this tells you other than: why would you trust a rating agency to tell you who will get a bailout? DBRS decided that, for instance, the two banks in charge of the triparty repo system were not systemically important and “there is no expectation of any form of timely external support” for them. That was pretty wrong, though I guess if you asked Jamie Dimon (if you could find him) he’d tell you that JPMorgan never really got any external support. Still: Citi!

In theory, rating agencies are in the business of (1) looking at public information about an issuer, (2) also looking at private information provided to them by management (or, sometimes, not doing that), and (3) analyzing that information to draw some conclusions about the issuer’s creditworthiness. Sometimes the combination of specialization, credit analysis expertise and access to private information gives the agencies an advantage in drawing those conclusions. Sometimes it does not.

But as a theory that seems like an okay theory. It’s harder to see the agencies’ advantage in predicting political decisions in developed economies, whether that’s S&P’s guess at the US’s creditworthiness or DBRS’s guess at who will be bailed out when and by whom. And the more an industry or an economy is tied to political decisions, the less likely it is that ratings will tell you anything you can’t figure out for yourself.

The Ex-Ante Versus Ex-Post Effect of Public Guarantees [Bank of Canada, pdf]

* Is that wrong? Are they a powerhouse north of the border?

** TBF they also run their analysis excluding the US banks and got similar results. But the sample is sort of uninteresting then, it’s all Canadian banks who all pretty much didn’t need bailouts, plus a tiny grab bag of idiosyncratic Belgian and Irish banks, so it’s hard to know how to feel.

86 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (86)

  1. Posted by TGar | August 21, 2012 at 12:15 PM

    "A thing I sometimes enjoy is reading research papers"….

    enough said

  2. Posted by guest | August 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM

    the fuck?

  3. Posted by Matt's Mum | August 21, 2012 at 12:22 PM

    Leave Matty alone, asshole!

  4. Posted by juniormistmaker | August 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM

    Oh we bring the pain!

    – Laurentian Bank GIC salesman

  5. Posted by tats | August 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM
  6. Posted by guest | August 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM

    I think a fair assessment as to why DBRS failed to attribute potential bailouts to the major US banks was an opinion on the political and regulatory system and how they would behave in times of crisis.

    In contrast to the US, Canada is generally viewed as politically more centrist and therefore more likely to support bailouts when required. I think many Americans would have been bewildered and/or vehemently against the thought of having to bailout banks in 2006.

  7. Posted by Warm Glass of Charts | August 21, 2012 at 12:39 PM

    Looks like nap time's a bit early today!

  8. Posted by guest | August 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM

    Au francais?

  9. Posted by America | August 21, 2012 at 12:50 PM

    Wait wait wait, CANADA thinks bailouts are a good call!??! Wtf man, nobody mentioned that!!!

  10. Posted by Guest | August 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM

    You know I'm not so sure about that. Recent research has shown the empirical evidence for globalization of corporate innovation is very limited. And as a corollary, the market for technologies is shrinking.

    As a world leader, it is important for America to provide systematic research grants for our scientists. I believe there will always be a need for us to have a well-articulated innovation policy with emphasis on human resource development. Thank you.

  11. Posted by Captain Sparrow | August 21, 2012 at 12:53 PM

    I just charted a course straight to Nappy Island.

  12. Posted by Pot vs Kettle | August 21, 2012 at 12:54 PM

    A waste of ink, but alas…this is the Internet

  13. Posted by Ghost rider | August 21, 2012 at 12:56 PM

    But that's like my opinion, bro.

  14. Posted by guest | August 21, 2012 at 12:57 PM

    What happened? I blacked out.

  15. Posted by Guest | August 21, 2012 at 4:52 PM

    Laurentian is like the 7th largest bank in Canada, which may as well be the 40-50th largest bank in America.

  16. Posted by copywriting | August 30, 2012 at 3:35 AM

    Hard to read research papers, better science-fiction pr even personal development in my opinion.

