John Mack, like the Tom Arnold of investment banking (take a second on that one), has overcome huge odds to fight his way back to the top of his game.** Last year, the Morgan Stanley chief, who was shown the door in 2001, received a raise of 38% to take home $41.4 million, reports CNN Money. The package was comprised of a base salary of $800,000, $36.2 million in restricted stock, $4 million in other stock options, miscellaneous compensation of $15,447, $67,963 in pension benefits, $6,100 in matching 401(k) money and, perhaps most importantly, in the parlance of our times, use of the company jet valued at $321,848.
Earlier: How Goldman’s Managed To Stay Out Of The Backdating Scandal
Morgan’s Mack sees hefty pay raise [CNN Money]
**Rocky seemed too easy and we thought it was about time we—Carney—went public with our feelings for Carpool.
Compensation
- Posted in:
CEO
Morgan Stanley Considers Goldman Sachsian Approach To Compensation (Follically-Speaking)
By Bess Levin
Is it too early to start talking about bonuses for 2007? Bear Stearns doesn’t think so. It has already set up a bonus pool for its top executives, according to a recent SEC filing.
From Reuters:
A maximum bonus pool of $165 million has been established for a group of five senior executives that includes Bear Stearns Chief Executive James Cayne, the company said. Payout will be pegged to the company’s return on equity. No executive can get more than 30 percent of the total pool, which can be as little as zero.
Bear Stearns’ compensation committee also approved the performance goals for a second bonus pool for seven other top executives. The maximum amount will be $140 million, with awards based on pretax return on equity, departmental income and expense controls.
These numbers include cash and non-cash bonuses. So if you do the math, the maximum bonus for, say, James Cayne for 2007 will be $49.5 million, or about $3 million dollars less than the co-presidents of Goldman Sachs got for last year.
We can’t help thinking that this suggests a new recruiting slogan for Bear Stearns: “Bear Stearns: It’s like working for Goldman in 2005. Wall Street The Old Fashioned Way.”
Bear Stearns Companies Inc 8-K [SEC]
Bear Stearns sets up $305 mln executive bonus pool [Reuters]
Yesterday we told you that the reason for the Dubya’s visit to Wall Street was two-fold: to create the illusion that he’s done something besides screw up in Iraq and post admirable poll ratings, and to inconvenience those of you in need of caffeine. Apparently there was another reason he hopped on the Acela from Washington Wednesday morning: to shame business leaders for shirking their responsibilities to dole out appropriate salaries and bonuses to C.E.O.s. Though there was no heckling (except from Nardelli, but he always heckles), Bushie’s instructions to “pay attention to the executive compensation packages that you approve” and to make salaries and bonuses commensurate with the “C.E.O.s…success at improving their companies and bringing value to their shareholders” was reportedly met with “silence.” (A point of contention: was the lack of laughter due to bitterness at the idea that the president might be leaving them penniless, or shock over having a guy who’s not yet mastered the riding of a bike or the swallowing of a pretzel, let alone the running of a country, give a lecture on earning one’s keep?) Though he took a shot at the Dems’ plans for legislation that would require shareholder votes on pay packages (saying he didn’t think the government should get involved), he made sure to praise the Securities and Exchange Commission, commenting, “I appreciate the fact that S.E.C. has issued new rules to ensure that there is transparency when it comes to executive pay packages…the print ought to be big and understandable.” Like, you know, the font size and reading level they might use in the Hardy Boys series, or maybe even them See Spot Run books.
Why Did Bush Step Into C.E.O. Pay Debate? [NYT]

We think Ben Stein did but we’ve got water in our ears from this morning’s dip in the pool so it’s hard to say for sure. Anyway, for those who did inquire, Andrew Ross Sorkin and Co. have the answer: go private. Apparently that was the consensus in Switzerland this past week. According to the attendees of a symposium that included people who sound like bigwigs (Pagliuca of Bain Capital, Weinberg of Perella Weinberg, Rosen of Lazard) in Davos on Thursday, private equity will “account for 26 percent or more of the M&A market in five years,” on the heels of this past year’s 20% of M&A’s being represented by private equity. Why?
The ability to pay enormous pay-for-performance packages without an outcry from public shareholders.
According to one pseudonymously named “Buyout King”:
“If one of my C.E.O.’s made $100 million, I’d say that’s great because it means that we probably just made $2 billion.”
What is unacceptable for a public chief executive becomes a powerful incentive in the private sphere.
So there you have it: go private, and shut Ben Stein up.
(There are naysayers, of course, John Thain chiefly among them, who claims “all these ‘going privates’ will soon be ‘going public’ again.” But his word has been, shall we say, fishy, of late).
