Third Point

Bill Ackman Doesn’t Need Your Pity

Not even a historic PR disaster leading to a 25% surge in the shares of its $1 billion short can keep Pershing Square down this year. Read more »

Dan Loeb Would Like That $1.4 Billion Back

Remember, back in October, when Dan Loeb announced that Third Point would be returning about 10% of the $14 billion it had, to “moderate” its growth or something? Well, that may have moderated things a little too much, and even though Third Point’s fat 6% return has it managing $15 billion seven months later after cutting those checks, Loeb is feeling inspired to write a few more letters, and needs a few more bucks to do so. Read more »

Remember when Third Point manager Dan Loeb told auction house Sotheby’s that it didn’t know dick about contemporary art? And demanded its chairman and CEO, William Ruprecht do the honorable thing and fire himself? And noted that Sotheby’s management in general was a joke? And (“jokingly”) described his campaign to “undermine the credibility” of Ruprecth as a “holy Jihad“? Now that the two sides have made nice– and Sotheby’s has given Third Point three spots on its board–, the auctioneers are going to compensate the Maestro of Mockery for his troubles. Read more »

Did Third Point chief Dan Loeb recently tell friends he had a plan to “undermine the credibility” of Sotheby’s Chairman and CEO William Ruprecht? Yes. Did Ruprecht refer to Loeb as “scum”? Indeed. Are the two men going to let either of these things make Sotheby’s board meetings, at which they’ll be working together, awkward in the slightest? Of course not. Why would you think that? Read more »

Savor this moment, Dow Chemical. Treasure it. Never let it go. Read more »

Proxy Advisory Endorses Dan Loeb’s Art Expertise

ISS thinks that Sotheby’s shareholders should give Dan Loeb exactly twice as many seats as he could have had without engaging in a proxy fight. Glass Lewis, less so. Read more »

Back in October, hedge fund manager Dan Loeb sent a letter William Ruprecht, to the CEO of Sotheby’s, in which he made the following points:

  • Sotheby’s is completely ignorant about contemporary art
  • Ruprecht is overpaid
  • Sotheby’s is a joke compared to Christie’s
  • In spite of all this, Sotheby’s future can be salvaged, but it’ll take firing Ruprecht and adding Loeb and a few directors of Loeb’s choice to the board

Shockingly, Sotheby’s did not appreciate the constructive criticism, and adopted a poison pill to ward off Loeb and Co. Last week, Loeb reiterated his position in an open letter to Sotheby’s shareholders, in which he underscored that, in his professional opinion, the auction house knows nothing about selling art. (He also reminded them to vote Loeb ’14 at the company’s annual meeting in May.)

Team Sotheby’s, apparently sick of Loeb’s shit, did what any corporate entity does when it’s decided its done play Mr. Nice Guy: assembled its top men and women in a conference room and declared that no one could leave until they’d come up with a 53-slide PowerPoint rebuttal.

Said rebuttal can be viewed in its entirety here, but it mostly boils down to: Read more »