  17. Posted by Emerson Sulecki | September 19, 2012 at 2:11 PM

    I hope to kick the smoking, which causes death

  18. Posted by crork | September 23, 2012 at 9:00 PM

    ZfTduu I really liked your blog.Really looking forward to read more.

  19. Posted by cheap seo services | September 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM

    JzVxSj Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  20. Posted by buy reverbnation plays | September 27, 2012 at 9:14 AM

    Im grateful for the post.Really thank you! Great.

  21. Posted by numerology love calculator | September 27, 2012 at 10:51 AM

    I really enjoy the post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  22. Posted by nightclub | September 27, 2012 at 7:05 PM

    Im grateful for the blog article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  23. Posted by plano plumber | September 27, 2012 at 8:28 PM

    Appreciate you sharing, great article.Really thank you! Cool.

  24. Posted by Lida | September 28, 2012 at 6:08 AM

    Im grateful for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  25. Posted by http://fapturboi.com | September 28, 2012 at 10:02 AM

    Really informative blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  26. Posted by http://lowerleftbackpain.info | September 28, 2012 at 11:14 AM

    I am so grateful for your blog.Really thank you! Will read on…

  27. Posted by 1 dollar logo | September 28, 2012 at 5:38 PM

    This is one awesome blog article.Really looking forward to read more.

  28. Posted by paskolos | September 29, 2012 at 6:02 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

  29. Posted by web scribble | September 29, 2012 at 11:08 AM

    Thanks so much for the blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  30. Posted by 500 Fast Cash | September 30, 2012 at 10:59 AM

    A round of applause for your blog.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  31. Posted by gadgets | September 30, 2012 at 4:16 PM

    Im grateful for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  32. Posted by wristwatches | October 1, 2012 at 5:34 AM

    Im thankful for the article post.Really thank you! Cool.

  33. Posted by erotismo | October 1, 2012 at 11:20 AM

    I think this is a real great post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  34. Posted by fashion | October 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM

    Hey, thanks for the article. Keep writing.

  35. Posted by empower network scam | October 2, 2012 at 4:52 AM

    This is one awesome post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  36. Posted by austin dermatology for all ethnicities | October 2, 2012 at 10:29 AM

    Awesome article post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  37. Posted by columbus pediatric dentist | October 2, 2012 at 2:05 PM

    Awesome blog.Thanks Again. Cool.

  38. Posted by hypnosis courses | October 2, 2012 at 6:01 PM

    Thanks again for the article. Keep writing.

  39. Posted by zija | October 2, 2012 at 6:13 PM

    Major thanks for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  40. Posted by buy instagram followers | October 2, 2012 at 9:58 PM

    Hey, thanks for the blog.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  41. Posted by automated business services system | October 2, 2012 at 11:38 PM

    I really liked your blog article.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  42. Posted by weight loss supplements | October 3, 2012 at 1:33 AM

    Im thankful for the article post. Really Cool.

  43. Posted by organic bedding | October 3, 2012 at 4:09 PM

    I really liked your article post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  44. Posted by jacob setzer charlotte | October 3, 2012 at 7:39 PM

    Im obliged for the blog post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  45. Posted by check it out | October 4, 2012 at 1:18 AM

    Thank you ever so for you blog. Keep writing.

  46. Posted by Plastic Surgeons Fayetteville NY | October 4, 2012 at 10:01 AM

    Very good article post. Really Cool.

  47. Posted by los angeles fashion photographer | October 4, 2012 at 1:17 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article. Want more.

  48. Posted by Battery Chargers | October 5, 2012 at 1:20 AM

    wow, awesome article.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  49. Posted by Buy Instagram Followers | October 5, 2012 at 6:03 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  50. Posted by cheap seo services | October 7, 2012 at 7:37 PM

    2jR4zC Fantastic post.Much thanks again. Great.

  51. Posted by Utility studies | October 8, 2012 at 8:56 PM

    A big thank you for your blog article. Fantastic.