A Growing Aversion to Ticker Symbols [NYT]
- Posted in:
Compensation
Ben Stein: How Can I Stay Rich If You Guys Keep Lying? Also, If We Could Not Touch On The Fact That I Worked For Nixon This Whole Thing Will This Go A Lot Smoother For All Of Us.
By Bess Levin
Ben Stein had a nice little article on Sunday in which he recounts hearing a Jefferson Starship song on the radio, feels compelled to “put on [his] swim trucks” (a visual we could’ve dealt without but appreciated nonetheless), goes for a dip in his “superheated pool” and “looks up at the stars.” While splashing around in the water he starts to think about his life—his “wonderful” wife, his son who’s the “handsomest son on the planet,” his “glorious” homes, his “great, super” parents, his kick-ass game show, his starring roles in the Visine Clear Eyes commercials, those recurring spots on Charles in Charge, etc, etc. All of the gleaming (egomaniacal, probably exaggerated) superlatives, he credits to capitalism. It was because of capitalism that his parents, Eastern European Jews (represent!), could make money “as individuals according to contract,” not “according to the statues of [their] birth.” The senior Steins’ accumulation of wealth then set the ball in motion for junior Stein to go to law school, get rich, marry what sounds like a pretty hot wife, and afford the cost of an equally attractive sperm donor from which the “handsomest son on the planet” sprang forth, buy the huge house with the “superheated pool” and so on and so forth.
But the more laps he swims, the more Stein starts to get angry– really angry (and not just because the water temperature has dipped to an uncivilized 72°). So angry that he starts to talk about “yeoman farmers” and “hammers” and “granite foundations” (though we’re pretty sure that can be chalked up to the drugs). Capitalism, Stein posits to the handful of people who recognize him outside of “Bueller, Bueller,” can only thrive in the presence of trust. When there’s no trust, there’s no capitalism, and when there’s no capitalism, there’s no “superheated pools” or hot wives or handsome sons or recurring spots on Charles in Charge. All there is are lukewarm pools and mildly attractive but nothing to write home about wives and so-so looking sons and blink-and-you-miss-it bits on, we don’t know, Moesha. And you know who’s to blame for this lack of trust? Stein does:
When I see what the top dogs at all too many corporations are now doing to that trust, I feel queasy. Outrageous—yes, obscene—pay.
You know who should also be held accountable? Washington. They’re all “crooks” there, too. No, if we don’t crack down on thieves like Jobs and, you know, liberals, and fast, you know what’s going to happen? Stein’s going to lose money, he’s going to have to downsize to an aboveground pool; and in order to keep his wife in the lifestyle she’s become accustomed to, he’s going to actually have to take those walk-ons on Moesha.
Greedy backdating of stock options, which in my opinion is straight-up theft. Mangers buying assets from their trustors, the stockholders, at pennies on the dollar, then forestalling competing bids with lockups and insane break up fees.
You see? Already preparing for the worst.
(We’re not saying we agree or disagree with Stein’s anger over corporate greed, thievery, etc, etc—taking actual stances on issues always comes back to bite us in the ass. But maybe next time he should orate from a place other than his “superheated pool”—his gold plated double-wide shower, perhaps?—if he wants people to “feel [his] pain.” Otherwise, it just sounds like BS, BS. Not that there’s anything wrong with that).
The Hard Rain That’s Falling on Capitalism [NYT]
We just had lunch with a relatively senior Goldman guy. Not managing committee but possibly heading in that direction. The word from him was that dozens of senior Goldman people would be getting enormous bonuses this year, but that traders were definitely “over-represented” in this class. He said this wasn’t surprising anyone. Goldman’s trading operations were also “over-represented” when it came to profitability this year. But there was still expected to be grumbling by those who fear that the Lloyd Blankfein–the new head of Goldman who came up through the firm’s trading side–leadership team was biased in favor of the traders and against the investment bankers.
Don’t forget to send bonus rumors to tips@dealbreaker.com. Thanks.
Every now and then when you get too enthusiastic about the ability of activist hedge funds and private equity to reign in abusive C-levels, it’s good to remember stories like this. Sometimes even the smart money gets taken to the cleaners.
The chief executive installed by agitating hedge funds to run BKF Capital Group was among the senior executives to get a fat severance package to walk away from the carnage at the once high-profile New York money manager.
BKF, which was de-listed from the New York Stock Exchange Nov. 1, recently announced that its financial condition was so grave that the chief executive and financial officers agreed “to voluntarily resign” to “conserve cash.” The Rockefeller Center-based firm filed papers with the SEC that shows there’s plenty of cash left for generous exit packages.
Departing CEO John Siciliano – hired with fanfare in the summer of 2005 – is getting a $950,000 severance payment. Better still, he will receive $300,000 for as yet unspecified “certain consulting services.”
CFO J. Clarke Gray will also get a $400,000 cash severance and collect a $183,000 yearend bonus for 2006.
CKF Chutzpah [New York Post]
