LBOs Are Back, But Not For Everyone

If you’re trying to sell a company there are two basic but opposite approaches. In one, you approach the best buyer, negotiate exclusively, and generally do what you can to get them to put their best foot forward in exchange for not having the headache of a multi-round, winner’s-cursed, might-get-topped-by-a-penny auction. In the other, you just run the auction and hope for the winner to get cursed, at the risk that the best bidders won’t play, or won’t bid aggressively, because they’ve been here before and understand the dynamic. There’s no approach that is just a priori right; you have long heart-to-hearts with your banker and look at unilluminating comp sets and feel out your best-bet bidders and then sort of take a guess about what’s the right thing to do.

There is an asymmetry here, though: if you do the exclusive approach, you get lots and lots of sued, because think of all the people you could have asked to bid but didn’t (and scared away with breakup fees or whatever). If you do the auction approach, you’re less likely to get sued, because it’s harder to think of all the people who you did ask to bid but who refused because they didn’t want to be winner’s-cursed. The fact that negotiated deals still happen is a testament either to boards’ and bankers’ commitment to shareholder value, or to the fact that those negotiated deals really are as conflicted as plaintiffs’ lawyers say they are and the boards and bankers are pursuing their own selfish agendas.

Anyway LBOs are back:

Total U.S. LBO volumes reached $28.87 billion in the third quarter through September 18, up 96 percent from the same period last year and outperforming a 32 percent growth in global leveraged buyouts, Thomson Reuters data shows. … “There is enough liquidity and capacity in the high-yield market to empower financial sponsors to be aggressive in auction processes and, as a result, we’re seeing robust competitive tension in recent sale processes,” said [Barclays sponsors head John] Miller.

Which is nice!1 But mega-LBOs are not:

“Every once in a while you might see a large mega-deal, but I tend to think that very large deals will be more of the exception rather than the rule moving forward,” said Kewsong Lee, managing director at private equity firm Warburg Pincus LLC.

“The liquidity is there to pull together the debt, but general partners (GPs) just don’t want to write $1.5 to $2 billion commitments and fund them anymore because fund sizes are smaller and a lot of GPs have figured out that partnering in large consortia has been more difficult than not,” Lee said.

Limited partners also are not sure they love the dynamics of these types of mega deals anymore, he added.

This quote is full of meaning. LPs don’t love the dynamics for various reasons, one of them being perhaps that they invest with Warburg Pincus, or whoever, so that Warburg Pincus can use its smarts to find deals, not just to co-invest with every other PE firm that the LPs invest with. Private equity: the last bastion of non-index investing. Similarly, partnering in large consortia has been difficult for lots of reasons, including that, I mean, would you want to work with a bunch of private equity guys? If you’re looking to ruthlessly manage a business and drive efficiencies, you don’t want to do it via a committee with half a dozen similarly motivated competitors.

But it’s fun to think that one reason may be the fact that the last time there were lots of private-equity consortium deals, everyone got investigated and sued for antitrust violations. That’s got to make everyone a bit more careful about partnering up, at least without explicit permission from the target and a careful paper trail reflecting that permission. At the margin, you’d expect that to lead to fewer club deals, and in particular to fewer firms looking at the sorts of big deals where clubbing might be necessary. You don’t want to get far along on a $20 billion buyout and then realize that you can’t split the equity check.

Which is great, I suppose, will say the people suing the private equity firms over their 2007-era clubbing. Why should the private equity firms join up to buy a company? They should bid independently, and the company should be free to figure out how to get the most value out of them, whether by allowing clubbing or forcing a harshly competitive auction. That’s the best way to maximize shareholder value.

And, maybe. The evidence that we have is that big companies aren’t getting bought out at anticompetitive, too-low premiums. They’re not getting bought out at all, at any premiums. You could imagine that collusively low premiums might still be better than no premiums, in which case you might wonder whether this result is good for shareholders.

Cheap financing fuels U.S. leveraged buyout boom [Reuters]

1. And an important corrective to the thing I wrote yesterday about how the piling up of corporate debt isn’t that scary. The piling up of LBO debt maybe is.

21 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (21)

  1. Posted by Bugs | September 21, 2012 at 6:47 PM

    Even in California it's way too late in the day with charts or something to add a bit of interest. and the footnote is paltry.

  2. Posted by Bugs | September 21, 2012 at 6:49 PM

    Without charts, of course. Reading it made me woozy.

  3. Posted by guest | September 21, 2012 at 7:15 PM

    Among other dynamics of mega-deals the LPs don't like? That the investment pros will do them just for the deal and monitoring fees (which in a big deal can have a PV well into the 8 figures), and be satisfied with less than stellar returns on equity.

    – An LP

  4. Posted by @FinancierGuru | September 22, 2012 at 11:47 AM

    Clubbing it's got the drawback of same returns to the LPs-why would LPs invest in those groups, if they've got the same targets ? Returns should be spread out to attract LPs

  5. Posted by cheap bookmarking service | September 24, 2012 at 1:34 AM

    ZAKzpM Say, you got a nice blog post.Much thanks again.

  6. Posted by crork | September 24, 2012 at 1:37 AM

    WotxcK Thank you ever so for you blog article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  7. Posted by bookmarking submission | September 24, 2012 at 1:38 AM

    V7bzzS Thanks again for the article post. Great.

  8. Posted by crork | September 24, 2012 at 1:39 AM

    gyrJKp Thanks for the post.Much thanks again.

  9. Posted by cheap seo services | September 24, 2012 at 1:43 AM

    koutmb Really enjoyed this article.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  10. Posted by bookmarking service | September 24, 2012 at 1:47 AM

    BHSUyB Thanks for the blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  11. Posted by bookmarking submission | September 24, 2012 at 1:54 AM

    YsE54d Appreciate you sharing, great article post.Much thanks again. Cool.

  12. Posted by cheap bookmarking service | September 24, 2012 at 1:55 AM

    VZS3ay Great post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  13. Posted by cheap bookmarking service | September 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM

    xP4L5N Im thankful for the article.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  14. Posted by Scott Sprout | September 25, 2012 at 10:53 AM

    I used to be recommended this blog by way of my cousin. I am now not sure whether or not this submit is written by him as no one else recognise such precise approximately my difficulty. You are amazing! Thank you!

  15. Posted by Jeremy Scott | September 27, 2012 at 2:33 AM

    I have seen lots of useful points on your internet site about pcs. However, I’ve got the impression that netbooks are still more or less not powerful enough to be a option if you generally do things that require lots of power, like video touch-ups. But for world wide web surfing, microsoft word processing, and the majority of other prevalent computer work they are all right, provided you do not mind the small screen size. Many thanks for sharing your opinions.

  16. Posted by link building | October 1, 2012 at 3:08 AM

    My brother recommended I might like this website. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!
    link building

  17. Posted by skitty poop | October 6, 2012 at 4:03 AM

    Love your blog!

  18. Posted by binary calls | January 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM

    Great blog indeed :)

  19. Posted by macam sepatu vans | June 10, 2013 at 10:45 AM

    greet blog i like :*

  20. Posted by Agen IBCBET | June 19, 2013 at 10:52 AM

    I must say This post contains very useful information which help me a lot, Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful.
    Jasa SEO

  21. Posted by sbobet | July 7, 2013 at 7:48 AM

    No, you wrong, Lbos back for everyone in this world