Lehman

The $13.25 billion acquisition of Electronic Data Systems by Hewlett-Packard—the ninth largest tech deal ever, according to DealLogic—has moved the M&A league table standings, DealJournal Heidi Moore reports. Before the deal was announced, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley led this year’s ranking from advising technology companies on mergers. But neither bank has a role in the H-P deal, pushing them down in the rankings
“Goldman ranked first with $14 billion of announced deals to its credit this year, and Morgan Stanley ranked second with $11 billion according to investment-banking research provider Dealogic,” Moore writes. “But now, Goldman is in third place, displaced by Lehman Brothers and J.P. Morgan. Lehman has jumped from fifth to first place with $17 billion of deals to its credit, while J.P. Morgan — which, just yesterday, languished in seventh place with only about $2.2 billion of tech deals to its credit — has vaulted to second place in the rankings from seventh place. Morgan Stanley has fallen to No. 5.”
Citigroup and Evercore Partners advised Electronic Data on the deal. J.P. Morgan Chase and Lehman Brothers advised Hewlett-Packard.
Hewlett-Packard: The Advisers [Deal Journal]

The action in Lehman Brothers is more evidence about how unsteady markets are these days. Shares of Lehman Brothers fell nearly 10 percent early this morning. The rumor spread that the bank would make an announcement this morning, and many assumed (or encouraged others to assume) that it was going to announce more write-downs. This sparked rumors that Lehman Brothers could see a Bear Stearns-style run on the bank, with customers and counterparties bailing out. Options traders started snapping up puts, and shortly afterward the shares plunged.
“Much like the bets in the options market that predicted Bear’s demise (please refer to my prior posts that pointed these out before the institution’s near collapse), traders are betting that Lehman may be facing the same situation soon, in the next 22 days,” the Mock the Market blog explains. “Nearly every out of the money put has traded furiously today, with a particular emphasis on the ap 20′s, which have changed hands nearly 10,000 times today with several hours remaining in the trading day.”
Lehman spokeswoman called the rumors “totally unfounded” and even blamed short sellers for spreading rumors. The market seems to have bought this line, pushing the stock back from its lows. Some are skeptical, however, noting that Bear Stearns made similar noises even as it plunged toward bankruptcy. Companies love blaming shorts and claiming that they are pushing down stock with rumors, but there’s seldom any hard evidence of this. The media allows companies to get away with these claims without ever demanding that they substantiate the claim. Lehman’s no exception.
“There are a lot of rumors in the marketplace that are totally unfounded. We are suspicious that the rumors are being promulgated by short sellers of our stock that have an economic self interest,” Kerrie Cohen, a spokeswoman for Lehman Brothers, said.
We know that the rumors weren’t completely unfounded. Lehman did issue a press release today. Only it wasn’t about losses. Instead Lehman announced that Mark Bourgeois had been hired as the new co-head of global institutional distribution. (That’s an awesome banker name, by the way. Bourgeois.)

  • 17 Mar 2008 at 3:36 PM
  • Lehman

The Lehmanites Strike Back!

Our item on Lehman has provoked sadness and not a little outrage by some of our readers who are both Lehman employees and investors. We’re accused of simply buying into the rumor fueled fire that is burning down Lehman brother’s share price today. In fact, at least one person familiar with the firm suspects a conspiracy behind the fall of Lehman’s shares today.
“Of course, LEH is again tanking today, and the most ominous rumor I’ve heard has to do with Goldman trying to break us while they have the chance (like they did to Bear),” one Lehman investor said on the condition of anonymity. “The resulting fire-sale would be an even higher quality corporate liquidation bargain than Bear Stearns’ portfolio, which was legitimately stinking up the joint. I can see how that would greatly benefit the big firms, even if it is vile.”
He adds that Lehman should have plenty of money so long as counterparties and investors don’t panic.
“The Fed says we have $200 billion of credit if we need it (with the ability to pledge the ‘worthless’ securities as collateral if we’d like). Fuld is absolutely right, liquidity should be off the table,” he says. “But even if we can let everyone cash out successfully, we still need customers! Short of publishing the firm’s complete balance sheet, how could any company manage the market’s insistence on jumping a perfectly sound and well-sailing ship?”

