• 12 Feb 2013 at 4:54 PM

Prominent Former Bank Still Wheeling and Dealing

Lehman Brothers’ former Manhattan headquarters is now unmistakably the New York base of an even more discredited (if still solvent) bank. But the bankrupt if lucrative shell of a company still owns a big midtown building—one that it took over two years after it filed for bankruptcy. Now, it’s unloading it for a song.

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. has agreed to sell the Manhattan office tower at 237 Park Ave. to a venture of RXR Realty LLC and Walton Street Capital in what would be one of the largest sales in Manhattan in the past year.

The price is more than $800 million, according to multiple real-estate executives with knowledge of the sale, including about $420 million in debt that would be assumed by the new owners….

The deal comes at a time when Manhattan office building values have been increasing. Still 237 Park’s price tag is well off the $1.2 billion price that was paid for the property in 2007, a sign of how frothy the market got during the boom years.

Lehman back then was the financial backer of Broadway Partners, an active buyer in the years leading up to the bust. Broadway paid top dollar for 237 Park betting rents would rise. But instead, rents fell, and Lehman, which held much of the property’s debt, struck a deal in 2011 to take control of the building from Broadway. Last year, Lehman tapped Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. to market the 1.2 million square foot tower.

Lehman in Deal to Sell Park Avenue Property [WSJ]
Lehman to Sell Manhattan Park Avenue Tower to RXR Venture [Bloomberg]

14 comments (hidden to protect delicate sensibilities)
Show all comments ↓

Comments (14)

  1. Posted by Office Space Quant | February 12, 2013 at 5:00 PM

    Pretty sure there were BSC offices in there that are now Stifel.

  2. Posted by juniormistmaker | February 12, 2013 at 5:09 PM

    Don't be ridiculous! Stifel works from home.

  3. Posted by Feeling Dumb | February 12, 2013 at 5:23 PM

    Joke briefer?

  4. Posted by guest | February 12, 2013 at 5:35 PM

    Not that I care about either one of them, but Barclays "more discredited" than Lehman? I think in the annals of financial history, the reckless destruction of a 100+ year old investment bank will look slightly worse than rigging libor.

  5. Posted by HandiCapital | February 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM

    Hu-hu… Annals.

    – Butt-Head

  6. Posted by Nell Diamond | February 12, 2013 at 5:49 PM

    I'm still not going hold your d.

  7. Posted by guest | February 12, 2013 at 7:20 PM

    paying 800m + assuming 420M debt seems close to 1.2bn to me

  8. Posted by Boss | February 12, 2013 at 8:15 PM

    It is shocking that you are literate, because you clearly can't do math (or have no experience in buy-side)
    800 pp with a 420 loan assumed = 380 of equity

  9. Posted by guest | February 13, 2013 at 12:28 AM

    The word "including" was important.

  10. Posted by guest | February 13, 2013 at 2:02 AM

    actually, anyone who reads general interest media (including the good newspapers) coverage of M&A knows that they get the calculation of enterprise value wrong or word it vaguely because they don't understand it at least half the time. i've seen companies issue press releases about their own deals that aren't clear on it.

  11. Posted by DB HR | February 13, 2013 at 10:21 AM

    guest just got hired where?

  12. Posted by Matt | February 13, 2013 at 12:15 PM

    Stop posting as guest Shazar! Man up.

  13. Posted by Dick | February 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM

    Nothing like a Shazar by-line to ruin your week.

  14. Posted by History Major | February 13, 2013 at 3:03 PM

    What building will the Gorilla swing from now?