So let’s say you’re a bank and, redundantly, you are in trouble with the SEC. And you want to hire a new lawyer to get you out of that trouble, because your old lawyers got you into it. You decide, sensibly, to hire a lawyer directly from the SEC, both because those lawyers have valuable experience and contacts and because they lawyers are paid so much less than your other lawyers that they’re a bargain. Who would you rather hire:
(1) An SEC lawyer who has always been nice to you, settled cases easily, not pushed too hard on investigations, and waived collateral consequences of your repeated securities fraud, or
(2) A lawyer who has always been a huge dick to you, litigated everything to the death, made your life difficult, and taken unreasonable positions?

If you chose option (1), you probably don’t work at a bank.

This study of the SEC revolving door is actually pretty neat, though suspect for reasons Yves Smith points out.* The most important conclusion is that the prospect of leaving the SEC to go represent companies doesn’t make SEC lawyers nicer to the companies: in fact, SEC lawyers who later leave to represent clients before the SEC seem to litigate more aggressively than those who don’t. But that’s actually pretty obvious, isn’t it?

For one thing, aggressiveness correlates with ability and intelligence and hard work and the general facepunching ethos required to succeed in private industry. The SEC lawyer who goes home at five o’clock after a relaxing day of ignoring financial fraud probably won’t fit in at a bank with a fast-paced culture of committing financial fraud.

For another thing, aggressiveness creates the conditions for private-sector employment: if you are the SEC employee in charge of policing CDOs, say, and you never sue anyone over CDOs, then no one will ever need to hire you to defend their CDO cases against the SEC. The more people you sue or regulate or generally bother, the more potential clients you have.**

Most of all, aggressiveness creates the desire in your victims to be rid of you as an SEC employee. Even if you’re an unbearable jerk and an idiot and cannot be useful in defending lawsuits, if you’re annoying enough at the SEC then some bank will hire you and pay you $500,000 a year to sit in a windowless room with no internet access. Better than leaving you at the SEC to continue pestering them.

All of this is obvious enough. The conclusions you’d draw from it are mixed: on the one hand, it’s probably true that the revolving door really shouldn’t deter firm regulation and zealous investigation of financial companies, so if you like that sort of thing you shouldn’t be too troubled by the fact that everyone at the SEC hopes to one day work at Goldman Sachs. On the other hand, the revolving door’s incentives encourage regulation and enforcement optimized not to prevent fraud but to create future private employment: arcane rules and arbitrary litigation make SEC insider knowledge and contacts more valuable than clear rules and consistent enforcement.***

One more speculative conclusion is: if the private sector thinks this way, why not the government? Maybe those who want to clamp down on banks should welcome the SEC hiring Goldman Sachs alums. Aggressiveness is aggressiveness, whether applied to enforce or thwart regulation. And if they’re doing so much damage at Goldman Sachs, why not move them somewhere with, let’s say, a more mixed track record of effectiveness?

Study Questions Risk of S.E.C. Revolving Door [NYT]
Does the Revolving Door Affect the SEC’s Enforcement Outcomes? [American Accounting Association]
Dubious Study Defends SEC Revolving Door [Naked Capitalism]

* In addition to its sampling dubiousness – one portion of the SEC, relatively junior lawyers, etc. – and difficulties in extracting causation, I found most counterintuitive the claim that law firms who hire SEC lawyers don’t get better results for their clients with the SEC, and would endorse the explanation “that litigation was far from a complete picture of how ex SEC staffers could interact with the agency. It isn’t hard to imagine their highest and best use would be to settle matters quietly, meaning to forestall litigation being filed.”

** I mean, you probably can’t defend against the cases you actually brought, but just creating the fear that there’ll be more, and a template for other SEC-sters to bring them, is a good way to make yourself useful to future employers.

*** If exchanges have discretion over whether or not to break erroneous trades, then you want to hire the guy who’s a personal friend of the head of the NYSE. If it’s a bright-line rule, then nobody can save you from yourself with a phone call to Mary Schapiro on her vacation.

46 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (46)

  1. Posted by lieutenant winslow | August 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM

    the authors of that study are most widely known for their previous work denying the existence of climate change

  2. Posted by Puck It | August 6, 2012 at 12:37 PM

    Did I miss an announcement that Bess is on vacation this week?

    —Guy who thinks it's going to be a long week without posts from Bess

  3. Posted by J. Skilling | August 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    "…..For one thing, aggressiveness correlates with ability and intelligence and hard work and the general facepunching ethos required to succeed in private industry….."

    Fuckin' A!!!

  4. Posted by DSK | August 6, 2012 at 12:48 PM

    Ohh la la YES!

  5. Posted by s. freud | August 6, 2012 at 12:54 PM

    Private sector less into tranny porn. Positive selection for SEC lawyers with standard hetero/homo proclivities

  6. Posted by gust | August 6, 2012 at 12:57 PM

    it will be hard for a certain bank in Stamford to lure any lawyers with their dial-up ISP.

  7. Posted by Nervous Gentile | August 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM

    Wh.. wh… where's Bess?

  8. Posted by guest | August 6, 2012 at 1:26 PM

    Is this lady a Native American too?

  9. Posted by Matt's Shrink | August 6, 2012 at 1:31 PM

    Matt, remember that chat we had about how you're supposed to take your adderall only as prescribed? Now we don't want another episode like governance day, so let's just step away from the keyboard Matt.

  10. Posted by Puck It | August 6, 2012 at 1:35 PM

    Happy to have my fears not realized.

