Financial innovation gets kind of a bad rap, and one of my favorite parts of this job is when I get to celebrate it just for being itself. Sometimes this means breathtaking magic like the derivative on its derivatives that Credit Suisse sold to itself, or elegant executions of classic ideas like the Coke shares that SunTrust sold for regulatory purposes but not for tax purposes. Other times it’s a more prosaic combination of already-existing building blocks to allow people who were comfortably doing something to keep comfortably doing it in the face of regulations designed to make it more uncomfortable.

Yesterday a reader pointed me to a Bond Buyer article that, while perhaps neither all that scandalous nor all that beautiful, is sort of cozy. It’s about a new issue of callable commercial paper issued by a Florida municipal financing commission, and here’s the joke:

JPMorgan came up with the new product as a solution for variable-rate municipal issuers facing impending Basel III regulatory problems. The proposed regulations would require banks to have a certain higher value of highly liquid assets to be available to turn into cash to meet liquidity commitments that could be drawn within 30 days. Maintaining higher liquidity would be expensive for banks, which may try to pass on costs to its issuers, according to an analyst at Moody’s Investors Service. “What we did, starting over a year ago, is ask what we can do to change the product that will still work for all the players, including issuers, investors, and the rating agencies,” Lansing said. “And the ultimate result was this product.” The new product allows banks to continue to support variable-rate products after the regulations are implemented. The paper has a variable length of maturity, but always at least 30 days. Several days before the paper would have 30 days left to its maturity, the issuer calls the paper.

The joke isn’t that funny, though I giggled at the phrase “a solution for variable-rate municipal issuers facing impending Basel III regulatory problems.” Municipal issuers face no Basel III problems: municipalities are not subject to Basel III. Their banks face those problems – the problem being that, under Basel III, they have to keep some money lying around in case their municipal clients draw on their commercial-paper liquidity facilities. The new Basel III liquidity coverage ratio rules require banks to hold “high quality liquid assets” sufficient to cover certain assumed liquidity outflows, including draws on commercial paper back-up liquidity facilities. Holding HQLAs is, to a first approximation, expensive. Banks being banks, they tend to pass costs on to customers.

So under Basel III, municipalities have to pay more for backup liquidity, or … do this thing. This thing is, instead of issuing 90-day (say) commercial paper, you issue 120-day commercial paper, and you tell everyone you’ll call it for redemption (i.e. roll it over) in 90 days. If you can’t remarket it in 90 days, you have to pay an extra 0.75% on the notes you’ve left outstanding, though you pay that extra 0.75% not to the CP investors but to the liquidity provider, JPMorgan.1

Investors get 90-day CP. The issuer gets 90-day CP. The bank gets to provide its liquidity facility for 120-day CP, which never has less than 30 days of remaining life. That takes advantage of the way the Basel III LCR rules are written: they are aimed at the risk of short-term outflows, and since liquidity facilities are normally only drawn when CP matures and can’t be rolled, the rules exclude facilities backing CP with a longer-than-30-day remaining life.2 So the bank never has to hold any high-quality liquid assets to back this liquidity facility – unless the CP can’t be remarketed on the call date, in which case the bank is getting an extra 0.75% to defray its costs of holding a bigger liquidity reserve.

Is this deal a major work of art? Not really; step-up call structures – “this [bond/preferred/whatever] has a [30-year/perpetual/whatever] maturity, but if we don’t call it within 5 years we have to pay an extra [__]% annual interest” – are a longstanding way for issuers to tell busybodies (capital regulators, ratings agencies, etc.) that they have a long-dated capital structure, while reassuring investors that they’ll get their money back soon. Extending the idea to get around the Basel III LCR is a moderately clever reuse of a very old tool.

Is it terrible and malicious and financial-system-destroying? I mean, meh? It’s municipal commercial paper? That said, there’s a sort of conservation law to financial risk; the fact that bank and issuer avoid the cost of following Basel III rules here means that that cost is somehow shifted elsewhere, in the form of increased risk. So it’s worth tracing where it goes.

