FigJam
Recent Comments
-
Contact Us
Editorial Staff
- Executive Editor
- Bess Levin
- Editor
- Matt Levine
How Can We Help You?
- Send tips to:
tips@dealbreaker.com - For tech issues email:
web@dealbreaker.com - For advertising or events email:
advertising@breakingmedia.com - For research or custom solutions email:
services@breakingmedia.com
- Dealbreaker is published by Breaking Media.
For a full list of our sites, services and staff visit breakingmedia.com
Markets
-
Most Read
- Bonus Watch '12: UBS Investment Bankers Thought Zero Was The Minimum Bonus? They Thought Wrong 8 comments
- Bonus Watch '12: Barclays 25 comments
- Expert: If You Want To Date A Wall Streeter, You'd Better Learn To Read A 10-K ASAP 105 comments
- Bonus Watch '12: UBS Suggests Senior Staff Get Comfortable 9 comments
- And To The Employee He Saw Wearing A Name Tag, Exchanging Business Cards, And Sipping The Free Bottled Water Like Some Kind Of Common Noob: Your Days Are Numbered 25 comments
Topics
AIG Bank of America Barclays Bear Stearns Ben Bernanke bonuses bonus watch Charlie Gasparino Citi Citigroup CNBC David Einhorn Deutsche Bank Dick Bové FOREX Galleon Group Goldman Sachs hedge fund managers Hedge Funds insider-trading Insider Trading Fest(ivus) 2010 Jamie Dimon John Paulson JPMorgan Ken Lewis Lawsuits Layoffs Lehman Brothers Lloyd Blankfein Made-off MBA v CFA Merrill Lynch Morgan Stanley Obama's Economic Superfriends performance Raj Rajaratnam RBS SAC Capital SEC Steve Cohen taxes Tim Geithner UBS Vikram Pandit Warren Buffett-
I second what @12 said. The journal piece is on their OPINION page; it is not a news item! And where is your outrage about a paper being "manipulative" with respect to the NY Times, a newspaper that regularly disguises its opinion pieces as news articles?
Wondering when the Nobel prizes for Physiology/Medicine, Chemistry, and Physics will become political also....
Carney hits bottom...digs deeper. "Other details will have to be worked out." Ya think???? Little "details" like the constitutionality of it... Unadulterated idiocy, in a season of idiocy.
In actuality, it matters not an iota whether "Wall Street" (and as you define it, "Wall Street" seems confined to your drinking buddies)likes or supports Palin. Since it is doubtful that ANY Republican Presidential candidate could carry New York, the preferences of a few thousand Manhattanites is of no real consequence in the general election in determining where the NY electoral votes will go.