Not only did the Beard of Understanding land some prime modeling gigs on the success of his Times spread, but he’s reached the penultimate step toward being named Most Popular girl in school (all that’s left to do is blow the editor-in-chief of the year book, who tallies up senior superlative ballots). A new CNBC survey of “Wall Street professionals” shows a waning faith in the economy at large but a waxing faith in he who would sooner say the ‘r’ word than engage in that or any other hair removal process. Thirty-nine “money managers, investment strategists, and professional economists” gave Ben a “B” for his work this month, up from January’s “B-.” It would’ve been an “A-” but Charlie Gasparino’s mechanic said he was “less than impressed” with the Chairman’s work, and failed his Harvard ass.
Fed Chairman Doing Better, But the US Economy Isn’t [CNBC]
The Fed
There’s a lot to love in this interview with Neil Cavuto and Don Trump (Cavuto’s expressions (he’s definitely been practicing these, go to 9:02 and tell me I’m wrong); Cavuto’s jokes (DT: “Ben Bernanke could’ve been a leader, instead he was a follower” NC: “He should’ve read Think Big And Kick Ass In Business And In Life“) ; Cavuto’s ass-kissing (“I love when you say ‘You’re fired,’ I love when you do that”) but if I had to choose my favorite moment I’d go with:
Trump: If i were president right now, you’d have $30 oil. I would call up Saudi Arabia and say “That fucking price is coming down and it’s coming down now” and you know what? They’d lower that price so quick and it’d be so easy.
Cavuto: What if they didn’t?
Trump: They will.
-
Posted in:
The Fed
Caption Contest Wednesday: I Stroke My Beard As If To Say, “Yeah, I Know Shit”
By Joe Weisenthal
(While I’m stroking it, I’m also saying, please do not question my judgment in agreeing to pose like this. Not that I have to defend myself to you, but I think this is exactly the way America would like to see its Fed chairman, at this time especially. Anyway. Email me for the pics that didn’t make it to print: beardofunderstanding (all one word) at yahoo dot com.)
Some punk analyst (No really, some Punk Ziegel & Co. analyst) is accusing the Fed of forcing the major banks to borrow from the discount window. Market analyst Richard Bove thinks Bernanke sweetly serenaded JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wachovia and Citi to a tune of “Come to my window / Borrow cash, even though you don’t need to / Come to my window / I’ll cut rates soon.” From MSN:
The discount rate, though lower than it was last week, is still higher than the 5.25 percent federal funds rate, which is what banks pay to borrow from one another. Plus, because of the $38 billion in cash the Fed has pumped into the system, banks are charging only 4.9 percent for overnight loans, Bove said. A statement from three of the banks that borrowed from the discount window said they wanted to “demonstrate the potential value of the Fed’s credit facility and encourage other banks to use it.”
The whole thing was a “P.R. gig,” like getting knocked up by David Crosby. The banks took the dough to remove the stigma on borrowing money from the Fed as a credit line of last resort (and of getting inseminated by a drugged out musician), and to encourage smaller banks to do the same.
Ahead of the Bell: Federal Reserve [AP via MSN Money]
Some quick and mixed reactions to todays Fed Statement. “The Fed eliminated a reference to a moderation in the housing market’s downturn and was vague enough on its future intentions to convince the assembled parties on trading floors and at computer desks that all was still ok, and if it wasn’t, the Fed would come in for the big rescue, or something like that,” Market Beat’s David Gaffen wrote under taunting headline “Stagflation Rules! Buy Stocks!”
“The Fed’s statement was as close to sarcasm as you might ever expect to hear from that august body,” Barry Ritholz said.
“Quiet Carney. I’m trying to pretend I know John Mack’s assistant,” Bess Levin told us.
We’re hardly going to pretend we have some deeper insight into the meaning of today’s Fed statement than the equity markets or the bond markets. (Or that we can tell whether the various movements of stocks and bonds following the release mean equities and bonds agree or disagree on the statement.) So we’re going to ask the smartest people we know—you—in the best way we know how—a reader poll.
