• 20 Dec 2012 at 11:01 AM

GM Is Buying Some Stock

One thing to savor about Treasury’s plan to get out of GM is how many corporate-governance hot buttons it gently caresses. “GM will purchase 200 million shares of GM common stock from Treasury at $27.50 per share” translates into news reports as “Treasury is losing a bazillion dollars,” since after all Treasury paid rather more than $27.50 per share originally, but there are other ways to look at it. One is that Treasury seems to have agreed a deal with GM after the 12/18 close at $27.50 for a stock that had closed at $25.49 and hasn’t touched $27 in ten months; i.e. GM overpaid for stock from a favored/nudgy insider by $400mm. Normally, privately negotiated buybacks from favored shareholders at a premium to market prices are criticized. Normally, privately negotiated buybacks from nudgy, “ooh-don’t-buy-a-corporate-jet” activist shareholders are called greenmail.

That doesn’t mean such buybacks aren’t market-pleasing, by the way. Much like Buffett’s recent slightly-above-market buyback, GM’s above-market buyback seems to have boosted the stock. Delightfully part of the boost is accounting-related. From the Journal:

GM’s repurchase will be accretive to earnings per share, reducing the auto maker’s total shares outstanding by about 11%. GM expects to take a charge of approximately $400 million in the fourth quarter, which will be treated as a special item.

Got it? Getting rid of shares reduces shares outstanding and is accretive to EPS. It’s somewhat less accretive when you overpay for the shares by $400mm and that $400mm is a charge to income. But at least you can call it a special item.

While EPS accretion is nice, the 300mm shares that will be flooding the market are arguably not so nice for other shareholders in the near term. (Or perhaps they are?) That in turn is not so nice for the selling shareholder – the government – who would presumably have to sell at a discount to last trade, as it did when it sold AIG shares earlier this month. But the government may have a plan to minimize that friction:

Treasury intends to sell its other remaining 300.1 million shares through various means in an orderly fashion within the next 12-15 months, subject to market conditions. Treasury intends to begin its disposition of those 300.1 million common shares as soon as January 2013 pursuant to a pre-arranged written trading plan. The manner, amount, and timing of the sales under the plan are dependent upon a number of factors.

Hee hee hee. To avoid getting picked off by the market, Treasury is going to put in place a 10b5-1 plan. You know, one of those things that the SEC is supposed to be investigating because of how insiders are using to manipulate markets and disguise their trading intentions.

These hot buttons aren’t fully pressed, of course; it’s more of a glancing touch. The appropriate response, of course, is “shut up, it’s the government, they’re not supposed to be nice accommodating major shareholders with fiduciary duties to the company and the market; they’re supposed to be doing governmenty things.” This is more or less the answer that a court gave in dismissing Hank Greenberg’s lawsuit against the government over the AIG bailouts. Acting as a Federal instrumentality – saving the world, the financial system, or just the auto industry, as the case may be – preempts, legally and perhaps spiritually or whatever, your more prosaic responsibilities as a shareholder and market participant.

And of course that answer is right. Treasury is not a regular market participant; it, as it were, answers to a higher power. It’s a lot more palatable for Treasury to sell to the company at a premium, or to sell to the market opaquely, than it would be for a regular insider. Perhaps it should also be more palatable for Treasury to sell at a loss.

Treasury Announces Intent to Fully Exit GM Investment Within the Next 12-15 Months [Treasury]
GM to buy stake from Treasury; government may lose billions [Reuters]
GM to Buy Back $5.5 Billion in Stock From Treasury [WSJ]

7 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (7)

  1. Posted by PermaGuestII | December 20, 2012 at 11:18 AM

    Why can't we build cars like *that* anymore?

  2. Posted by Guest | December 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM

    Where footnotes? WHERE FOOTNOTES?!

  3. Posted by Footnote Local #*** | December 20, 2012 at 12:19 PM

    Our union's on strike until we get better benefits and Matt agrees to stop investing our 401(k) in extremely risky, tailor made derivatives contracts that he enters into purely because he thinks they're structure is somewhere on the spectrum of "interesting" to "it moved."

  4. Posted by ML Posts > MBA > CFA | December 20, 2012 at 12:20 PM

    Wow, this is an awful lot of Matt before noon, thanks for ramping it up around that holiday dead-zone.

  5. Posted by Odessa Gentleman | December 20, 2012 at 12:35 PM

    Those were the days! You could bang a fat waitress from a Truckstop of America in the back of a Coupe DeVille and not get a leg cramp while leaning over the front seat and changing the 8-track!

    -West Texas Crude Oil Buyer of a Certain Age

  6. Posted by Little Fritz | December 20, 2012 at 2:13 PM

    Yeah, too much. Hangover from the Holiday Party and all this from Matt is making my life a living hell.

    Next, Charts.

  7. Posted by LetsBreel | December 20, 2012 at 2:13 PM

    You've said it all Matt. Left me with nothing to post but a tired old mis-quoted line from Glengarry Glen Ross and this recipe for ginger bread cookies. Think I'm gonna save those for later, though. Think you could put all of this into a chart for us. That'd be great.