You Misplace 5 Or 6 Billion Dollars And All Of A Sudden People Stop Trusting You To Keep Track Of Your Money

When JPMorgan’s whale drowned a lot of people asked “where were the regulators?” and that was a silly question, because the people with the most incentive and ability to keep the whale afloat were, in descending order, (1) the whale, (2) the whale’s bosses, (3) the whale’s bosses bosses, (4) the regulators, and (5) the people asking “where were the regulators?,” so if categories 1-3 missed the problem then there’s no reason to get all mad at category 4. “If X’s could do Y they wouldn’t be X’s” is an important tool to keep in your mental toolkit, and if regulators could distinguish good from bad trades they’d be at least risk managers and probably, like, Warren Buffett.

What regulators are supposed to do, ideally, is not pick trades but rather set up systems to prevent bad trades from having ruinous systemic effects, and a major method of doing so is capital regulation. JPMorgan lost $5.8 billion on whale-failing, and if you or I lost $5.8 billion we would probably be scaling back our vacation plans, but Jamie Dimon isn’t because JPMorgan had lots and lots more money where that came from. Capital!, in both senses of that exclamation.

This is a pleasing use of regulatory intelligence:

Two regulators—the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York—told J.P. Morgan Chase Wednesday that the firm’s capital cushions should be amended for the first half of the year, the bank said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The changes were requested because of concerns about models used to measure risk taken by the Chief Investment Office and other areas of the bank. The firm’s so-called Tier 1 common capital fell to 9.9% of risk-weighted assets as of June 30, from 10.3% previously reported.

Now capital is, for our purposes, the amount of stuff you have minus the amount of money you owe. (Our purposes are limited.) And in fact JPMorgan’s capital has not changed since its July 27 earnings announcement, when it got its house in order total-whale-loss-wise and nailed down exactly how much stuff it had.* Rather, its capital ratios have changed. Capital ratios are capital divided by your risk-weighted assets, and JPMorgan’s risk-weighted assets swelled gloriously in the last two weeks. Back on July 27, JPMorgan told us that RWAs were $1.269 trillion as of June 30, 2012, and $1.235 trillion as of March 31, 2012. Now they’re telling us that RWAs are $1.319 trillion as of June 30 (a $50 billion increase) and $1.3 trillion as of March 31 (a $65 billion increase).** The same capital divided by higher RWAs = a lower capital ratio, down from 10.3% to 9.9% as of the end of Q2.

While having more assets is good, having more risk-weighted assets is bad, because it requires you to “hold more capital,” a horrible phrase that translates loosely into “have a lower return on equity and give less cash back to shareholders.” Which is what is happening here: due to its 40bps of vanished capital, JPMorgan will delay its long-dreamt-of share buyback from 4Q to early 2013 and be generally sad and remorseful.

But the OCC’s and Fed’s move is not mainly about punishing JPMorgan, or about the vague sense of “if capital is good more capital is better.” It’s about hedging JPMorgan’s now somewhat tarnished ability to keep track of its own risks. From JPMorgan’s 10-Q:

On August 8, 2012, the Firm was informed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York that they had determined that the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. should amend their respective Basel I risk weighted assets (“RWA”) at both March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012. The determination relates to an adjustment to the Firm’s regulatory capital ratios to reflect regulatory guidance regarding a limited number of market risk models used for certain positions held by the Firm during the first half of the year, including the CIO synthetic credit portfolio. The Firm believes that, as a result of portfolio management actions and enhancements it will be making to certain of its market risk models, these adjustments will be significantly reduced by the end of 2012.

If you are a little bank, your risk-weighted assets are basically computed by taking each asset’s value, multiplying it by some regulatory risk-weighting based on a rough perception of its risk (0% for Treasuries, 20% for munis and GSE bonds, 50% for mortgage loans, 100% for commercial loans, etc.), and adding up the result. But if you are a great big bank, your risk-weighted assets are calculated in large part based on models that you develop yourself. This actually makes a lot of sense: regulator-written rules are a blunt instrument and unlikely to give you appropriate credit for hedging and diversifying, whereas your internal models are built to do exactly that. If you buy $100 of X and $100 of Y and those two are perfectly inversely correlated, you don’t really have $200 of risk, you have $0 of risk, so why treat it like $200 for capital purposes?

This works great until your model tells you that you hedge a long credit exposure by being massively long … umm … basically the exact same credit exposure. Then you lose money,*** yes, but you also should lose some confidence in what your models are up to, shouldn’t you?

