• 22 Jan 2013 at 5:41 PM

Rajat Gupta: My Buddy Raj is a Big, Fat Liar*

All things considered, Rajat Gupta would still prefer not to go to jail.

Rajat Gupta, a former Goldman Sachs board member, has asked a federal appeals court to reverse his conviction on insider trading charges, arguing that a judge made a series of incorrect rulings during his trial.

“This court should reverse the convictions in view of the court’s serious evidentiary errors, which decisively tipped the scales in this case,” wrote Mr. Gupta’s lawyers in its brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Manhattan, which was filed late Friday.

As with the other appeals in this recurring series, the former McKinsey & Co. chief’s lawyers don’t think that the wiretaps used by prosecutors during the trial were kosher, even though every other trial judge who’s presided over an insider-trading case agrees that they are. Raj Rajaratnam, whom Gupta is accused of tipping, has made the same argument before the same court; said court has yet to rule.

On the other hand, Gupta’s lawyers have one weapon at their disposal that Rajaratnam’s don’t: that RajRaj is a lying liar who lied even to his own eventual detriment about having insider information.

On one wiretap – perhaps the most damning piece of evidence presented at trial – Mr. Rajaratnam tells a colleague, “I heard yesterday from somebody who’s on the board of Goldman Sachs that they are going to lose $2 per share.”

Mr. Gupta’s lawyers argued that Mr. Rajaratnam’s statement is the unreliable hearsay testimony “of a known fabulist.”

“Without a proper basis for admission, these untestable, unreliable hearsay statements had no place in a criminal trial, and their admission alone compels reversal,” Mr. Gupta’s lawyers wrote.

Rajat Gupta Seeks Reversal of Insider Trading Conviction [DealBook]
Rajat Gupta seeks insider trading conviction reversal [Reuters]

* At least two of these descriptors is inarguably accurate.

15 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (15)

  1. Posted by Guest | January 22, 2013 at 9:13 PM

    YOU PUT DOWN MY SON'S ASTERISK RIGHT NOW, MISTER, AND APOLOGIZE TO HIM!

    – Matt's mom

  2. Posted by HighFrequencyHater | January 23, 2013 at 2:16 PM

    Well Goldman did actually end up losing ~5 bucks per share, but something tells me the federal circuit doesn't do price is right rules for this kinda stuff.

  3. Posted by shazmyballs | January 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM

    Shaz, get your shit together, you suck.

    -Mom

  4. Posted by chat | February 20, 2013 at 11:11 PM

    goods blogs thankssadasd

  5. Posted by sohbet | February 20, 2013 at 11:11 PM

    goods blogs thanks

  6. Posted by sohbet odalari | February 20, 2013 at 11:11 PM

    goods blogs thankssad

  7. Posted by sohbet | March 24, 2013 at 2:26 AM

    we always do a great job with our layoffs.

  8. Posted by sohbet | April 26, 2013 at 4:48 AM

    sade learned that you put onto this kind of release. Searching to

  9. Posted by sohbet odalari | April 26, 2013 at 4:48 AM

    sdadyour publish. It is well-articulated, razor-sharp, along with goal. What beneficial instruction you may have learned that you put onto this kind of release. Searching to

  10. Posted by klima | April 29, 2013 at 4:41 AM

    That's good news. But kadıköy kombi servisi unfortunately it does not solve my problem:
    When will it be possible to link ANY G+ profile with our channel? I have about 2000 followers on G+ but can't connect it with my YouTube channel as it is two different Google-Accounts.

  11. Posted by pop radyo | April 29, 2013 at 4:41 AM

    So, please make it possible to connect a Google+ Profile with beylikdüzü kombi servisi a YouTube channel, no matter if they are different Accounts. Otherwise it's all useless to me.

  12. Posted by radyo dinle | April 29, 2013 at 4:42 AM

    Another idea: Allow connecting a Google+ profile with more than just one YouTube channel (which helps solving my first problem as well). Thus people who kombi servisleri run more than one channel (for different content/reasons) can have only one Google+ profile and still connect with all their subscribers via Google+ and have HOA and all that good stuff.

  13. Posted by radyo | April 29, 2013 at 4:44 AM

    Any of these ideas would solve my problem and give creators like us more flexibility on how to connect with our subscribers.arçelik klima servisi

    Thanks in advance for listening to us and making things possible.

  14. Posted by popradyo | April 29, 2013 at 4:52 AM

    kombi servisi Am I the only one who imagined Raj busting out of a sequined gown upon reading the word "fabulist"?

  15. Posted by sohbet | July 8, 2013 at 8:57 PM

    officers to investigate Blackstone's fishy financial transactions, but they wound up giving them