Is Syms, the off-price clothing store chain, secretly a real estate firm?

Author:
Updated:
Original:

That's the theory that the New York Observer puts forth.
According to several shareholders and some outside observers, the Syms family, who owns a 57% stake in the company, "is hiding its plans in order to depress the stock price." Their plan, investors allege, is to buy back a larger share of the stock, build a tall building at their shop in the Financial District, and "reap more of the dividends."
This conspiracy theory, backed up by actions taken by Syms in the past year, that seem to indicate something is amiss.


The company, with a board of directors controlled by the Syms family, attempted to delist from the NYSE this past December, claiming they wanted to save $750,000 a year on SEC regulation fees. Skeptics say the truth is that the family wanted to cover up its next maneuvers, made easier by being listed on the Pink Sheets, where there are less disclosure requirements. Such a move caused the share price to drop by 27% in early January; however, shareholders were infuriated, filing a lawsuit against the company. Syms was soon forced to register with Nasdaq, unveiling the cloud of secrecy that had permeated.
In its April 25 annual report, "Syms revealed that it had purchased 16,500 square feet of air rights from 44 Trinity Place, the building next to its flagship at 42 Trinity Place, for $3.1 million." The purchase was made a week after Syms announced its intention to delist.
Then, on May 22nd, the company bought 67 Greenwich Street for $8 million. The company cited the need to "protect its property at 42 Trinity Place from encroachment," though investors were puzzled as to what encroachment was occurring.
Regardless of the theories abound, management has denied any claims of it being a real estate company. However, some continue to believe that the Syms family is determined to make the company private again.
This is a rather ingenious plan by the Syms clan. I mean, it's kind of like assembling the worst baseball team ever, losing as many games as possible, and driving down attendance to break the stadium lease so that you can move the team to Miami. Or maybe it isn't.
Whatever, I say we all buy stock in Syms and drive the price up to stop such an injustice from happening. *
--Senior Syms heckler Travis
*Disclosure: John Carney's brother owns Syms stock.

Related

Formula 1 Heiresses Recommend Real Estate, Dog Facials

Last year, Petra Ecclestone, daughter of Formula 1 boss Bernie Ecclestone, gave the California housing market a boost when she bought 90210 widow Candy Spelling's 57,000 square foot mansion for $85 million, as a crash pad for when she's in Los Angeles (she also owns a six-story house in London’s Chelsea neighborhood purchased for £56 million). Around the same time, Petra's sister, Tamara, paid $70 million for "a 16,000-square-foot historic brick home across the road from Kensington Palace." And while some would simply write the Sisters Ecclestone off as spoiled rich girls whose parents have footed the bill for these places (mom is Slavica Radic, a former Croatian model who lent Petra $82.4 million for the LA house), the Wall Street Journal sees what the haters will not: a couple of savvy investors who you might consider asking to manage your money. In an interview with the paper, which dubbed the Sisters Ecclestone "The First New Family of Real Estate," Tamara explained her investment thesis: Wearing Lululemon yoga pants and a fitted hoodie, Ms. Ecclestone sat in her living room, overlooking an outdoor lap pool, and explained that she sees their real estate holdings as smart purchases. "I think London [property] is a really good investment," she said. "There's no bank in the world that can give you that return." Ecclestone also shared some pearls of wisdom re: dealing with critics looking to bring you down, of which her fellow billionaires, newly minted or old, should take note. Last year Ms. Ecclestone starred in a reality program about her life called "Billion $$ Girl." One episode depicted her taking her dogs to Harrod's for facials and pedicures. Another shows her debating cancelling a meeting because she woke up with a pimple on her face. Her participation in the show, in the midst of a recession, drew criticism from many, including her father. Mr. Ecclestone said he could barely make it through one episode. "I spoke to her before and said… 'They're never going to show you in a good light,' " he said. "She was stupid to do it." Ms. Ecclestone took the criticisms in stride. "It's like water off a duck's back," she said. The First New Family Of Real Estate [WSJ]