The Federal Reserve is meeting for the last time this year today. A statement is expected a quarter past two this afternoon. So we thought we’d take a quick reader poll in advance of the statement on the question of what the Fed will do.
| Make Free Online Polls |

Has there been a news story about JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon in the last year that hasn’t mentioned his famous falling out with his mentor Sanford Weill? Dimon gets the CEO slot, and it’s all about getting fired by Weill. Dimon is “expected” to get the chairman of the board seat? Yep, more about Sandy. Now the members are voting him onto the board of directors at the the Federal Reserve, and sure enough it’s mostly about the famous break-up.
How is Dimon ever expected to move on if everyone keeps bringing up his ex?
Jamie Dimon may end up succeeding Sanford Weill after all — at the New York Federal Reserve.
Eight years after Weill fired Dimon, his heir-apparent at Citigroup Inc., Dimon is slated to replace his former mentor as a director at the Fed’s New York branch. Dimon, 50, is now chief executive officer of rival JPMorgan Chase & Co. Weill, 73, retired in April as chairman of Citigroup, the biggest U.S. bank. His term as a Fed director ends Dec. 31.
The Fed’s members began casting their votes yesterday for Dimon and PepsiCo Inc. CEO Indra Nooyi, who’s seeking reelection. Citigroup and JPMorgan, the third-biggest U.S. lender by assets, are members of the New York Fed, which helps supervise the industry and set monetary policy.
Dimon worked alongside Weill for 16 years, beginning as his assistant at American Express Co. The two native New Yorkers shared a knack for making profitable acquisitions and slashing expenses. Their working relationship ended when Weill ousted Dimon following a series of personal and policy disputes.
JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon Nominated to Replace Weill at NY Fed [Bloomberg]
-
Posted in:
Ben Bernanke
The Dippin’ Demogrizzle Transition: Will We Treat Future Generizzles Fairly?
By John Carney
Ben Bernanke’s speech to the Washington Economic Club put through the Gizoogle treatment.
- In com’n decades, many forces will shape our economy n our society, but in all likelihood no single factor will have as pervasive an effect as tha aging of our populizzles In 2008, as tha first poser of tha baby-boom generizzles reach tha minimum age fo` receiv’n Social Security benefits, there wizzle be `bout five work’n-age thugz (between tha ages of twenty n sixty-four) in tha United States fo` each person aged sixty-five n drug deala n those sixty-five n cracka wizzle makes up `bout 12 percent of tha U.S. populizzles Those statistics is set ta change rapidly, at least relative ta tha speed wit which one thinks of demogrizzles changes as usually weed-smokin’ place.
For example, perpetratin’ ta tha intermediate projections of tha Social Security Trustees, by 2030–by W-H-to-tha-izzich time most of tha baby playa will have retired–the ratio of those of work’n age ta those sixty-five n cracka wiznill hizzy fallen fizzle fizzle ta `bout three. By that time, olda Americans wizzy constitute `bout 19 percent of tha U.S. populizzles a greata share thiznan of tha populizzle of Florida today motha fucka.
This bustin’ demogrizzles transition is tha result both of tha reduction in fertility tizzle followed tha post-World War II baby bizzy n of mobbin’ increazes in life expectancy.
Although crazy ass nigga expect U.S. fertility rates ta remain close ta current levels fo` tha foreseeable future, life expectancy is projected ta continue ris’n. As a conseqizzles tha anticipated increaze in tha share of tha populizzle aged sixty-five or olda is not simply tha result of tha retirizzles of tha baby gangsta tha “pig in a python” image often used ta describe tha effects of thiznat generizzles on U.S. demogrizzles is straight trippin’ Instead, over tha N-to-tha-izzext few decades tha U.S. populizzles is expected ta become progressively killa n remain so, even as tha baby-boom generizzles passes frizzom tha scene.
As you may know, populizzles aging is also cruisin’ in mizzle otha countries. Indeed, many of these countries is brotha along than tha United States in this process n have already begun ta experience mizzle F-U-Double-Lizzy some of its social n economic implications.
