Once again, the analysts are trailing the market. Merrill Lynch has upgraded Morgan Stanley to “buy” from neutral:
13 Oct 2008 14:12 EDT *DJ Morgan Stanley Raised To Buy From Neutral By Merrill Lynch
It’s just a matter of time before the others now follow. Meanwhile, we hear that Trump Entertainment has been downgraded. That’s probably another of those “just a matter of time” scenarios too.
We knew that Morgan Stanley was in talks with a number of banks to discuss possible mergers. But until late tonight we only had one name: Wachovia. Now CNBC has dug up another name: Chinese bank Citic.
Morgan Stanley is in talks to possibly be acquired by Chinese bank Citic, sources in the U.S. and China have told CNBC.
No deal is certain at this time, however, and sources said that none was likely to be finalized Wednesday.
Morgan Stanley in Talks with Chinese Bank Citic [CNBC]
Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs are linking their lending to hedge funds to the market’s assessment of the credit worthiness of the investment banks. Morgan Stanley will reportedly evaluate the amount of leverage it will supply to hedge funds based on the price of its own credit insurance pricing. Goldman is said to be linking its willingness to provide loans to hedge funds based on its bond prices.
The report of both changes ran in the Financial Times. The changes would limit the ability of hedge funds to borrow from either firm if borrowing by Morgan and Goldman became too expensive, indicating a lack of market confidence in the financial health of the firms.
In one sense, this seems a practical response to volatility in the credit markets, reducing exposure to hedge fund leverage as credit markets for financial companies become unsettled. It does, however, create a self-serving dynamic for the investment banks. If hedge funds taking the view that the companies have become unstable push up CDS or bond yields on the firms, they may find themselves unable to borrow from the firms. In other words, it gives the hedge funds an incentive not to bet against Goldman and Morgan.
The FT says the plans to link hedge fund leverage to the broader credit markets has been in the works for sometime. “These arrangements for determining the size of lending commitments to hedge fund clients were being put in place before the collapse of Bear Stearns,” Henny Sender writes. “But implementation has gathered pace as investment banks seek ways to guard against the sudden loss of confidence – and resulting withdrawal of market funding – that crippled Bear.”
MS and Goldman change approach to lending [Financial Times]
We’ve managed to get our hands on the responses to a survey Morgan Stanley took of its real estate department back in 2005. Even while the mortgage boom was ramping up, Morgan Stanley had serious retention and morale issues with this group. Eventually these responses were transformed into a management power point addressing the issue.
The responses range from trivial comments about beverages–there apparently wasn’t any Red Bull in the vending machines–to more serious issues about compensation. “Since we work harder a solution would be to increase our compensation,” one respondent says.
Many of the responses will be familiar to anyone who has worked in an investment bank–complaints about hours worked and feelings of being treated shabbily. “As the bottom rung of the ladder, I realize we have little to no control over our lives or what goes on in this place,” on of the Morgan Stanley employees says. “The trick is not to let us know that.”
Of course, complaints about co-workers also get mentioned. “There are certain associates and VPs which are extremely difficult and painful to work for. This is obviously something that cannot be eliminated, but should be mitigated wherever possible,” one person resigned to working for awful people writes.
After the jump, a link to download the entire set of responses.
Read more »
Remember when we asked for the identity of the Morgan Stanley trader accused of mismarking his book to the tune of $120 million? Morgan Stanley, which has been investigating the situation since last month, declined to name the trader, saying it is not yet clear whether the mismark was an error or fraud.
But London’s newspapers have been more forthcoming. The Evening Standard identifies the trader as a certain Matthew Piper, who is said to be in his late thirties.
Morgan Stanley Suspends Trader After $120m Gaff [HereIsTheCity]
Morgan Stanley announced that it suspended a senior fixed income trader on its London trading floor after discovering he had marked up positions on his books by $120 million. Morgan Stanley has told the Financial Services Authority and begun an internal investigation. They say that while the $120 million is not material to their financial results, they disclosed the misdeed and investigation to send a clear message of “zero tolerance” for such shenanigans.
All well and good we suppose. But they didn’t go far enough. We want to know who this mismarking trader was. Send your guesses to email@example.com or leave a comment below.
Morgan Stanley suspends London dealer [Guardian]
In an era when we’ve all come to expect surprise results from investment banks, Morgan Stanley handed over some completely unsurprising results this morning. The earnings per share, at 95 cents, were just about in line with expectations. (Although what that means in when the highest analyst prediction was twice the lowest is unclear.) John Mack, Chairman and CEO, issued a statement telling us that things that you know were down and the things most competitors are getting right were done right at Morgan Stanley also. In short, fixed income and asset management sucked. Prime brokerage and equity derivatives did well. Also, they have a “world-class international franchise.” So everything will be alright then.