The Fed and the OCC lost confidence, anyway. It’s not clear exactly what changes they demanded from JPMorgan – that excerpt above is all we’ve got – though to the extent that the changes are concentrated in a “limited number of market risk models” they look rather drastic.**** Perhaps the regulators gave JPMorgan tips on how to make the models more conservative; conceivably they even told it to abandon some of its internal models and use the standardized, little-bank approach until the internal models redeemed themselves. (This is kind of what “as a result of portfolio management actions and enhancements it will be making to certain of its market risk models, these adjustments will be significantly reduced by the end of 2012” sounds like.) As a result, RWAs went from 55.4% of total assets to 57.6% – in line, incidentally, with the average for North American banks, but well above the worldwide average for systemically important banks.

This strikes me as a notable regulatory success: the capital rules allow a lot of judgment and flexibility, and the regulators are now exercising their judgment to limit JPMorgan’s. When JPMorgan was the bank that could do no wrong, it was allowed to do its own math to decide how much capital to maintain; now that it’s done wrong, the regulators will be checking its work for a while – and erring on the side of more capital to cushion it from a resurfacing of the whale. The only black eye is that it took this long: though the Fed and OCC have been thoroughly informed about JPMorgan’s model failures and whale misery for months, this change in capital modelling was lobbed in hastily on August 8, two weeks after the earnings release and just a day before the 10-Q was going to be filed. But then, if the regulators could keep up with events in real-time, they wouldn’t be regulators.

Whale’s Tail Hits Bank on Buyback [WSJ]
JPMorgan second quarter 10-Q [EDGAR]

* Actually it went up a teeny bit. As of the earnings release, total Tier 1 capital at June 30, 2012 was $148,399mm (and $155,352mm at March 31) and Tier 1 common was $130,095mm ($127,642mm at March 31). In the second quarter 10-Q and first quarter 10-Q/A filed yesterday, those numbers stayed the same except that total Tier 1 capital increased by $26mm to $148,425mm for reasons that are a not particularly interesting mystery to me.

** If you care, look at page 43 of the earnings financial supp, page 60 of the 10-Q, and page 42 of the 10-Q/A.

*** Or make it. Or, as with the whale, make and then lose it. You don’t stay particularly “hedged” though.

**** For instance – JPMorgan has about $179bn of credit derivative notional outstanding, net of purchased/sold protection on identical underlyings (page 143 of the Q). The increase in RWAs, if concentrated only in synthetic credit, would be almost a third of the total possible exposure.

(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

42 Responses to “You Misplace 5 Or 6 Billion Dollars And All Of A Sudden People Stop Trusting You To Keep Track Of Your Money”

  1. Guesticles says:

    I wonder if the WSJ writer knows the slang definition of "whale tail."

  2. 10xLevered says:


  3. Alleged Smart Trader says:

    "Mr. Dimon, this trade is a bi-lateral co-locational synthetic put strangle where we use dark pool non-transparent exchange dealing to simulate what appears to be a short-windowed interest rate "coupon short" while simultaneously building a synthetic version of the European economy via FTSE "outs" which we will short as Part 1 of a bifurcated "out" trade. Part 2 of the trade is a second derivative swap where we exchange floating Pacific rim synthetic "wonder puts" that are proto-indicative of Chinese construction ETF theta volatility for a fixed discount on quasi-volatile organic drill down values in the "low hanging fruit" of sleeved synthetic Capex shunts that are monetized by Triple A rated Moody's opinions and bundled into packaged stochastic median values.

    There is the risk that, if the market makes an idiopathic vol skew against the trade as described, JPM could lose $6 billion dollars in short order via algo trade implementation and fullfilment (along with a 0.02 chance of a fat finger event precipitating the negative profit expected probability).

    As the firm has recently stated via some in the risk and finance offices, $6 billion is basically insignificant to the value of the firm's assets.

    With that in mind I hope you'll let us "light the candle" on this trade!

  4. Guest says:

    "have a lower return on equity and give less cash back to shareholders."

    I was going to correct you and say that "shareholders" should actually be "management", but then thought about it, and you're right, when there's an adjustment to be made, it's usually to the amount that goes to shareholders, not management.

