Layoffs

While most of the big business news organizations have relentlessly focussed on the pay and pain at the top of Wall Street firms, at DealBreaker we’re intensely working to bring you the latest news throughout the ranks. From senior managing directors to analysts, we’re constantly reporting tips about bonuses, layoffs and where the jobs are. (Send whatever you are hearing to tips@dealbreaker.com. Thanks!)
This morning the New York Sun has a report on what has now become the bonus waiting game. At this stage, almost anyone who hasn’t been laid off is attempting to hold out for the year-end bonus before they hit the job-seeking trail. Layoffs are expected the continue in the first quarter of next year, however, so that might be a tough time to land a plumb spot. To make matters worse, you’ll also be competing with everyone else who also played the take-the-bonus-and-run strategy.
That’s the news that bruises. Now here’s the news you can use. According to the New York Sun, it’s not bad all around. Private equity firms still have lots of money sitting around waiting to put into action, and three areas look hot: special situations (that’s purchasing non-public assets like Japanese golf clubs, Texas steel mils, and other unusual investment opportunities), distressed debt and turnarounds.
The Sun reports:

“When new management comes in, the CEO takes a fresh look, new alliances are formed, and the people who are the closest advisers and allies of the former executive no longer hold that position. As the favored status changes, it ripples down through the organization,” the chief executive at Challenger, Gray & Christmas, John Challenger, said. Right now, “there is a lot of resume paper on the street — people have happy feet,” he said, adding that he is seeing triple the number of resumes on his desk than at this time last year.
But as nerves shake among employees at the city’s big banks, there may be a silver lining. Some areas, particularly distressed debt, turnarounds, and special situations, are actually hiring.
“There is so much money sloshing around in private equity, that the money has to flow somewhere, and it is most likely flowing into distressed debt and special situations,” Mr. Goldstein said. “We have received calls from some banks looking to selectively hire in areas where they are not currently strong but think there are opportunities.”

Scramble Hits Wall Street [New York Sun]

Speaking of Jimmy Cayne, he’s just announced layoffs of about 300 people. That’s about 1.9% of the firm.
Dow Jones newswire quotes from a memo titled “workforce reduction” that bears (heh) Cayne’s imprimatur. According to DJ, the cuts will come “in various business units at all levels of the organization.” Their will also be an attempt to throw more resources into areas where growth opportunities are greatest reduce them in areas that “can no longer justify their current level of infrastructure.”
These three hundred come on top the 550 layoffs from its two mortgage-origination units, as well as the asset management executives who were let go following the collapse of two Bear hedge funds.
“Does this mean Matt Cooper will call for Cayne to be fired again today?” we were asked by the words appearing on our screen as we typed this.
Also, we can’t help but wonder if the number of layoffs was in anyway related to this.
Bear Stearns Lays Off 300 Employees Firmwide [DJ Newswire at CNNMoney.com]

Earlier this afternoon we asked if some of the guys at Bear Stearns might be smiling in the darker parts of their souls at the troubles—losses, snakepits, messes, ousting, disorganized succession plans—Merrill Lynch has been going through lately. Or, more likely, some of the guys who used to be at Bear Stearns, like former head of trading, equities, fixed income, energy and asset management Warren Spector.
We thought that maybe the guys who saw first their hedge funds and then their jobs go down the drain after a Merrill led rush of creditors started grabbing their assets—which, for all anyone knows now, might have turned out of have been worthless anyway—might be experiencing some joy at watching credit market losses take down some of the folks who took them down.
This afternoon Portfolio’s politics guy asks the same question but for a totally different reason. “If Stan O’Neal is out at Merrill, doesn’t that offer some comfort to the likes of Warren Spector,” writes Matthew Cooper. “Merrill is a case of the guy at the top taking the fall. At Bear, it seemed like the number 3, Warren Spector, took the hit instead of James Cayne. Where’s the fairness in that?”
We’re not sure that why exactly anyone would comforted by this. But whatever. Maybe that’s why we’re not writing about politics. But we’re not convinced that Cooper is right when he says that the “guy at the top ought to take the fall when things go so wrong.”
It’s not the first time he’s said it. Back in August Cooper wrote: “It’s hard to see why the firm’s chief executive, James Cayne, would summarily execute Spector but not take the rap himself. The Buck Stops Here, not there.” But we weren’t convinced that time either.
Cooper’s model is clearly a political one—although we can’t remember when the last time a top guy resigned after being disgraced by the activities of his underlings either. Well, we’ve heard about Nixon but that was a long, long time ago! And Nixon is not usually held up as a model of American leadership. So let’s say Cooper’s is a model an idealistic one that is rarely realized in reality.
It’s hard not to suspect that Cooper is trying for some sort of hobgoblinistic, liberal consistency. Liberals think Bush should step down or get impeached because of the activities of, say, Alberto Gonzalez. So that means everyone should step down when their underlings allegedly lead things off the rails.
But should Cayne go? The market, the business media and the rank-and-file if Bear is hardly clamoring for his ouster. There have been losses at Bear Stearns—and investors in those two ridiculously named funds lost buckets and buckets of money—but not on the scale of Merrill Lynch’s. And, perhaps more importantly, Cayne has left investors and employees with a feeling that he understands what went wrong and is acting to contain the damage. O’Neal failed this damage-control test, in part because he had made enough enemies who went for the kill when they scented blood. And that failure, more than anything else, appears to be what doomed him
That may not be ‘fair’ in some cosmic sense. But Wall Street is hardly a place to be if you want cosmic justice.
James Cayne v. Stan O’Neal [Capital blog, Portfolio]

