- 13 Mar 2013 at 12:09 PM
New British Regulators May Not Have Done Any Better Than The FSA, But It Was Totally Worth The Trouble Of Setting Them Up AnywayBy Jon Shazar
As you may have heard, the U.K. is putting the FSA out to pasture at the end of the month. In its place on April 1 will sit the Prudential Regulation Authority—success guaranteed by the name alone—and the Financial Conduct Authority.
Why was this necessary? To quote the man who made it happen, Chancellor George Osborne, “When a system of regulation fails so spectacularly, people are going to ask what replaces it.” This question was not asked of the equally spectacular failures of the Securities and Exchange Commission, but no matter: Neither President Barack Obama nor Congressional Republicans got elected promising to junk the SEC. But the Tories did promise to get rid of the FSA, and so it must go, making it two British governments in a row that have decided to start financial regulators from scratch.
By splitting the duties of the Financial Services Authority, policy makers hope to separate the daily monitoring of banks’ financial health from the policing of illegal activity like insider trading. The goal is to allow the separated regulators to focus on their own areas, instead of trying to cover everything from banks’ capital buffers to market abuse…
“When we look back, last year will be seen as the low point,” said Martin Wheatley, who will take control of the Financial Conduct Authority after six years with the Securities and Futures Commission, the regulator in Hong Kong. “The time is right; we can rebuild from here.”
While the U.S. reacted to the financial crisis with a whole raft of new powers and responsibilities for its regulators, the U.K. chose to simply distribute existing powers. This has not exactly put the fear of God in Britain’s potential wrongdoers.
“Regulators never had a lack of powers — they had an unwillingness to use them,” said Bob Penn, a regulatory partner at the law firm Allen & Overy in London. “Regulators failed, not the regulatory structure.”
Both Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wheatley admit the new regulatory structure may not have stopped the recent failures that have blackened London’s reputation as a financial hub.
- New British Regulators May Not Have Done Any Better Than The FSA, But It Was Totally Worth The Trouble Of Setting Them Up Anyway March 13, 2013
- Opening Bell: 07.28.14 July 28, 2014
- Bear Stearns Exec Who Straddled World Of Wall Street And Magicianry Is No Longer July 25, 2014
- Steve Cohen Attends Party, Dresses Like A 'Schlub': Bloomberg July 28, 2014
- Hedge Fund Manager Thinks World’s Just About Over This Whole Apple Fad July 25, 2014
- Argentina Ready To Solve This Thing If You’ll Just Give It Everything It Wants July 25, 2014
- It’s Not Denny Chin’s Fault He Ruled On A Fake Motion Filed By ‘Bernie Madoff’ July 28, 2014
- Ace Greenberg Once Made Paper Clips Disappear July 25, 2014
- Opening Bell: 07.25.14 July 25, 2014
- Which Bank Is Going To Fall For The ‘If We All Admit It At Once They’ll Go Easy On Us’ Trick? July 25, 2014
- Executive Editor
- Bess Levin
How Can We Help You?
- Send tips to:
- For tech issues email:
- For advertising or events email:
- For research or custom solutions email:
- Dealbreaker is published by Breaking Media.
For a full list of our sites, services and staff visit breakingmedia.com