Knight Unhorsed

Yesterday I and others pointed out that, while UBS was not alone in getting screwed by Nasdaq failures on Facebook, it was alone in losing 10x as much as other, more competent market makers like Knight Capital, and ha ha ha. This apparently had a jinxing effect:

Knight Capital Group Inc., one of the largest trading firms, told brokerages to send their orders elsewhere and was probing a software problem, according to people involved in the matter. U.S. exchanges said they were examining potentially erroneous trading in more than 100 securities that saw big price swings or unusually high volume. Knight saw a fifth of its own market value wiped out. …

The system error and reports of irregular trading stoked suspicions that trades had been accidentally duplicated via computer algorithms, rather than the problem being contained to one server, as has happened in the past, traders said.

Knight is down ~21%, vs. ~4% yesterday for UBS and its costly Facebook fail, a useful reminder that focusing on perfecting your market-making business may make you less likely to fuck it up, but when you do fuck it up it goes far worse for you. That’s maybe some sort of a metaphor for high-frequency electronic market-making generally, which it will not surprise you to learn is coming in for some flak today.* Algorithmic high frequency trading makes it more likely that your small trade will be executed quickly and cheaply, but it also makes it more likely that larger orders will go horribly awry as prices move away from them.

Which is why this coincidence (?) pointed out by the Journal is kind of tantalizing:

The episode struck on the same day that NYSE Euronext introduced a new program designed to produce more competitive prices for retail investors. The so-called retail liquidity program enables market-makers to offer improvements on stock prices in fractions of a cent—a new function for stock exchanges. A spokesman for NYSE Euronext said Wednesday that the system was functioning properly.

More documentation on that here; basically it allows market-makers to submit pre-programmed undisplayed offers to improve price for retail liquidity takers in $0.001 increments. This would seem to improve pricing for retail investors – the name “Retail Price Improvement Orders” is a dead giveaway – but, trading costs being zero-sum, that’s gotta come from somewhere.** Traditional theory is that, the more that market makers can distinguish uninformed retail traders from big and/or informed institutions, the more they can price discriminate, offering well-priced liquidity to retail and jacking up costs for big/informed orders. The extra $0.001 per share that retail investors save comes out of an extra $0.05 (or whatever!) per share that mutual funds lose, with Knight and its friends pocketing the spare $0.049. Zero sum.

Obviously if a new system comes into effect and you are an algorithmic trading firm, you would want to build new algorithms to take advantage of it; those algorithms would presumably make you more aggressive in some places – to try to get that retail flow – and less aggressive in others – to back away from less desirable trades. So you might expect more aggressive orders in some circumstances and widening bid-asks in others. And, of course, when you implement new algorithms that haven’t been tested in the market before, sometimes they go wrong in embarrassing ways – so your more aggressive orders, and others’ backing away, might land you in a bunch of erroneous trades. Like Knight’s.

But that’s all baseless speculation. Here’s another theory for what happened (also here):

Traders said they believed a large order for a number of stocks was executed in five minutes rather than a longer period of up to five days. The far shorter transaction period pushed prices sharply higher or lower as the scale of the orders overwhelmed the natural liquidity of the market, which is limited for smaller capitalised stocks.

Which, if true, has nothing to do with any new systems and structures: it’s fat-finger-y rather than fat-algo-y. And it jives with the fact that the problems are only with 148 names rather than all of the NYSE. So I guess I’ll buy it. Computers are extremely efficient at propagating screw-ups widely and quickly, but they do their best work with human assistance.

Volatility Rocks U.S. Stock Market, Halts Some Trading [WSJ]
NYSE reviews trading after algo glitch [FT]

* Like: “‘Today is a day that proves that you just can’t rely on machines,’ said Joseph Saluzzi, co-head of equity trading at Themis Trading,” or “‘This is another example of a market structure that has failed. Another example how they have ruined the market structure to appease the machines,’ said Saluzzi, author of Broken Markets,” or the straightforward “Kill the quants before they kill us!”

** We talked about a not-unrelated proposal before, to improve the social functioning of HFT by reducing the minimum price increment. At the time I thought it sounded like a purely good thing, and all the knowledgeable commenters were like “you are an idiot,” so, duly noted. It is not a purely good thing.