  52. Posted by Swindon computer repairs | October 9, 2012 at 5:48 AM

    Say, you got a nice article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  53. Posted by AlloDerm Tissue Expanders | October 9, 2012 at 2:33 PM

    I think this is a real great article.Much thanks again. Cool.

  54. Posted by sex cams | October 10, 2012 at 7:13 AM

    Thanks a lot for the blog article.

  55. Posted by sex cams | October 10, 2012 at 7:57 AM

    Enjoyed every bit of your blog article.Really thank you! Great.

  56. Posted by mobile phone tracker app | October 10, 2012 at 1:20 PM

    Very good blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  57. Posted by blocked | October 10, 2012 at 1:22 PM

    Hey, thanks for the post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  58. Posted by how to meet women | October 11, 2012 at 6:53 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  59. Posted by beauty | October 11, 2012 at 7:38 AM

    I appreciate you sharing this article post.Really thank you! Will read on…

  60. Posted by facebook photo contests | October 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM

    Thank you ever so for you article post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  61. Posted by plastic surgery pittsburgh | October 11, 2012 at 11:22 AM

    Im obliged for the post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  62. Posted by american accent training | October 11, 2012 at 2:03 PM

    Really enjoyed this blog.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  63. Posted by assistenza hardware | October 11, 2012 at 3:22 PM

    Thank you ever so for you post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  64. Posted by affiliate programs | October 11, 2012 at 6:40 PM

    Awesome blog.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  65. Posted by Peter Francis-Macrae | October 12, 2012 at 2:54 AM

    Say, you got a nice article post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.

  66. Posted by Automotive Charging Systems | October 12, 2012 at 5:23 AM

    I really liked your blog post.Really thank you!

  67. Posted by Peter Francis-Macrae | October 12, 2012 at 5:29 AM

    Thanks so much for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  68. Posted by hypnosis video | October 12, 2012 at 5:34 AM

    Major thanks for the article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  69. Posted by how to hypnotize a dog | October 12, 2012 at 7:31 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog article. Want more.

  70. Posted by indian wedding video | October 12, 2012 at 10:44 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this article post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  71. Posted by Domestic Cleaners Milton Keynes | October 12, 2012 at 2:08 PM

    Im obliged for the blog article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  72. Posted by Port | October 12, 2012 at 9:14 PM

    Enjoyed every bit of your post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  73. Posted by forexsignalsprovider.com | October 12, 2012 at 11:50 PM

    Thanks so much for the blog post. Great.

  74. Posted by facebook photo likes | October 15, 2012 at 5:05 AM

    Thanks a lot for the blog.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  75. Posted by Marketing Money Machine | October 15, 2012 at 9:02 AM

    I really like and appreciate your blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  76. Posted by Hoagies Pittsburgh PA | October 15, 2012 at 11:00 AM

    Really informative article post.Thanks Again. Great.

  77. Posted by Hair replacement seattle washington | October 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM

    Wow, great blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  78. Posted by Samsung Galaxy S3 | October 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM

    I really like and appreciate your blog article. Will read on…

  79. Posted by best workout routine | October 15, 2012 at 12:38 PM

    Really enjoyed this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  80. Posted by LiDa | October 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM

    A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! Really Great.

  81. Posted by fast weight loss tips | October 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM

    Im obliged for the blog post.Much thanks again. Want more.

  82. Posted by payday loans | October 16, 2012 at 3:20 AM

    Very good blog. Really Great.

  83. Posted by Bolt Admin Panel | October 16, 2012 at 5:03 AM

    Very informative blog post. Want more.

  84. Posted by Get Commissions For Free review | October 16, 2012 at 5:19 PM

    Very informative blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

  85. Posted by 30+ Mind Blowing Pencil Sculpture | October 16, 2012 at 6:30 PM

    Awesome post.Much thanks again. Great.

  86. Posted by health insurance | October 16, 2012 at 8:22 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.