maymardgkeynes
Recent Comments
-
Contact Us
Editorial Staff
- Executive Editor
- Bess Levin
- Editor
- Matt Levine
How Can We Help You?
- Send tips to:
tips@dealbreaker.com - For tech issues email:
web@dealbreaker.com - For advertising or events email:
advertising@breakingmedia.com - For research or custom solutions email:
services@breakingmedia.com
- Dealbreaker is published by Breaking Media.
For a full list of our sites, services and staff visit breakingmedia.com
Markets
-
Topics
AIG Bank of America Barclays Bear Stearns Ben Bernanke bonuses bonus watch Charlie Gasparino Citi Citigroup CNBC David Einhorn Deutsche Bank Dick Bové FOREX Galleon Group Goldman Sachs hedge fund managers Hedge Funds insider-trading Insider Trading Fest(ivus) 2010 Jamie Dimon John Paulson JPMorgan Ken Lewis Lawsuits Layoffs Lehman Brothers Lloyd Blankfein Made-off MBA v CFA Merrill Lynch Morgan Stanley Obama's Economic Superfriends performance Raj Rajaratnam RBS SAC Capital SEC Steve Cohen taxes Tim Geithner UBS Vikram Pandit Warren Buffett-
The Rescue Hound That Didnt Bark
"The promise to maintain a positive net worth at the companies means that they will be able to maintain debt payments, and so it amounts to a back door promise on the debt." Not quite. While it is true that it means that the the GSEs will be able to maintain debt payments, under American law the ability to make payments in no way creates a legally enforceable right to demand payment. It just doesn't. Thus, this is most decidedly not a promise, backdoor or otherwise, to back the GSE debt with full faith and credit. Paulson's dissimulation might be enough to make Bill Gross smile (see Bloomberg), but it won't fool the Chinese or the Russians for an instant. I have to ask, what were these people at Treasury thinking? This does nothing.