Some of it probably goes to investors – “oh it’s basically a 90-day issue, right?,” they think, and so don’t charge enough for the end-of-days optionality.3 But a lot of it probably goes to the bank. The Basel LCR rules are intended to make you hold a liquidity reserve in good times, as sort of a good starting point for dealing with your liquidity problems when times get bad. You don’t have to hold cash equal to all of your potential outflows; instead, Basel makes certain assumptions about how much money will go out the door, including 30% of your municipal commercial paper liquidity commitments.4

If you have a regular-way program of providing liquidity backstops to a lot of municipal commercial paper, some portion of those backstops will always be due within 30 days, so you’ll always hold some cushion of liquid assets. If things get worse in the muni market and issuers actually draw on their liquidity commitments, that cushion will help, though your ultimate risk is that 100% of those commitments end up getting drawn and sending cash out the door.

If your program looks entirely like this thing, though, in the ordinary course you’ll hold no cushion against potential draws, because none of your backstops will ever be due within 30 days.5 Until they are! Once your issuers stop being able to roll their commercial paper, then you’re ultimately on the hook and all of your backstops end up – albeit with a 30-day delay – looking like regular backstops. Just like the regular-way backstopping bank, you may need to ramp up to funding 100% of your commitments, but you ramp up from a much lower starting point, albeit with a bit more time to do it. The time helps, but the bad fact is that you are hoarding even more liquidity at a time when, presumably, so is everyone else.6

Which is not really a big deal: it’s just a little added cyclicality for a firm – JPMorgan – that more or less knows how to deal with its liquidity risk. It follows the letter of the rules cleverly, though you could argue about whether it’s wholly within their spirit. But it’s hard to get worked up about it: as long as markets stay relatively normal, this product really is a bit less risky than a regular liquidity backstop, so why shouldn’t they hold a bit less liquidity against it? As long as markets stay relatively normal, everything is fine. Isn’t that the point?

Morgan Stanley Joins JPM in Offering New Product [Bond Buyer]
Sunshine State Governmental Financing Commission – Commercial Paper Revenue Notes, Series H

1. Page 6 of the CP Memorandum:

The Issuer will incur a surcharge under the Liquidity Facility (the “Surcharge”) to the extent any Notes are not successfully redeemed prior to maturity, for each day during the period commencing thirty (30) days immediately preceding the date such Notes are scheduled to mature …. To avoid such surcharge, the Issuer anticipates entering into a standing order with each Dealer (the “Standing Order”), subject to certain conditions, to facilitate a redemption on the earliest possible Business Day within each Call Exercise Period.

Page 15 notes that the Surcharge is 0.75% on the notes left outstanding past 30 days before maturity. The Call Exercise Period is the 35 days before maturity. So basically you’ll get redeemed 35 days before maturity, 30 at the latest, if things are normal. Btw the 120-noncall-90 in the text is made up; the latest deal is apparently actually 136-day final maturity, but that sounds weird.

2. Paragraph 128 here:

A liquidity facility is defined as any committed, undrawn back-up facility that would be utilised to refinance the debt obligations of a customer in situations where such a customer is unable to rollover that debt in financial markets (eg pursuant to a commercial paper programme, secured financing transactions, obligations to redeem units, etc). For the purpose of this standard, the amount of the commitment to be treated as a liquidity facility is the amount of the currently outstanding debt issued by the customer (or proportionate share, if a syndicated facility) maturing within a 30 day period that is backstopped by the facility. The portion of a liquidity facility that is backing debt that does not mature within the 30-day window is excluded from the scope of the definition of a facility. Any additional capacity of the facility (ie the remaining commitment) would be treated as a committed credit facility with its associated drawdown rate as specified in paragraph 131. …

Paragraph 131(b) & (c) assumes a 30% drawdown of public-sector liquidity facilities but only a 10% drawdown of credit facilities.

3. I guess? I know nothing about the muni CP market, maybe they do charge enough. Also how bad is that optionality? One thing worth noting is that the bank can terminate the liquidity facility for various mishaps, including insolvency or downgrade of the issuer (page 17). One can easily imagine a sequence of (1) failed remarketing, (2) rating agencies notice and downgrade issuer, (3) JPMorgan terminates liquidity facility, (4) CP comes due and can’t be rolled or put to liquidity provider, (5) CP investors eat loss. In other words this is quite wrong-way optionality, for the investors.