(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

42 Responses to “Knight Unhorsed”

  1. Guest says:

    The Fat Fingered Clown strikes again!

  2. Guest says:

    Get rid of the EggHeads and bring back the Meatballs.

    NYSE Euronext Risk Quant

  3. T. M. Joyce says:

    The Chinese started this. They did it first.

  4. Deleveraging says:

    This warrents a drink on the way home!

  5. Guy with A.D.D. says:

    Down, Down, Down!
    The red knights going Down!

    -Cable guy

  6. M. Taibbi says:

    Did someone say Horse?

  7. O.W.S. says:


  8. Black Knight says:

    It's just a flesh wound!

  9. Knight Capital says:

    I use to be a successful broker but then I took a arrow to the algorithm.

  10. Jim Cramer says:

    Look Skee Daddy,

    I think these big tough HFT guys need to get wacked and leveraged ETFs need to go in the *slice* GARBAGE DUMP!!!! But that will probably never happen, so at this point all i can say is… BOOOOYAAAHHHH SKEEEEDADDDYYYYYYY!!! BUY BUY BUY

    With gentle and loving regards,

  11. Guest says:

    I knew we should have upgraded to a Pentium processor from our 286 CPU last year………..Senior Knight IT guy

  12. vp_md says:

    Scrolling furiously through Bloomberg news history, looking for the headline "Knight hires UBS equity trading team"

  13. Guest says:

    SHIT! I just spilled coffe all over my key board call out the Geek Squad ASAP!

  14. Cleaned It Up says:

    In days of old
    When Knight was bold
    And algos weren't invented.
    They bought and sold
    In the ways of old
    And everyone was contented.

  15. Guest123 says:

    Knight Knight

  16. MrLieTou says:

    Any quants looking to join a top HFT firm?

  17. Guest says:

    The Dark Knight…….Descends?

  18. Eddie says:


  19. PeterEater says:

    No Fuck YOU Billy Cox

  20. contango says:

    That's what happens when your HQ is in Jersey. Welcome to the perpetual Amateur Hour.

    – Analyst who loves going to the Four Seasons at lunch time.

  21. meagain says:

    Can someone do a quick LinkedIn search and tell me who the head of trading technology at Knight is, I want to add them to my list of connections……………..

  22. I have realized some new points from your website about desktops. Another thing I’ve always believed is that computers have become a specific thing that each residence must have for a lot of reasons. They offer convenient ways in which to organize households, pay bills, go shopping, study, tune in to music and in some cases watch tv programs. An innovative solution to complete these tasks is a computer. These desktops are mobile, small, highly effective and lightweight.

  23. Rockstrom and co reckon we’re already beyond safe limits on the first three, and not far off most of the others.

  24. saan says:

    I am appreciating it very much! Looking forward to another great article. Good luck to the author! All the best read here.

  25. lhatei says:

    Make sure you update this again soon Online Bill Consolidation

  26. lhatei says:

    of your respective exciting content. Consolidate Medical Bills

  27. lhatei says:

    could look out for much more online debt relief

  28. lhatei says:

    this RSS to my e-mail and debt consolidation

  29. reshhia007 says:

    I was talking about this the other day and I really believe the only reason I’m not sinking and this could change quickly as business (especially retail) can change very quickly, but (A) I have great art on the wall! Obviously I’m bias but I generally believe in what I sell which I guess is half the battle and (B) I’m just trying to be as positive as possible! The new location has infinitely better footfall than Hockley but still there are days when no one comes in so I’m just keeping busy and positive at every second in the day! Positive things happen to positive people right??
    term paper writers

  30. AC Servicing says:

    You have delivered a good message to everyone viewing your blog. Excellent topic you chose with proper facts and information, it will help many people. Looking forward for more articles, hope so you would post soon.

  31. Freya George says:

    amazing piece of work, very research oriented, loved every bit of it .. meet and greet Gatwick

  32. Sohaib Ahmed says:

    You have delivered a good message to everyone viewing your blog. Excellent topic you chose with proper facts and information, it will help many people. Looking forward for more articles, hope so you would post soon.