  • 21 Feb 2008 at 2:35 PM
  • Layoffs

Layoffs Watch ’08: Fratricide

crocs.jpgIs Lehman Brothers cutting ten percent of its workforce investment banking staff, circa now? Could be. Also could not be, but we’re leaning more toward “could be” since firing people is de rigueur among the financial set at the moment. Sad, but at least shares of CROX are down 4.12%. Anyway, let us know what you hear.

  • 13 Dec 2007 at 12:36 PM
  • Lehman

Lehman Level 3 Assets Climb

So if your Level 3 assets climb from 12% to 13% of your total assets, is that a good thing or a bad thing? Does that mean they are worth more or that you have more of assets that everyone suspects are probably worth less than you say they are? Does anyone understand what’s going on at Lehman?
To be frank, we certainly do not.

  • 28 Nov 2007 at 1:52 PM
  • Banks

So Uncool

We at my apartment (so me and Marissa) have heard that the invasion of employee privacy by Wall Street firms has taken a bold step forward: hacking into employee Facebook accounts. According to a sometimes reliable, sometimes not source, the human relations department at a certain investment bank has been using creative technology to get into the profiles of current (and prospective) minions, to monitor their off (and on) the clock activities. This is bull shit and I’ll tell you why: it would be one thing, if you and those with the power to get you fired willingly entered into a Facebook friendship, thereby granting them full-access to see what’s a-poppin’ in your personal life whenever they pleased. But this means that someone who doesn’t even have the bedside manner to ask “You wanna do this” first, or worse, someone whose online friendship you’ve formally said no thanks to, can see that you’ve added “Boiler Room” to your favorite movies (sheep) and changed your status from “Billy is working at Bear Stearns” to “Billy is getting a public citation for having relieved himself on the sidewalk in front of Bear Stearns which he wouldn’t have had to do in the first place if those FUCKS hadn’t fired him.” Anyway, try and guess which firm we’re talking about via Facebook message (thereby granting me access to see your profile for one week even if we’re not friends) and I will respond shortly.

dickfuld.jpgJust how has referring to competitors as enemies whose “throats” must be “ripped out,” telling employees to act as though they are “at war,” and, on at least one occasion, making a visit to the trading floor to put his second-best earner’s tie through a shredder, in front of everyone, to make the point that “second best isn’t good enough” helped Dick Fuld to avoid the gigantic writedowns that have plagued Merrill, Citigroup and UBS, the hedge fund failures that have made a joke of Bear Stearns, and the accounting scandal that was Goldman third quarter earnings? How about because all of that is enough to scare the shit out of anyone, especially the people within arm’s length of the guy, into not fucking things up? Nobody wants to be the guy to tell “Gorilla” that things didn’t go so well this quarter, and while everyone else was having a pissing contest to see who could do the worst, Lehman’s minions were being intimidated into not having as horrible a Q3 as their “enemies,” if not necessarily an amazing one (earnings fell 3 percent, to $887 million, and there was a $700 million write-off). Even Mike Mayo, who’s intimidated by no one, gave the credit to Fuld, saying that the outcome was “helped by having one of the most consistent cultures on the Street—one C.E.O. for over a decade, a one-firm mentality and comprehensive risk management,” probably out of fear. Former colleague Stephen Schwarzman, who seems like the kind of guy who would be too petty to give someone else credit for anything, went out of his comfort zone to call Fuld “a survivor” and opine that “he’s got a sixth sense of when things are turning on you,” though, admittedly, Schwarzman’s praise-inducing intimidation could stem more from the height differential than anything else.
But a New York Times profile suggests that Fuld is losing his taste for human flesh, which could mean disaster for LEH. Examine the facts:
- When asked how he felt about “the war comment” from last year, Fuld shifted in his chair and said, “I don’t like the war comment…‘war’ connotes that we are trying to kill our enemies. That’s not the view that I want them to have.”
- After feigning offense at the accusation that he’s “mellowed,” Fuld “paused to collect his thoughts.”
- Then he said: “I think I have many of the same reactions; I just handle them differently…I’VE LEARNED, IN ALL FAIRNESS THERE IS ANOTHER VIEW.”
And the most egregious ?
- Lehman’s president, Joseph M. Gregory, says that Fuld “has improved” his attitude and “made it more comfortable for people to speak.”
This is a phenomenon the must be cut off at the knees (which the old Fuld would’ve already done, without compunction). It’s only a hop, skip and a jump from people not soiling themselves in your presence to Merrill Lynch.
The Survivor [NYT]