Following an 80 percent drop in third quarter investment banking profits, Wachovia Bank has asked about 200 workers from its corporate and investment banking units in Charlotte, North Carolina and New York to stop coming in to the office. Apparently the severance package for first year analysts is 85K. Will 93-percent-decline-in-profits-from-investment banking-and-sure-to-be-letting-at-least-one-million-employees-go Bank of America do better? We’ll let you know (or you’ll let us know. Either way, information will be transmitted.)
Wachovia starts investment bank job cuts [Reuters]

More Layoffs At JP Morgan

layoffsatbearstearns.jpgThe “worst year ever” for layoffs in finance just got a little bit worse. This morning JP Morgan cut a number of bankers in its loan structuring group, according to a source at the bank. The cuts are said to have hit “expensive people” hardest: three out of four vice-presidents are said to be gone and at least two associates were let go. The most junior employees, the analysts, have “not yet” been let go.
Although the number of jobs lost is not high in absolute terms, they amount to between ten and twenty percent of the large loan structuring group, the source says. This would put the number at the high end of JP Morgan’s claim that it planned to cut “less than 10 percent” of its fixed-income division .
There have also been cuts in the commercial mortgage backed securities conduit origination group and the underwriting group, the source reports. As with many of the recent cuts on Wall Street, these have hit in operations closely connected to the weakest areas of the debt market.
JP Morgan could not immediately be reached for comment on the layoffs.

  • 22 Oct 2007 at 9:11 AM
  • Layoffs

The Year Of The Wall Street Layoff

layoffsatbearstearns.jpgWe write quite a bit around here about job cuts—mostly real although sometimes simply rumored or feared—on Wall Street. But one thing that can get lost in the news about the little cuts—a fixed income trading desk here, a mortgage unit there—is the total amount of blood-letting. How many jobs have New York based financial firms cut this year, anyway?
We got our answer this morning from a real estate news story buried deep inside the New York Times this morning. Well, maybe it wasn’t buried that deep. It was on the front page of the Metro Section but, to be frank, we don’t really read the Metro section very often.
We found ourselves dirtying our fingers this morning with Metro because we were wondering whether this talk of a cab strike would interfere with our plans to attend a party thrown by our friends in the sports ticket futures business. But what got our attention was a long story on how the slow down on Wall Street might impact New York’s economy. And there it was in black and white and smudgy grey.
“All told, financial services firms based in New York have announced job cuts of 42,404 this year,” Times reporter Patrick McGeehan writes, citing the job-placement consultants Challenger, Gray & Christmas. “More than half came in one reorganization at Citigroup, whose employees are scattered around the world, but most of the others have been in and around New York.”
We did some math in the margins of our copy of the paper on the ride into the DealBreaker bunker. Let’s say there are around 190,000 employed by Wall Street firms. (That’s a rough estimate, to be sure. Broader measures of “financial firms” counts as many as three times that number.) Eliminate about 21,000 cuts for Citigroup and we’re left with 21,000 more. Half of those is 10,500. Add back another 5,000 cuts for Citigroup in New York, and we’re up to 15,500. That leaves us with about 8% of Wall Street’s workforce having been cut. Okay, we realize that we’re kind of doing SIV-style math here–guessing about guesses, and then putting a firm number on it–but this should give you some idea of how deep the cuts have gone somewhere.
Not to be too negative—although we’re wearing a black shirt and taking our coffee black on this Monday morning—but this is just the beginning.
With Wall Street Slowing, Uncertainty Descends [New York Times]

Laid-off second year analysts at Morgan Stanley are said to be receiving sixth months of salary severance, which seems pretty nice, though not as nice as an actual job. No pro-rated bonuses, because apparently they received their first ones in August. Anyone know what the non-minion packages from Morgan look like, or what the other banks are giving out? The stingy bastards at Credit Suisse are rumored to be offering vouchers to Shake Shack, but they’re only good for the next week, and for only $3.50, which doesn’t even cover the cost of a Shackburger. Maybe JP Morgan and Bear Stearns are being more generous.