News

AIG Directors Could Barely Get Through A Morning Of Pretending They Might Sue The Government

Remember yesterday when AIG was going to sue the government for bailing it out? Hahaha yeah that was never going to happen, and today it didn’t:

American International Group Inc.’s directors decided Wednesday not to participate in a lawsuit that accuses the U.S. government of taking advantage of the company in its rescue from the financial crisis. … “The AIG Board has determined to refuse Starr’s demand in its entirety, and will neither pursue these claims itself nor permit Starr to pursue them in AIG’s name,” the company said in a release. …

Mindful of the potential backlash, a number of AIG directors entered Wednesday’s meeting leaning toward rejecting Starr’s request to join its suit, two people familiar with their thinking said

YOU THINK?

If you read as much of the Internet as I do, you probably noticed that a lot of people yesterday freaked the fuck out over the pseudo-fact that AIG was considering joining the lawsuit, brought by its ex-CEO Hank Greenberg and his investment company Starr International, against the U.S. government for basically being too mean in bailing out AIG. Some of these people were regulators, Senators, and Congressmen, three of whom penned this cheery missive to AIG:

According to The New York Times, AIG is actively considering suing the U.S. government for monetary damages after American taxpayers rescued your company from its reckless conduct with a $182 billion bailout.

Don’t do it.

Don’t even think about it.

“Don’t even think” is about the advice you’d expect to get from a Congressman, but it is not great advice for a corporate directors, who after all are tasked with thinking carefully and deliberately about things affecting their shareholders. AIG’s directors, as various cooler heads reminded everyone yesterday, actually had a fiduciary duty to think about Greenberg’s lawsuit, and had committed to do so as part of an ongoing federal court case. They didn’t just wake up one day and decide to put “sue government” on the agenda.

To be fair to the freakout brigade, this was not necessarily obvious. If you just hear “AIG is spending Wednesday morning debating whether to sue the government,” your natural conclusion might well be, “assholes.” To reach the correct conclusion – “oh, yeah, I suppose they’re obliged to give Greenberg a hearing, but they’re not going to actually sue the government, that would be insane” – you’d have to know a little bit about the law of Delaware shareholder derivative lawsuits, and as I said yesterday,1 that is such a boring thing to know about that it’s easy to forgive even a Congressman for not knowing about it.

Nonetheless, you are smarter and more devoted to the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake than Congressmen are, so I’m going to tell you about derivative lawsuits. Or rather Carole F. Wilder is, because she already wrote about it in the Pace Law Review in 1985 and what am I, gonna explain derivative lawsuits? No I am not. Here she is:

A shareholder derivative suit is an action brought by a corporate shareholder on behalf of the corporation to enforce a corporate right that the officers and directors of the corporation have failed to enforce. In bringing a derivative suit, a shareholder is asserting that the corporation was harmed, that the corporate officers and directors failed to take action to redress that harm, and that the corporate cause of action has therefore accrued to the corporation’s shareholders in place of its directors. …

One of the oldest and most important of the[] procedural rules [applicable to derivative suits] is the requirement that prior to instituting a derivative action a shareholder must make a demand on the board of directors to bring the suit. Once demand has been made and rejected, the burden is on the plaintiff shareholder to show why the directors’ decision not to take action should not be respected by the court. Only rarely have courts allowed shareholders to proceed with a derivative suit after a rejected demand. … In these circumstances, some courts have allowed shareholders to proceed with the derivative action, despite director opposition, on the theory that the directors in such cases were either too self-interested or too controlled by the alleged wrongdoers to make a valid business decision to dismiss the suit.2

I quote this for two reasons. First of all, to show why it was so important for AIG’s board to actually have a mock trial this morning – to give Greenberg a real chance to make his best case, so that if the directors said no the court wouldn’t second-guess them for not “mak[ing] a valid business decision.” Thus AIG’s careful listing – to the court that is hearing Greenberg’s lawsuit – of the procedures it would follow, with written submissions from Greenberg and the government, oral argument, and then deliberation among the board. The goal was to create a good record of careful deliberation.

