advice, Citigroup, SAC Capital, slow your roll toots
Grand Wizard Cohen never needed a 10 to 1reverse stock split to dupe investors into buying a penny stock/zombie bank
Can we get that on the disclosure?
Now that there's been talk of Wells notices, etc. – if anything bad DOES happen, Citi will be held partially liable. So less "we don't trust SAC" and more "avoid the lawsuit".
Are you sure Bloomberg has the order of "Citigroup" and "SAC" correct in that sentence?
yes, Citi is now recommending all clients go all into Old Lane
SAC said to not give a flying fuck what Citi says.
Since when is Citi not in the business of fleecing people?
But yet they are never too good for the shaft.
Dave Brubeck > SAC Capital
So, SAC will be fine then.
SAC said advised Citi clients against adding money to Citi
SAC is screwed. There is no way that outfit can stand up to the Feds and Citigroup at the same time. Plus it's the holidays and people are fat.
SAC must merge with Rochdale in order to survive.
The ashtray, this paddle game, and the remote control, and the lamp, and these matches, that's all I need.
I just sat down too quickly and something bad happened.
I have a really hot tip from someone inside that SAC is in trouble for insider trading. Don't add to SAC!
-Citi meta-insider trader
I think the bigger story here is that Citi has clients that could get SAC.
Reminds me of the time the janitor at Starbucks warned me that this week's chef's tasting menu at Per Se was not up to snuff.
Bonus Watch ’16: Local Hooker Should Be Getting Paid Extra For This
You want to b*tch about your bonus? That’s another $500.
Get the latest financial news, headlines, commentary, and analysis when you subscribe to Dealbreaker.