4. See note 2. (Is that cross-referencing obnoxious? Probably, right?)

5. I actually don’t know how to read the “additional capacity … will be treated as a committed credit facility” bit of the Basel rules (note 2 again). Does that mean 30% drawdown for 30-day-and-under, and 10% for 30+ day? Probably. In which case this is a 10% buffer, instead of the 30% buffer for a regular-way facility.

6. Of course the 30 days’ delay is worth something. But even there, note this oddity: when an issue can’t be remarketed and so gets within 30 days of maturity, the bank now needs to hold liquid assets equal to 30% of its commitment. But at this point – with short-term muni markets frozen, at least for this particular issuer – the odds that it will have to fund the full amount of its commitment are much higher than in normal times. But it is subject only to the normal, 30% liquidity coverage requirement.

Comments (74)

  1. Posted by broseph | January 25, 2013 at 12:44 PM

    I think that's when this business starting going downhill…when senior management stopped wearing admiral's hats to work.

  2. Posted by PermaGuestII | January 25, 2013 at 12:00 PM

    Stopped wearing hats, stopped smoking cigars, stopped getting M&A deals done by locking the principals into the dining room of their yacht and sailing around in circles until they agreed to terms…

  3. Posted by Dennis Conner, MS MD | January 25, 2013 at 12:19 PM

    Great, I'll just drive my deferred yacht around in circles with my deferred clients locked inside, we'll be killing the league tables by 2050.

  4. Posted by You Know Where MD | January 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM

    I've got a guy locked in the trunk of an Accord parked on the side of the Merritt, really hoping this works out.

  5. Posted by Deleveraging | January 25, 2013 at 1:40 PM

    At the time eating a salad at the desk while reading Matt's post seemed like a good idea as opposed to bundling up and going around the corner for a couple a quick pops and a sandwich. But why do I now feel like I have a hangover? Well hopefully this was my dumbest move of the day.

  6. Posted by Avid Reader | January 25, 2013 at 1:04 PM

    OK, even **I** find this a little boring, Matt. You didn't have much to work with, of course.

  7. Posted by Guestest | January 25, 2013 at 1:11 PM

    Well, this product just allows the ratios to look better without actually adding any cushion.

    Moving on to the next article

  8. Posted by Guest | January 25, 2013 at 1:11 PM

    So great is the power of linkage and order, that even the mundane becomes important.

    - Horace, via Diderot

  9. Posted by Geezer NGL Trader | January 25, 2013 at 1:26 PM

    "Never piss uphill barefooted."

  10. Posted by agrajag888 | January 28, 2013 at 3:59 PM

    speaking of flawed government reform, why doesn't congress have term limits? I know why they don't want term limits and also why as citizens we should demand them!

    sign this petition and get others to do the same! https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/term-li

  11. Posted by chat | February 20, 2013 at 11:01 PM

    goods blogs thanksasdasd

  12. Posted by sohbet odalari | February 20, 2013 at 11:01 PM

    goods blogs thanksxzc

  13. Posted by cinsel chat | March 11, 2013 at 6:39 PM

    Hatirlandıgın zaman oyısaf yesdf yes soryning n/p

  14. Posted by seks sohbet | March 11, 2013 at 6:39 PM

    Tuzakların arasındasin sen sadace

  15. Posted by sohbet | March 24, 2013 at 2:33 AM

    ortant ways unknowable: you could list what the stuff was, if you had a big enough piece of paper, but it was hard to get a handle on what it wo

  16. Posted by sohbet | April 26, 2013 at 4:12 AM

    on't doubt that he suffered as a kid in that high school yard. And I wonder, if he wasn't bullied then, what he had to do to survive then, and the impact that had and who he has come to be because of it. He is a wounded man, and while I find him odious, I am not unmoved by the sadness and pain of his past that his comments today imply.

  17. Posted by sohbet odalari | April 26, 2013 at 4:12 AM

    asds the impact that had and who he has come to be because of it. He is a wounded man, and while I find him odious, I am not unmoved by the sadness and pain of his past that his comments today imply.