But the second reason to understand the rules is to show how counterproductive the Congressional-regulatory freakout was. All AIG had to do was give Greenberg a careful and dispassionate hearing, wait a week to make it seem like they were thinking hard about his arguments, and then sometime before their self-imposed end-of-January deadline notify the court that they were not joining Greenberg’s lawsuit. That would pretty much be that: Greenberg would have a tough time making out that AIG had not made a “valid business decision” to dismiss the suit, so the suit would be dismissed.3

But now … what now? I will tell you what now. Actually David Boies will tell you what now:

David Boies, who represents Starr, said in an email that his team believes the AIG board’s move “is contrary to the shareholders’ interests.” He said Starr would seek to pursue the claims AIG opted not to back. Whether the AIG board “will be successful in blocking Starr’s efforts to recover damages for their shareholders will ultimately be decided” by the court, he said.

And what will David Boies be saying to the court? I’ll tell you that too. He’ll say that “the directors’ decision not to take action should not be respected by the court.” He’ll say that AIG’s directors “were either too self-interested or too controlled by the alleged wrongdoers to make a valid business decision to dismiss the suit.” He’ll say that “the directors are personally involved or interested in the alleged wrongdoing so that they stand in a ‘dual relation’ to the corporation, which would impair their business judgment or reflect bad faith.” And he’ll base that on the fact that they were threatened and called names and made pariahs and subjected to “ad hominem attacks”4 for even considering joining Greenberg’s lawsuit.

And he’ll note that, despite their promises to the court of “further deliberation” and a “process … designed to ensure to the maximum extent possible that AIG’s Board will have the information and time necessary to make an informed decision on the difficult issues raised by Starr’s demand,” the board made its decision within hours after – and, from news accounts, probably before – this morning’s mock trial. And that they threw their promised deliberative process out the window under pressure.

And he’ll sort of have a point, no? And Greenberg’s lawsuit will drag on. Which is kind of the best he could have hoped for. AIG wasn’t going to join his lawsuit! Really! No matter what any politicians did or didn’t say about it! But what they did say about it, and the results of their pressure, gives him a chance to continue it anyway.

AIG Won’t Join Greenberg Lawsuit [WSJ]
A.I.G. Says It Will Not Join Lawsuit Against Government [DealBook]
Lawmakers Warn A.I.G. Not to Join Lawsuit Against U.S. [DealBook]

1. In the course of reaching that correct conclusion, by the way, not to brag or anything.

2. A footnote reads in part:

To maintain the suit despite director opposition, the shareholder must show that the suit satisfies the classic test for appropriate derivative action described in Hawes v. Oakland … In addition, the Supreme Court and lower federal courts following it, have held that the decision whether to enforce a corporate cause of action in the courts is ordinarily a business decision that should be left to the discretion of the directors unless the directors are personally involved or interested in the alleged wrongdoing so that they stand in a “dual relation” to the corporation, which would impair their business judgment or reflect bad faith.

Everything I know about excessive footnoting I learned from law reviews.

3. Except, again, as to some claims that Greenberg was asserting directly as a shareholder, rather than derivatively on behalf of AIG. Which are not nothing.

4. Most of the quote marks in that paragraph are from Wilder’s description of derivative-suit law, but “ad hominem attacks” really is Boies’s, from his USA Today piece yesterday. He doesn’t explain what hominem those attacks were ad, which is odd because most of the press and political fury was of the form “we hate AIG for this,” not “we hate individual AIG directors.” But the phrasing is tactical: Boies wants to create the impression that AIG’s directors voted against suing for personal reasons, because they were threatened/berated/etc. themselves, and not for corporate reasons. “Let’s not sue because if we do everyone will hate our company and won’t do business with us” is actually a perfectly good business reason not to join Greenberg’s suit. “Let’s not sue because if we do everyone will think that we personally, the directors, are dicks” is not.

92 comments
(hidden for your protection)
Show all comments

92 Responses to “AIG Directors Could Barely Get Through A Morning Of Pretending They Might Sue The Government”

  1. Big Fan of Congress says:

    Well done, members of Congress! Not like any of you should know anything about the process playing out with AIG's board. Only 2 of the 3 of you who signed that letter are attorneys. Not to mention that all of you vote on federal laws for a living, and therefore maybe should have at least a passing familiarity with corporate law in the state that's the legal home to a plurality of large US corporations. So, you are idiots, shameless publicity-seekers, or (most likely) both – exactly why I so like our elected representatives in Washington.

