CNBC Slips Personal Porn Agenda Into Conversation

Author:
Updated:
Original:

Under the guise of discussing the woes faced by Playboy. Like we're falling for that one. The spank rag is apparently considering printing fewer issues, and raising its cover price, on account of being faced with the issue of no one paying for porn-- especially when it's not live action-- anymore. Bill Griffiths, claiming he has no idea how much a copy will set you back these days (right) casually wonders, "when was the last time anyone bought an issue of Playboy?" failing to disclose that the real reason he'd like to know is that your answers will determine whether or not the network goes with the previously planned "Bitches o' CNBC" as a glossy or springs for the production costs to put this thing out on DVD. Do them a solid and answer honestly how you most frequently consume porn. Either way, you're about to see a whole lot more Charlie Gasparino.

Related