  18. Posted by kafa basketbolu | May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM

    I've got a guy locked in the trunk of an Accord parked on the side of the Merritt, really hoping this works out.

  19. Posted by chat | May 27, 2013 at 3:21 PM

    turkish numberone chat room's!

  20. Posted by sohbet | May 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM

    turkishchat.net

  21. Posted by chat | May 27, 2013 at 3:24 PM

    turkish chat

  22. Posted by Ahli Kompi | June 18, 2013 at 5:22 PM

    I've got a guy locked in the trunk of an Accord parked on the side of the Merritt, really hoping this works out.

  23. Posted by HP Baru | June 18, 2013 at 10:17 PM

    Get the latest financial news, headlines, commentary, and analysis when you subscribe to Dealbreaker.

  24. Posted by Obat kolesterol | June 19, 2013 at 9:51 AM

    Sorry for the huge review, but I'm really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it's the right choice for you.

  25. Posted by sedanten herbal | June 19, 2013 at 9:53 AM

    If you're still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you'll know which is right for you. salut for dealbreaker…

  26. Posted by Obat alami | June 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM

    I'll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  27. Posted by event organizer | June 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM

    heheh nice info

  28. Posted by pembesar penis | June 19, 2013 at 12:10 PM

    wow amazing info brother

  29. Posted by pembesar akat vital | June 19, 2013 at 12:10 PM

    thanks

  30. Posted by vigrx plus original | June 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM

    wow amazing bro

  31. Posted by jasa seo murah | June 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM

    jasa seo murah, please visit web me

  32. Posted by tokohyundai.com | June 19, 2013 at 12:12 PM

    wow this right

  33. Posted by xamthonestore.com | June 19, 2013 at 12:12 PM

    xamthone herbal ini here

  34. Posted by xamthone | June 19, 2013 at 12:13 PM

    xamthone herbal in here

  35. Posted by Puisi persahabatan | June 21, 2013 at 8:53 AM

    hm nice post. i like it.

  36. Posted by Berita Online | June 21, 2013 at 8:54 AM

    keep post guys!

  37. Posted by grosir sprei murah | June 23, 2013 at 4:39 AM

    nice look, the old way give more confident

  38. Posted by jual sprei murah | June 23, 2013 at 4:41 AM

    Get the latest financial news, headlines, commentary, and analysis when you subscribe to Dealbreaker. very recommended

  39. Posted by Download Onepiece | June 23, 2013 at 11:03 AM

    nice post guys

  40. Posted by jual sprei murah | June 25, 2013 at 9:24 AM

    Informative post content you got here Matt. Your blog post is really gathered valuable information sharing. This business info is really knowledgeable. God bless..!!!

  41. Posted by Jumbo loans | July 1, 2013 at 1:45 AM

    ..choose your business carefully, not only based on the amount of money it will take to get off the ground or how many hours you will need to put in every week…

  42. Posted by sohbet | July 8, 2013 at 8:52 PM

    officers to investigate Blackstone's fishy financial transactions, but they wound up giving them

  43. Posted by Click here | July 8, 2013 at 11:07 PM

    I am impressed by the quality of information on this website. There are a lot of good resources here.

  44. Posted by RENTAL MOBIL ELF | July 14, 2013 at 4:52 AM

    I am impressd by thats quality of information on this site
    sewa mobil elf

  45. Posted by pakar seo | July 15, 2013 at 4:06 AM

    why doesn't congress have term limits? I know why they don't want term limits and also why as citizens we should demand them!

  46. Posted by ldii | July 15, 2013 at 4:49 AM

    that is true : I think that's when this business starting going downhill…when senior management stopped wearing admiral's hats to work.

  47. Posted by harga lantai kayu | July 16, 2013 at 1:52 AM

    nice

  48. Posted by Ahli Vitalitas | July 16, 2013 at 10:52 PM

    yaa .. history of success takes hard work.