  2. Rex Ryan, JD, CFA says:

    Matt's footnoting > Law review footnoting > If UBS does footnotes, those I guess, meh.

  3. Quant me maybe says:

    This post is a thing of beauty. Sort of like Rembrandt in his prime. I'm gonna print this baby out, fame it and hang it on the wall of my office.

  4. If it is their personal decision we must let it to him only .I think civilians must not interfere in this .It all comes to know the lawsuit may serving them to extend its might getting more soothing.

  5. sohbet says:

    telling these little stories, here's a good idea: Have a point. It makes it so much more interesting for the listener.

  6. affaires says:

    I support what AIG director said. A complete review. I really don’t think anyone has put it that way before!.

  7. You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching, Love like you'll never be hurt,Sing like there's nobody listening, And live like it's heaven on earth.

  8. sohbet says:

    officers to investigate Blackstone's fishy financial transactions, but they wound up giving them

  9. sohbet says:

    Very good and interesting site with very good look and perfect information I like it

  10. chat says:

    Very good and interesting site with very good look and perfect information I like it danke

  11. sohbet says:

    Very good and interesting site with very good look and perfect information I like it

  12. turkish islami chat room's!

  13. sohbet says:

    Very good and interesting site with very good look and perfect

  14. Well done, members of Congress! Not like any of you should know anything about the process playing out with AIG's board. Only 2 of the 3 of you who signed that letter are attorneys. Not to mention that all of you vote on federal laws for a living, and therefore maybe should have at least a passing familiarity with corporate law in the state that's the legal home to a plurality of large US corporations.

  15. Thank you so much regarding giving me an update on this subject matter on your web-site. Please realise that if a completely new post appears or in case any improvements occur with the current submission

  16. I would be interested in reading more and knowing how to make good utilization of those methods you share. Thanks for your efforts and consideration of other men and women by making this website available.

  17. Oh my goodness! a fantastic write-up dude. Thank you Nonetheless I’ll be experiencing trouble with ur rss . Do not know why Struggling to sign as much as it. Probably there’s any particular person getting identical rss difficulty? Any individual who knows kindly respond.

  18. Hi there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using? I’m planning to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a tough time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique. P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!

  19. I’m curious to find out what blog platform you have been using? I’m having some minor security issues with my latest blog and I would like to find something more risk-free. Do you have any solutions?

  20. Nice blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your design. Bless you

  21. I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you design this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz answer back as I’m looking to design my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from. thanks a lot

  22. Hello! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I really enjoy reading your blog posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics? Appreciate it!

  23. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your article seem to be running off the screen in Safari. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know.

  24. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Thanks

  25. I do trust all the concepts you have presented in your post. They’re really convincing and can definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are too short for starters. May you please lengthen them a little from next time? Thanks for the post.

  26. I dont know you guys but vmware’s retina support is really giving me pain. When I bought fusion because I trusted vmware rather than parallels but now I see their support is really sucks.

  27. They had 5 months to improve graphics support on fusion but only came out with incremental update to 5.0.3 . I have watched fusion vs. parallels video on youtube and I am seriously thinking to upgrade to parallels.

  28. körü körüne kendi parça bulmak istiyorum.

  29. Very good information and article. Keep up the good work.

  30. I really love the content you have here, it's very educational and useful. I'll definitely come back frequently to learn more.

  31. Dyson DC41 says:

    Hey you got some nice content here. Thanks for showing these great tips!!!

  32. Mold Removal says:

    Thanks – glad I found this as I have been looking for similar info for quite a while. i have bookmarked it for future use.

  33. I really love your content! Thanks

  34. It is always a joy to find such sites with so much useful information, and to hear so many different opinions. I love reading articles of such magnetude. Thank you.

  35. This is some awesome content. Thanks for the share!

  36. Nice Post, it was a good read, thanks!

  37. Großartig sehr interessant.

  38. ACN Scam says:

    Very helpful post. Thank you very much for this.

  39. I really love your content. Thank you :-)

  40. Love you blog, Thanks for the great information

  41. This stuff sure gives me food for thought.
    Thanks

  42. streamlife says:

    Das ist eine geniale neue Marketingidee.
    This is a genius new markeitng idea.