  11. Posted by Guest | August 6, 2012 at 2:58 PM

    "some bank will hire you and pay you $500,000 a year to sit in a windowless room with no internet access"

    Windowless room is good, but provide internet access (and no filters – that's key) and you ought to be able to hire SEC staffers for a lot less than $500k per year. Hell, they'd take a pay cut to get that sort of workplace access to porn.

  12. Posted by Anon | August 6, 2012 at 11:23 PM

    And we should probably hire the head of Goldman to the head of the SEC… or how about even more power, like a secretary of the treasury posting?

    Though I admit, Kennedy fits your line of thinking.

  13. Posted by broselv | September 1, 2012 at 7:30 AM

    Hello, i think that i saw you visited my website so i came to “return the favor”.Im trying to find things to enhance my website!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

  14. Posted by | September 1, 2012 at 4:11 PM

    A person essentially assist to make severely posts I might state. That is the first time I frequented your web page and so far? I amazed with the research you made to make this actual put up incredible. Great job!

  15. Posted by | September 1, 2012 at 4:47 PM

    I would like to express my appreciation to you for rescuing me from such a circumstance. Because of searching throughout the world wide web and getting ideas which are not powerful, I assumed my life was gone. Existing minus the strategies to the problems you’ve resolved as a result of your entire write-up is a serious case, as well as the ones which might have badly affected my career if I hadn’t come across your web site. Your natural talent and kindness in handling every part was excellent. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I hadn’t encountered such a subject like this. I’m able to at this point look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for this skilled and result oriented help. I won’t be reluctant to recommend your blog to anybody who desires support about this area.

  16. Posted by bookmarking service | September 9, 2012 at 8:14 AM

    PIvFjS I value the article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  17. Posted by Commission loophole | September 11, 2012 at 1:00 PM

    Thanks for the post. Much obliged.

  18. Posted by Andrea Marcus | September 12, 2012 at 5:25 PM

    Great article post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  19. Posted by KANSAS CITY AIR DUCT CLEANING | September 13, 2012 at 10:15 AM

    Wow, great article.Really thank you! Cool.

  20. Posted by kansas city plumber | September 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM

    Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  21. Posted by free classifieds | September 14, 2012 at 6:31 AM

    Great article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  22. Posted by Inflatable slide rental | September 17, 2012 at 10:24 AM

    Really enjoyed this blog.Really thank you! Really Great.

  23. Posted by discount of cheap Hermes Handbags from | September 17, 2012 at 10:52 AM

    What i do not understood is actually how you are now not really a lot more neatly-favored than you may be now. You are very intelligent. You realize thus significantly in the case of this topic, produced me individually imagine it from a lot of various angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be fascinated until it is something to accomplish with Girl gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. All the time care for it up!

  24. Posted by repair textured ceiling | September 18, 2012 at 11:26 AM

    I really liked your blog article. Awesome.

  25. Posted by need cash now loan | September 18, 2012 at 9:23 PM

    Really enjoyed this blog.Much thanks again. Cool.

  26. Posted by Pattaya | September 19, 2012 at 10:11 AM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the blog article. Awesome.

  27. Posted by Market Samurai discount | September 19, 2012 at 6:46 PM

    Really appreciate you sharing this post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  28. Posted by pizza coupons | September 19, 2012 at 8:44 PM

    Major thanks for the post.Really thank you! Will read on…

  29. Posted by Natural Treatment For Alopecia Areata | September 20, 2012 at 8:12 AM

    I appreciate you sharing this post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  30. Posted by what are the best horror movies | September 20, 2012 at 1:36 PM

    I think this is a real great article. Much obliged.

  31. Posted by Mortgage Broker Store | September 21, 2012 at 5:39 AM

    A big thank you for your blog article.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  32. Posted by shake table | September 21, 2012 at 6:44 AM

    Say, you got a nice blog.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  33. Posted by bad credit loans | September 22, 2012 at 12:53 AM

    I really liked your blog post.Thanks Again. Want more.

  34. Posted by paskolos | September 22, 2012 at 4:21 AM

    Wow, great post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  35. Posted by competition | September 22, 2012 at 9:21 AM

    Major thankies for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  36. Posted by Schweizer Erotikinserate | September 24, 2012 at 4:33 AM

    Say, you got a nice post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  37. Posted by free | September 25, 2012 at 9:14 AM

    Fantastic blog post.Really thank you!

  38. Posted by security drivers | September 25, 2012 at 11:34 AM

    Thanks for the article post. Fantastic.

  39. Posted by hip hop | September 25, 2012 at 2:59 PM

    Very neat blog post. Keep writing.

  40. Posted by conversational hypnosis techniques | September 25, 2012 at 9:55 PM

    Thank you ever so for you post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  41. Posted by christmas tree | September 26, 2012 at 7:09 AM

    I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  42. Posted by Vans for Sale | September 26, 2012 at 11:36 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this post.Much thanks again. Great.

  43. Posted by Louis Vuitton UK | September 29, 2012 at 12:47 AM

    pygzrmuck [url=][/url] pygzrmuck

  44. Posted by Jarkesy | October 7, 2012 at 5:43 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Really thank you! Cool.

  45. Posted by democrat | January 3, 2013 at 3:56 PM

    haha! my uncle is a lawyer for the SEC, and i think he would say that this article is just a huge generalization and inaccurate.

  46. Posted by Bram de Haas | February 2, 2013 at 9:19 AM

    This is a hilarious insight and really goes into the heart of the matter; The more people you sue or regulate or generally bother, the more potential clients you have.** I lolled pretty hard at that.