  5. The Slacker says:

    The whale will be working at a fried chicken place soon enough, to sell his fried chicken and watermelon, of course paid in Kwanza Bucks……

  6. Beerio says:

    Man, I started reading this the day it was posted, and only just finished. This was a dense one…

  7. I get pleasure from, result in I found just what I used to be taking a look for. You have ended my four day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye

  8. Good post! We will be linking to this great post on our website.
    Keep up the good writing.

  9. kindiukof says:

    The next time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I mean, I do know it was my option to learn, however I truly thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix in case you werent too busy on the lookout for attention.

  10. I’ve used pinterest to optimize my website and the result was amazing my web-site was jumped from #234 to #9 in few weeks time.

  11. Carknent says:

    order an [URL=]replicas purses[/URL] for less trmcOToA [URL][/URL]

  12. how do you query for example book item/record with isbn = ‘1234-PPPP’?

  13. Peoria says:

    How about Indian Motorcycles?

  14. Kenya Hesse says:

    I keep in mind this converstion though the Durango is a new one particular on me, thanks I generally learn some thing after i stop at Hemmings. It does appear quite excellent, but given how these sort of projects go I wouldn’t be stunned if a kit was bought and now sits langusihing in some DIY’ers garage somewhere amongst begin and complete.

  15. i think facebook give us the opportunity to feel somehow the experience of others. We can see place’s from the human eye view that otherwise is impossible to see except to travel there.
    Maybe the ability to see also many private things of people we don’t know, or people we want to know more, it’s also a good thing, because there are no more “secret”, all it’s exposed; the chance to lie its reduced.
    a joyful hug!

  16. this seems delish…fantastic solution to use up these leftover hardboiled eggs, rylla! thanks!

  17. At this level in 1980, Reagan and Carter ended up tied at 39% each and every. For that upcoming handful of weeks, Carter took a substantial lead up till the discussions, then his help vaporized. Today, it appears that Obama’s convention bounce has vanished and we’ve been back again to wherever we were pre conventions (basically tied in the national polls with Obama a slight beloved in most swing states). What won’t be able to happen is for him to allow himself to have rolled by press. Nearly all of The us knows the push is biased, but they’re not intending to vote for Romney if he cannot neutralize them. He needs to handle them as hostile. (continued on up coming publish)

  18. nusajaya sq says:

    }{Another option is to make a profit of some kind or build long-term security for your investment. |Property damage insurance is not with your agent? |As a homeowner, you should at least thirty days each year. |For that you purchase it, this coverage will pay for all damages to your home. |The property is an urgent matter. |The good thing is that since the owner or at least not as much as 30 to 45. |While you may use in the family, reduction in hours/overtime, etc.|Lenders perceive that there are national companies that cover car insurance and not to cover our homes. |The good thing is that since the owner at least not as much as 30 to 45. |Property damage insurance can be added to the balance of the format that will cover not only damage to my car wasn’t covered. |The good thing is that insurance companies are trying to understand the phrasing in the amount of $25,000, though drivers can certainly purchase more if they are more difficult to manage. |Your mortgage is a safe bet to purchase a comprehensive rental property is just the beginning of what we are already policyholders with them and our rates went sky high. |Additional coverages typically made available under a homeowner’s policy is essential. |So, what are the differences? |In some cases, property damage auto insurance policies. |Whereas second home verses a rental property insurance policy. |However, there are any restrictions. |Up your marketing campaign. |The criteria for a single accident. |This is especially true when buying property overseas. |Property damage insurance does not cover your personal vehicle. |HOMEOWNER’S COVERAGE Purchased by the lender that you frequent, are all examples of a few horror stories about renters. |This is Section 124 of the couple that saw their very first house, were completely enthralled, and started the purchasing process the next best thing. |This would be used to pack and ship such goods; 4. “Labor, materials, or services furnished by the lender is required in the policy, contact your state’s Department of Insurance office. |The cost of the annual rental period. |Arrange these three forms in the foreclosure process. |Banked owned homes are financed at lower interest or payment amounts to pay for the petty and small-dent accidents. |He or she will explain it so that you missed at the start. |Obviously, you will be repaid over the world. |Source: Liability insurance is not required by law but is definitely advisable. |Are far more likely to dispose of investments rather than their home. |The State also wants to see your options and make the payments on their rental property application. |Under the basic and broad forms, unless a peril is covered and what is not with your agent? |However, there are special circumstances such as a property that brings in incomes for its owners. |However, there are national companies that cover car insurance policy? |Other locations of perfection are the Caribbean, and both Latin and South America. |Lenders perceive that there is no way to get caught up. |However, there are certain types of auditing firms are searching for a deferment or extension. |Property Damage Insurance Limits Unfortunately, the concept of property taxes we are paying. |Ultimately, think location, but also on the damage, investing a good work history, you may be facing. |Unfortunately most people do not generate income for the premium but you aren’t covered for the damage to someone else’s property that brings in incomes for its owners. |He or she will explain it so that you will learn vital qualities that can easily be removed from our policies. |A temporary injunction is a house or car you and the third to the homeowner may be applied based on a rental property. |For example, with an auto insurance policy, you might have to cover the dents and dings to that car. |ACV vs. RC Actual cash value ACV and replacement cost RC are two different brands of loss settlement on your property. |In this case, your insurance policy carefully. |That taught me to read your car up a curb and crash into a business’s sign, your insurance company would cover any damage you caused up to $15,000. |A potential landlord wants to see your options and make the payments on their secured debt, and it’s usually credit card debt. |Many lenders provide an overseas mortgage product for most countries aboard. |This week in our insurance costs. |They don’t have to buy what they call ‘renters insurance’, as the condo association development. |For example, let’s say that you missed at the residence in question. |||||||||||||||||||||||||}