  43. Very good and informative reading. I like this kind of input. I will be back for more later.

  44. This is a wonderful article. thanks for posting it!

  45. Poker Video says:

    Good article. I like it. Thank you.

  46. Good stuff here. I appreciate it.

  47. nail fungus says:

    Thanks for the post – read, enjoyed and bookmarked. Will also be passing it alongto some friends.

  48. Nice site and good content. Glad to be here. Think of sharing Your content. Thank You

  49. Aaron says:

    Interesting. This is a really awesome article. I love it. Thank you so much!

  50. Great Information, Thanks for sharing with us!

  51. Hey great content my friend… I just love your writing style

  52. I really love your content.. Thank you!

  53. So what was all that posturing supposed to achieve? And they get paid how much??????

  54. Thank you for providing such great content.

  55. Hiya, {I am|I'm} really glad {I have|I've} found this {information|info}. {Nowadays|Today} bloggers publish {only|just} about gossip and {internet|net|web} stuff and this is {really|actually} {annoying|irritating|frustrating}. A good {blog|website|web site|site} with {interesting|exciting} content, {this is|{that is|that's}} what I need. {Thanks|Thank you} for making this {website|site|web site|web-site}, and {I will|I'll} be visiting again. Do you do newsletters? I {Cant|Can not|Can't} find it.

  56. Great inside! Thanks for the input.

  57. Great content. Thanks for the information

  58. Great content! I can tell you did your research.

  59. If you looking for a Fargo Realtor or a Fargo Real Estate agent. You might want to check out this video because it will save you time and money instead of finding a Fargo Realtor.

  60. Wake Up Now says:

    Wake Up Now this is good information from a good site. I hope to be able to have a site like this one day

  61. Great content! Thanks for sharing!

  62. Everytime great content.Congratulation.

  63. It is true but there is still a big problems with it.

  64. Excellent blog topic. I definitely appreciate this post and topic. Thanks

  65. I was finding some interesting to read and finally reached here. its good article.

  66. I have read your article and I am excites for another interesting creativity. so update more information on your blog.

  67. while net browsing i found this valuable post. I want to share this on my facebook app.

  68. I am here just due to the writing of my favorite favorite topic. Its nice and clear in topic.

  69. In this area of topic writer covered all aspects that is nice and good in article writng.

  70. Chrissie Mac says:

    Great content. Thanks, will be back.

  71. thyromine says:

    The information is great I enjoyed this article alot.

  72. Excellent blog topic. I definitely appreciate this post and topic. Thanks

  73. Everything is clear and open and mention in very clear wors and phraes.

  74. Does that have any affect your creativity? Your observation to keep confidences. good work.

  75. I think i have right to share honest comment. honestly writer have not the art of writing.

  76. This is a great inspiring post.I am pretty much happy with your good stuff.You put very nice information ..

  77. Its difficult to attract all type of user on single article. but this post have this ability.

  78. Very interesting topic. really informative. of all the articles I have read on the same topic,its good

  79. I love the blog too much and i am sure that its best writing about this topic.

  80. In this area of topic writer covered all aspects that is nice and good in article writng.

  81. well .. i like this post, very useful information. I bookmarked this page and i'll visit this blog again near time. Thanks

  82. But, what about the bottom line? Are you positive concerning the source?

  83. fantastic put up, very informative. I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector do not realize this.

  84. What i do not realize is in truth how you are now not actually much more neatly-favored than you may be right now. You are so intelligent.

  85. Hi my loved one! I want to say that this post is amazing, nice written and come with almost all important infos.

  86. Your writing taste has been amazed me. Thank you, very nice post.

  87. What's Taking place i'm new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads.

  88. You already know therefore significantly on the subject of this matter, produced me personally imagine it from so many various angles.

  89. Thanks, I've just been searching for information approximately this topic for ages and yours is the best I have came upon till now.

  90. Hey I really enjoyed reading your article. how do I find more information on this subject?

  91. ferroli says:

    Benim kuzenim bu blogu tavsiye etmişti. Böyle ayrıntılı bilgiler sunduğunuz için teşekkür ederim. Güzel ve tamamlayıcı bir makale olmuş.
    Bence şu anda burada çok güzel bir yazı paylaştınız. Bu web sitesinin sahibine gerçekten müteşekkirim.Paylaşım için teşekkür ederim
    Enter text right here!