Skip to main content

Vikram Pandit's Social Calendar Totally Open To Attend Obama's Financial Reg Signing

  • Author:
  • Updated:
    Original:

Jamie and Lloyd weren't invited (not that they'd slum it at something like this anyway), and James Gorman, Robert Wolf, Brian Moynihan and Bob Diamond declined to attend having other plans but Vikram will be there, Mr. President! With bells on!

When President Barack Obama signs the financial overhaul bill into law on Wednesday, many of the most recognizable faces in the banking world won’t be among the hundreds of people in attendance. Bank of America Corp. CEO Brian Moynihan was invited but can’t attend. Same goes for Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman and UBS Americas CEO Robert Wolf, a close friend of Obama. Barclays PLC President Bob Diamond was invited, though it’s unclear if he’ll be there. Citigroup Inc. CEO Vikram Pandit? He’ll be there.

Related

News

Vikram Pandit Let Lloyd Blankfein Down Easy

News

Vikram Pandit Was Complying With The Volcker Rule Before It Was A Rule

News

Vikram Pandit: Wine Connoisseur

News

Vikram Pandit: Rise Up

News

If You Had To Guess Which Wall Street CEO Was A Huge Lady Gaga Fan, Who Would It Be?

News

Vikram Pandit Is Committed To Getting Paid

If you didn't know Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit, you might think he enjoyed not being compensated for the work he does at Citigroup because for quite some time, he wasn't. And although the "I will only get paid $1/year until Citi turns a profit" exercise was fun for a while, he was pretty happy when the old jalopy started making money again, in part because it meant he could receive a paycheck. Then last April, his shareholders rejected the bank's executive pay plan, claiming the Big C "lets Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit collect millions of dollars in rewards too easily." And while it's possible that Citi shareholders are just a bunch of pricks who chose to overlook the fact that Uncle Vikula didn't collect squat for several years and once had an entire article written about the fact that lieutenants attributed a "new bounce in his step" to him daydreaming "the day when he is going to earn more than a $1 a year,” maybe they just assume that he doesn't care about getting paid either way? Anyway, here's Vickles, reminding anyone who forgot about the sacrifices he made and setting the record straight: “The board has this process with them, they’re going through it, and they are committed, as I am, to making sure that they resolve this,” Pandit said. “I want to get paid what the board thinks is right for me, for the job that I’ve done and for the incentives that they think I ought to have.” Pandit told lawmakers in 2009 that he would take a $1 annual salary until he restored the bank to profitability. Citigroup made a $21.7 billion profit for 2011 and 2010 combined, compared with a $29.3 billion loss for the two preceding years. “When the company was losing money, I stepped up and said I’ll take a dollar a year and I did, exactly for that reason, exactly the right thing to do,” Pandit said. For those having trouble separating the nice guy/don't want to offend anyone statement from what he's actually trying to say, a rough translation of the above would be: get me paid, bitch! Citigroup Will Resolve CEO Pay By End Of Year, Pandit Says [Bloomberg]

News

Happy Birthday, Vikram Pandit!

News

CEO's No One Gives A Rat's Ass About Bravely Gave The Finger To 2009's Compensation Trend