Philadelphia SEC Chief Wants To Know Where You Went To Business School, And Who You Might've Slept With There

Author:
Publish date:

Among other things. Because it's very likely that whoever you were sharing tips with back then, you're still giving tips to today, in the form of material non-public information, according to Daniel Hawke, who is heading up a new team out of Philly "charged with cracking down on a variety of market abuses." Team Hawke will be conducting "trader-based investigations rather than going security by security," and if your boy from Wharton or the Jack Welch MBA institute gave you a hot tip he wasn't supposed to, Hawke's gonna find out, just like he'll know about the profit you made from the info Bambi from Beamers stuck in your ear last night.

Much of the initial detective work that Hawke's group is doing relies heavily on computers. The team cross-checks trading data on dozens of stocks with personal information about individual traders, such as where they went to business school or where they used to work.

Hawke said his investigators are looking for patterns of "behavior by traders across multiple securities" and seeing if there are any common relationships or associations between those traders.
His stock sleuths then try to determine whether those traders who are wheeling-and-dealing in the same group of securities are doing so because they are simply smarter and luckier than other investors, or have benefited from improper access to confidential information.

Philadelphia, where rogue traders dare not tread [Reuters]

Related

Business School Applicants Having None Of This "Show Us You Can Speak Without Paying A Consultant $500 To Show You How" Crap

After years of receiving scripted answers to questions from would-be business school students re: why they want to go to Harvard/Wharton/Stanford/Sloan or what they think of a company's earnings potential or where they see themselves in five to ten years or what they ate for breakfast, admissions officers have lately been taking a new tack in an attempt to see the "real" side of applicants. Hoping to get a little "unrehearsed honesty" and insight into who these people really are, prospective students are being asked to submit "reflections" ("a short, off-the-cut note that must be submitted within 24 hours of an admissions interview") and take part in "team-based discussions," for which they're told to "relax, be genuine," not worry about giving the "right" answer, and just say what they really think, rather than what a coach told them to say they think. Unfortunately, Harvard and Wharton officials apparently have no idea who they're dealing with here. You can't make future b-school students relax and be genuine! You can't! You won't!