Goldman Sachs De-Registers Mr. Fantabulous In UK

Author:
Publish date:

First off, nobody's doing this because they're mad at him. It should be reiterated that while Goldman did indeed strip Fabrice Tourre of something somewhat essential to working with clients, they only did so because he's on his voluntary leave and won't be needing it right now. He's off in France, working through some stuff, and when he's ready to rejoin his colleagues, they'll be happy to have him back. Although-- and I'm not saying anyone would even think such a thing-- on the off chance Lloyd decides GS is already busting at the seams with fabulousness and couldn't possibly pack anymore in, it would be a good idea for Tourre to have a Plan B. A hedge fund would be the safe option (and he should have no problem raising cash, what with his famous reach-around) but let's think outside of the box on this one. What's FabTo's next career move?

Related

Goldman Sachs Can Fix This

A week ago today, a man named Greg Smith resigned from Goldman Sachs. As a sort of exit interview, Smith explained his reasons for departing the firm in a New York Times Op-Ed entitled "Why I Am Leaving Goldman Sachs." The equity derivatives VP wrote that Goldman had "veered so far from the place I joined right out of college that I can no longer in good conscience say I identify with what it stands for." Smith went on to note that whereas the Goldman of today is "just about making money," the Goldman he knew as a young pup "revolved around teamwork, integrity, a spirit of humility, and always doing right by our clients." It was a culture that made him "love working for the firm" and its absence had stripped him of "pride and belief" he once held in the place. While claiming that Goldman Sachs has become virtually unrecognizable from the institution founded by Marcus (Goldman) and Samuel (Sachs), which put clients ahead of its own interests, is hardly a new argument, there was something about Smith's words that gave readers a moment's pause. He was so deeply distraught over the differences between the Goldman of 2012 and the Goldman of 2000 (when he was hired) that suggested...more. That he'd seen things. Things that had made an imprint on his soul. Things that he couldn't forget. Things that he held up in his heart for how Goldman should be and things that made it all the more difficult to ignore when it failed to live up to that ideal. Things like this: