Banks, News

Morgan Stanley Doesn’t Want To Share Custody Of Smith Barney Any More

Buried in a footnote1 a while back I ruminated on the fact that, in the deal where Morgan Stanley bought a chunk of its Morgan Stanley Smith Barney brokerage JV from Citigroup, Morgan Stanley got a sort-of-free option to buy the rest of Smith Barney, and how that option is (1) valuable and (2) sort of cheap funding. That was basically all wrong, sorry! The lesson is, never read footnotes.

Charlie Gasparino is reporting that “Morgan Stanley chief James Gorman is making a full-court press with regulators to expedite the purchase of the remaining piece of the Smith Barney brokerage firm from Citigroup, moving up the buyout date as much as two years ahead of schedule,” so I guess Gorman puts the time value of that option at zero or less. As for cheap funding, Goldman had a research note this week saying that they met with Morgan Stanley and heard the same story, and also that:

At the margin, full MSSB ownership should have a meaningful impact on ROE as: 1) MS is still paying Citigroup a portion of earnings from the JV despite holding capital to support the entire business, 2) synergies with the Institutional Securities business will grow (i.e. client flow routing), and 3) the funding profile and client product offering mix will improve.

I think the second two things say something like “Citi won’t appreciate us shoving all of our MSSB customers into high-margin Morgan Stanley products, so we have to get rid of them before doing that,” though you could read them otherwise. The first thing calls the cheap-funding argument into some doubt, though maybe not that much doubt; Morgan Stanley’s capital is by some metrics cheaper than Citi’s, while its (credit market) funding is more expensive, so maybe this is still a good deal.

Anyway here’s what Gasparino has to say about the delay:

One concern the Fed has is whether Morgan Stanley, the smallest of the big financial firms, has a large enough capital cushion to snap up the remaining piece of Smith Barney and remain compliant with new banking regulations such as Dodd Frank and the Basel agreement.

One isn’t-it-ironic-dontcha-think response here might be: well, since Citi took a huge hit to income and capital by writing down MSSB to the $13.5bn valuation at which MS is buying it, couldn’t MS have expedited the process by paying more? (That is, if it’s worth an extra $1 billion, then that gives MS an extra $510 million of capital, because it owned 51% of MSSB before this deal. At MS’s ~7% tangible equity to assets, that would support $7 billion more of purchase price.) But of course it doesn’t work that way, or it only half works that way. Here is Citi’s 8-K on the deal:

Citi expects the loss on sale and the impairment charge will impact its third quarter 2012 reported tangible book value and common equity by approximately $2.9 billion (based on the after-tax amount of the total charge). Further, the loss on sale and the impairment charge would have had a negative impact on Citi’s second quarter 2012 Basel 1 Tier 1 regulatory capital ratios of approximately 37 basis points (based on the pre-tax amount of the total charge). The impairment will not impact Citi’s estimated Basel III capital position; however, the sale of the 14% Interest to Morgan Stanley is expected to add approximately 14 basis points to Citi’s estimated Tier 1 Common regulatory capital ratio for Basel III capital purposes.

So that was super boring but the gist is: for Basel I, the valuation of MSSB matters for regulatory capital; for Basel III, it doesn’t.2 Which one applies? I feel like that is the wrong question, or that the answer is everything applies, as you can sort of tell by the fact that Morgan Stanley is discussing whether it has a “large enough capital cushion” with the Fed rather than just showing the Fed some math that shows that it does. A lower MSSB valuation reduces Citi’s capital, but a higher one doesn’t increase Morgan Stanley’s, because the working metric is kind of min(Basel I, Basel III). This means (1) that the MSSB transaction was in some sense net destructive of bank capital, which is kind of weird, and (2) that the Fed gets to do what it wants to increase systemic stability without worrying about Basel-whatever math.

Which I’m still not sure should hurt Gorman’s chances. Basically his argument here is “dear Fed, help Morgan Stanley transition from a risky FICC trading operation to a delightfully steady retail brokerage, while also helping Citi transition from a sprawling confused bank to a slightly smaller, slightly less confused bank with a bit more cash.” That … seems like a good systemic-stability pitch, no?

Morgan Stanley CEO Working to Speed Up Smith Barney Purchase [FBN]

1. LOOK AT THAT DIRECT LINK. That’s service.

2. See also page 18 here if you’re interested.

82 comments
(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

82 Responses to “Morgan Stanley Doesn’t Want To Share Custody Of Smith Barney Any More”

  1. Guest says:

    Site seems awkwardly plain. Never thought I'd say this….but I miss Bonobos.

  2. Brad Brad Brad says:

    "The lesson is, never read footnotes."

    Matt – how could you say such hurtful things!?

  3. This is my very first time i check out here. I found so several entertaining stuff inside your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your posts, I guess I’m not the only 1 having all the enjoyment here! Keep up the superb function.

  4. MUEA3j I value the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  5. hoos3h A big thank you for your blog post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  6. vP6eOz Im grateful for the blog post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  7. aQDnUL Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  8. Oxm6ID Thanks-a-mundo for the blog article.Really thank you! Great.

  9. mh5mPU Looking forward to reading more. Great post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  10. szSS8T Im obliged for the blog post. Cool.

  11. LiiPde Thank you for your article post.Much thanks again. Want more.

  12. crork says:

    4pi5Sr I really like and appreciate your blog article.Really looking forward to read more.

  13. FjbE5e I appreciate you sharing this article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  14. tgeKhU I value the blog. Will read on…

  15. crork says:

    WUU1Ur Thanks for the blog post. Really Cool.

  16. D1ofLl This is one awesome article. Awesome.

  17. uF4lr2 Thanks so much for the blog post. Much obliged.

  18. VtFfZ0 Very good article post.Really thank you! Want more.

  19. mg1OV5 Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  20. crork says:

    Y4ZJcp Thanks for the blog.Really thank you! Cool.

  21. crork says:

    2hbRhV Really enjoyed this blog article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  22. crork says:

    V7MwXG Thanks a lot for the article.Much thanks again. Great.

  23. l3aOiU wow, awesome article. Cool.

  24. P2J4ri I really enjoy the blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  25. 9o5LbT Really informative blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  26. crork says:

    PCBJqr Really informative blog article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  27. 4MRpns I really like and appreciate your blog post.Thanks Again. Great.

  28. TIMLeU Thanks so much for the article.Much thanks again.

  29. crork says:

    7xKXrS A round of applause for your blog. Great.

  30. I think this is a real great article. Really Cool.

  31. Thanks so much for the blog article.Really thank you!

  32. I really liked your blog post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  33. webdesign says:

    I really like and appreciate your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  34. Appreciate you sharing, great article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  35. Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Really thank you! Will read on…

  36. Major thankies for the blog.Really thank you! Great.

  37. Thanks again for the article post.Really thank you! Cool.

  38. Really informative article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  39. Really enjoyed this blog article. Really Great.

  40. euko koxp says:

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article. Awesome.

  41. I am so grateful for your blog article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  42. Fantastic post. Really Cool.

  43. I really like and appreciate your blog article.Really thank you! Cool.

  44. car tint says:

    I am so grateful for your post.Much thanks again. Want more.

  45. td dresses says:

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  46. Thanks for the blog post.Really thank you! Great.

  47. Enjoyed every bit of your blog post.Thanks Again. Want more.

  48. Rikki Wyler says:

    It will be quite good for Gingrich to campaign for Romney. He’s aggressive, intelligent, and a terrific speaker. Romney needs someone to inform off that consummate liar Obama. Tell him off with aggressive gusto. Gingrich can perform it. Get out there Newt, we have to have you. n

  49. wow, awesome article.Thanks Again.

  50. Really enjoyed this article.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  51. Really informative article post.Much thanks again. Cool.

  52. Thank you for your post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  53. Very neat article post.Really looking forward to read more.

  54. Enjoyed every bit of your blog.Much thanks again. Want more.

  55. I truly appreciate this blog.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  56. Fantastic article post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  57. Great blog. Keep writing.

  58. buy vpn says:

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article.Really thank you! Will read on…

  59. ink says:

    I appreciate you sharing this article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  60. I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  61. Hiya! I simply want to give an enormous thumbs up for the good data you might have right here on this post. I can be coming back to your blog for more soon.

  62. traffic buy says:

    Wow, great blog.Really thank you!

  63. date men says:

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  64. I cannot thank you enough for the blog article. Keep writing.

  65. Thanks so much for the article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  66. VPS Server says:

    I loved your blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

  67. I value the article post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  68. Muchos Gracias for your blog article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  69. I appreciate you sharing this post.

  70. bath mate says:

    Very neat blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  71. sex cams says:

    I loved your blog.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  72. Really enjoyed this blog article.Thanks Again. Want more.

  73. Major thanks for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  74. Thank for your blog. It is Goood, Hope more for it. [url=http://www.nylon-rod.com]PTFE[/url] [url=http://www.fluoroplastic.cn]PTFE[/url] [url=http://www.teflonrod.cn]teflonrod[/url]

  75. PTFE SHEET says:

    HI, Thank for your blog. I love your blog. Hope more !! [url=http://www.PTFE-SHEET.com]PTFE SHEET[/url] [url=http://www.AUTAI.com]PTFE[/url]

  76. Really enjoyed this blog post.Really thank you! Great.

  77. infrared mat says:

    Im obliged for the post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  78. I cannot thank you enough for the blog post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  79. Looking forward to reading more. Great article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  80. sohbet says:

    Chair, I will bail out strippers. The rest of the argument becomes irrelevant because the world will be a kinder happier place with more strippers. And, hence, the U.S. shall maintain world leadership in porn by preserving the efficiencies of a an