  49. Posted by Ilmu Pelet Wanita | July 31, 2013 at 9:53 AM

    liquidity of bank must be able for nice mom like here dasar tukang nyepem

  50. Posted by jual kaos bola | August 3, 2013 at 6:31 AM

    banking is never simplier for me :| kaos bola murah

  51. Posted by Hari - hari indah | August 3, 2013 at 8:24 AM

    Banking is always confusing for me… .

  52. Posted by Panduan Komputer | August 5, 2013 at 5:49 AM

    very nice

  53. Posted by TERKINI TERBARU | August 8, 2013 at 8:27 PM

    nice info

  54. Posted by Home Improvement | September 2, 2013 at 2:48 AM

    nice article

  55. Posted by Car Title Loans | September 12, 2013 at 10:33 PM

    you mentioned jp morgan in your article. Have you ever read some of the auto biographies or seen any of the men who built America episodes on television. He was a true banker in every sense of the word and a lot of ruthless bankers should model after him…jk! He made an investment in his money and his people alike. He valued good business partners and was more open minded than some of the people before him like rockefeller etc……..

  56. Posted by jual kaos bola murah | October 3, 2013 at 10:29 PM

    banking easy and simple related article here kaos bola original

  57. Posted by alat bantu sex | October 5, 2013 at 4:13 AM

    great ide and i like ur comment

  58. Posted by Ahman | October 14, 2013 at 11:01 AM

    I've got a guy locked in the trunk of an Accord parked on the side of the Merritt, really hoping this works out. :)

  59. Posted by panduari21 | November 9, 2013 at 12:46 AM

    I think that's when this business starting going downhill…when senior management stopped wearing admiral's hats to work. visite my blog to on Harga Ho Oppo n1 2013

  60. Posted by Umroh Plus Dubai | November 11, 2013 at 1:12 AM

    Thanks for information

  61. Posted by waralaba murah | November 12, 2013 at 3:27 AM

    I
    achievement you get right of entry to consistently fast.

  62. Posted by Panduari | November 16, 2013 at 9:58 PM
  63. Posted by kredit tanpa agunan | November 24, 2013 at 3:18 AM

    he's from swiss right?

  64. Posted by visual basic | December 2, 2013 at 10:55 AM

    thanks a post

  65. Posted by kredit tanpa agunan | December 2, 2013 at 10:56 AM

    good article, thanks

  66. Posted by kta dbs | December 2, 2013 at 10:57 AM

    thanks sharing

  67. Posted by wiraswasta rumahan | December 2, 2013 at 10:57 AM

    basel from swiss, right?

  68. Posted by ilmu pelet gratis | December 22, 2013 at 8:37 PM

    like a sailor photo

  69. Posted by Panduari | December 28, 2013 at 5:15 AM

    Good post bro….informasi harga hp evercross

  70. Posted by Arwana | January 16, 2014 at 12:15 PM

    thanks for sharing_ Klasifikasi Lobster

  71. Posted by Trik Berbagi | February 15, 2014 at 1:12 AM

    Thanks,,,This is good article :)

  72. Posted by pembicara internet | February 18, 2014 at 8:51 PM

    Thank you

  73. Posted by pembicara ukm | February 18, 2014 at 9:45 PM

    Thanks You

  74. Posted by masini jocuri | March 11, 2014 at 3:20 PM

    Hyundai Motor Co wants to begin retailing their very first battery-powered electrical car (EV) in 2016 because South Korea's hero of fuel-cell cars hedges its bets in next-generation eco-friendly technologies. Hyundai has leant toward engines which change hydrogen into electricity in keeping with stricter emission regulations in markets for example the United States. Study and creation partner Kia Motors Corp has accentuated rechargeable electric batteries. But the division of effort is blurring at the same time whenever the amount of battery-powered EVs is increasing. BMW's i3 as well as Nissan Motor Co Ltd's Leaf are commonly likely to get to Korea this coming year – as would probably Kia's Soul EV. "There is not any very clear course concerning which environment-friendly cars will win. We have been isolating tasks of Hyundai and Kia, with Hyundai setting up fuel cell vehicles as well as Kia specializing in electric autos," Senior Vice Managing director Lee Ki-sang notified reporters on Tuesday.