Even a brotha of tha dismal science like me would find it difficult ta describe increas’n life expectancy as bad news with the S-N-double-O-P. Longa, pimp lives wizzle provide many benefits fo` individuals, families, n society as a whole. Playa an aging populizzles also creates some important economic challenges. For example, many observa have noted tha difficult choices that aging will create fo` fiscal policy killa in tha years ta come, n I will briefly note some of those budgetary issues today. But tha implications of demogrizzles change can also be viewed fizzle a pusha economic perspectizzle As I wizzill discuss, tha broada perspective shows clearly thiznat adequate preparizzles fo` tha blunt-rollin’ demogrizzle transition may wizzell involve signifizzle adjustments in our patterns of consumption, wizzork effort, n mobbin’ Ultimatizzles tha extent of these adjustments depends on how we drug deala explicitly or implicitly–to distribute tha economic burdens of tha aging of our populizzles across generizzles Inherent in tizzy choice is questions of intergenerizzles equity n economic efficiency, questions that is difficult ta answa definitively but is neverthizzles among tha mizzy critical that we face as a nation.
Actually we have no idea what year Fed chief Ben Bernanke wrote his “Hippie Dictionary.” But we’re glad he did. It’s actually quite good, and nicely post-modern with its inter-textual self-referentiality. Here are the excerpts reprinted by Bloomberg.
Bird — a lady as in “cute chick” or “henpecked”
Dig — to like, to enjoy, as “The hippie undertaker digs his work.”
Down trip — a drag
Drag — a down trip
Hang-up — a neurosis or fetish
In gear — the cat’s pajamas
Lie-In — a form of peaceful protest that often fails when demonstrators go to sleep
Square — someone who stays home New Year’s Eve to hear Guy Lombardo play “Auld Lang Syne”
Straight — as in “stiff” (see “dig”)
Swing — what someone does who thinks Guy Lombardo is a football coach (see square)
Trip — a rocket flight without the rocket
Bernanke’s Hippie Dictionary Updated: Caroline Baum [Bloomberg]
[Note: Apparently, Bernanke's dictionary was originally published in connection with a school play. The Dillon Herald published excerpts from the dictionary in honor of Ben Bernanke Day, and we picked it up from a Bloomberg story we came across while reading Eddy Elfenbein's Crossing Wall Street.]
When we were in college, a competing student paper ran into trouble paying its bills. Our paper, which was notorious for its outlandishly reactionary viewpoint, offered to financially bail out the other if it would modify its editorial policy in certain ways, including supporting a ban on fractional reserve banking and the abolition of the Federal Reserve. These fond memories were brought back this afternoon when we read Peter Cohan’s item speculating that the Fed may be playing politics with interest rates.
Many polls indicate that the Republican party is unpopular and that Democrats are therefore likely to make gains in November. How do interest rates figure into the election in November? With consumer credit card borrowing at near record levels of $2.2 trillion in June and 26.8% of mortgages in adjustable rates, each time the Fed raises rates, it puts the squeeze on millions of voters who are already paying close to $3 a gallon to drive to work.
So if the Fed raises rates, it turns up the anger boil against the party in power. If the Fed can hold off raising rates until after the election, it will take away a bit of potential pain from voters who might be making up their mind about whether to keep incumbents in power. Meanwhile, the 7% increase in labor costs translates into more money in the pockets of these potential voters.
Is election pressure keeping the Fed from controlling inflation? [BloggingStocks]
We’re decidedly ignorant when it comes to people who have job titles like “Senator.” That may or not be a good thing. Maybe knowing something about those types would help us understand the world better. But the cost of paying attention and seeing through the spin seems enormous. So our ignorance is probably pretty rational.
So we can’t help the Big Picture. But maybe you can. Here’s today’s inquiry.
Its easy to point fingers, but let’s get to the heart of the matter — how much of the present inflation is due to ultra low rates? Huge deficits? Unfunded tax cuts?
Phrased differently, who is more responsible for the present inflationary run up — Bernanke or Bunning’s Congressional Colleagues?
Senator Bunning? [TheBigPicture]