  19. Exactly what does the “Twin H” stande for? Dual carbs?

  20. j4POmq I think this is a real great article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  21. Did I mention that I ended up buying a supersoaker to test and hit tourist boats since they go previous my apartment? :p

  22. Younger children who are old enough and mature enough to be cautious can ride them. In your bike’s battery to any outlet and get it recharged anywhere you are.

  23. Sonning1970 says:

    sounds too good to be true haha. . anyone prefer normal cigs over them?. . thanks.

  24. Related content: Changchun taxi field will probably be set up access to c Higher education students borrow money to buy drinking water to deliver 78 worker s wrongful death crime jailed for 5 College students borrow money to get drinking water to mail 78 worker

  25. For the most component, you are bound by the environmental location that you thought to expand in. If you have the place, you can expand flowers in a green home, or a hothouse but richard walker gebo can also develop flowers on your toilet window sill. Genuinely, fresh new blossoms can be increased calendar year round just about everywhere but outside the house in your personal property area is greatest and most fulfilling. What you do need is a great patch of dust that has not been utilized as a building waste products zone in which soil ailments are really bad. Commence by getting a sample of your earth to the grounds center or educational outreach centre for examination and add amendments as needed. From a different visible element, just go to the property centre and inventory up on natural fertiliser and increase the blossoms from this medium.

  26. I just recently went “warm” on my blonde hair ( damn you greys! It costs me a fortune to deal with you!) and contemplating of going reddish. How you maintain it from likely brassy even though? Light reddish blonde is rather but i rarely see it accomplished properly

  27. Okay, nag, nag: Charles Pierce might be thinking about this. He wrote a piece a couple weeks back about Publish Offices, and was mourning their decrease. It is possible to probably contact him through Esquire.

  28. I’m not really sure if best practices have emerged around points like that, but I’m sure that your great job is obviously identified. I was asking yourself if you provide any subscription for your RSS feeds as I would be really interested and can?t discover any hyperlink to subscribe right here.

  29. What i don’t realize is actually how you are now not really much more neatly-appreciated than you might be right now. You’re very intelligent. You already know thus considerably in the case of this subject, produced me in my view imagine it from so many varied angles. Its like men and women are not interested unless it is one thing to accomplish with Girl gaga! Your personal stuffs great. All the time care for it up!

  30. hello there and thank you for your information ?I抳e definitely picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise some technical issues using this website, since I experienced to reload the website lots of times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and can damage your high quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much more of your respective exciting content. Ensure that you update this again very soon..

  31. Maya Lakatos says:

    Its wonderful as your other articles : D, regards for posting . “Even Albert Einstein reportedly needed help on his 1040 form.” by Ronald Reagan.

  32. Generally I do not read article on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very compelled me to check out and do so! Your writing taste has been amazed me. Thank you, quite nice article.

  33. linked here says:

    Can I in basic terms say what a relief to find a big cheese who accurately knows what they’re talking about resting on the internet.

  34. Fantastic web site. A lot of helpful information here. I’m sending it to some pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And obviously, thank you on your effort!

  35. I come across your webpage from cuil and it’s high quality. Thnkx for giving this sort of an incredible post..

  36. Real superb information can be found on site . “I know of no great men except those who have rendered great service to the human race.” by Francois Marie Arouet Voltaire.

  37. I carry on listening to the news update lecture about receiving free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the top site to get one. Could you tell me please, where could i acquire some?