IA
Recent Comments
-
Contact Us
Editorial Staff
- Executive Editor
- Bess Levin
- Editor
- Matt Levine
How Can We Help You?
- Send tips to:
tips@dealbreaker.com - For tech issues email:
web@dealbreaker.com - For advertising or events email:
advertising@breakingmedia.com - For research or custom solutions email:
services@breakingmedia.com
- Dealbreaker is published by Breaking Media.
For a full list of our sites, services and staff visit breakingmedia.com
Markets
-
Most Read
- Bonus Watch '12: UBS Investment Bankers Thought Zero Was The Minimum Bonus? They Thought Wrong 8 comments
- Bonus Watch '12: UBS Suggests Senior Staff Get Comfortable 9 comments
- Expert: If You Want To Date A Wall Streeter, You'd Better Learn To Read A 10-K ASAP 103 comments
- Opening Bell: 02.09.12 36 comments
- And To The Employee He Saw Wearing A Name Tag, Exchanging Business Cards, And Sipping The Free Bottled Water Like Some Kind Of Common Noob: Your Days Are Numbered 23 comments
Topics
AIG Bank of America Barclays Bear Stearns Ben Bernanke bonuses bonus watch Charlie Gasparino Citi Citigroup CNBC David Einhorn Deutsche Bank Dick Bové FOREX Galleon Group Goldman Sachs hedge fund managers Hedge Funds insider-trading Insider Trading Fest(ivus) 2010 Jamie Dimon John Paulson JPMorgan Ken Lewis Lawsuits Layoffs Lehman Brothers Lloyd Blankfein Made-off MBA v CFA Merrill Lynch Morgan Stanley Obama's Economic Superfriends performance Raj Rajaratnam RBS SAC Capital SEC Steve Cohen taxes Tim Geithner UBS Vikram Pandit Warren Buffett-
What was up with the production values in that video? It looked like an over-stylized episode of Unsolved Mysteries or something.
7. Timothy Sykes
The SEC complaint states that Stanford had exposure to Madoff. They defrauded investors only to lose some of the defrauded funds to a Ponzi scheme? *slaps forehead*
@4 Nice!
@30 The '90s called. They want their tired and lazy joke structure back.
@10 - This is definitely the work of a flamer
@2: idiot
Isn't that the fund that invests in adult diapers and in JO&C paraphernalia?
Nov. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Clarium Capital Management LLC, the hedge-fund firm run by PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, slumped 18 percent in October, its biggest monthly decline, because of losses on bonds. The firm's Clarium LP fund reported a year-to-date loss of about 3 percent, wiping out the 58 percent gain it made in the first half, according to estimates given to investors.
Gas prices? Seriously? You mean the gas prices that have fallen $1/gallon in just the past month?
I love all of Lewis' books, but his bloomberg columns are absolutely insufferable.
Rumor is that Mack funded the Canolis by selling a 20% equity stake because the pastry store wouldn't face MS as a credit counterparty.
@60 - Walmart is going to put up awesome numbers . Did you take Econ 1? Walmart sells inferior goods. We're in a recession. You do the math. And in case you didn't take Econ 1, let's just say WMT is up 25% YTD (vs. -22% YTD for the S&P) and leave it at that.
It's sort of nonsensical to even quote a level for U.S. CDS, because if the U.S. defaults, the global financial system is pretty much done anyway. It's like writing someone insurance on a massive meteor strike - who is going to be around to collect on the policy?
That was a test. If you know exactly how many men are in the show's title, you fail like #1 did.
That's pretty much the definition of a negative-convexity investment, no? When times are bad, you stop getting cash out of the trade as the PIK begins to toggle. When times are good the sponsor makes a 40% IRR and you get your modest fixed income return.
It's not a good sign when Muffie's author bio is longer than the actual post. I miss Carney.
Has anyone from SNL remained funny past the age of 45, aside from Bill Murray?
I had this offered to me at Morgan Stanley as an analyst two years ago, so I don't think this is anything groundbreaking. It does make you think about whether it's wise for an institution to have assets whose quality is linked to the continuing employment of their own employees. Presumably there's a big slug of correlation there - the moment the bank goes down and the employees start losing their jobs, the mortgages are going to be worthless, thereby hitting the asset side of the balance sheet, thereby causing more employees to be let go, etc. I assume that there are few enough of these Citi mortgages that it's not that big of a deal, though.
Notice how EP avoided the central question. This is my favorite comment thread ever - it almost makes up for the tranny picture yesterday.