Poll: Should Nasdaq Be More Embarrassed About A) Screwing Up The Facebook IPO or B) Employing A Guy Nailed In A Nassau County Prostitution Sting Operation?

Author:
Updated:
Original:

The Post is thinking it's gotta be B...

It doesn’t get much more embarrassing than this. Nasdaq — which is still red-faced from its bungling of Facebook’s market debut last year — will have to determine the fate of an employee nabbed in a Nassau County prostitution sting this week. Kewho Min, 42, who is currently listed as a vice president for the exchange operator, was among 104 humiliated horndogs whose mug shots were plastered on a courtroom billboard on Monday as part of “Operation Flush the Johns.” Nasdaq, run by CEO Bob Greifeld, has already felt the sting of shame when it botched Facebook’s high-profile initial public offering in May 2012.

...but what say you? Once again, the options are:

a) Nasdaq should be more embarrassed about screwing up the Facebook IPO.
b) Nasdaq should be more embarrassed about employing a guy ensnared in a Nassau County prostitution sting op.

...plus:

c) Nasdaq should be equally embarrassed about both incidents.
d) Nasdaq shouldn't be embarrassed about either incident; so they fucked up a major IPO and pay a salary to a guy who answers in the affirmative to the question, "You lookin' for a good time?", so what?
e) Nasdaq should be more embarrassed about the hooker situation but I'd like to clarify that what tipped the scales for me was the fact that they were Long Island hookers. If this guy was picking them up anywhere else I'd definitely be saying A, Facebook.
f) other.

A Tricky Spot For Nasdaq [NYP]

Related

Nasdaq Fancies Itself Too Good For Weed

The stock exchange operator apparently has little interest in opening its doors to a "cannabis social networking company."

Nasdaq Officials Would Just Like To Point Out That Anyone Who Lost Money As A Result Of The Exchange's Incompetence Have Little To No Legal Recourse

Oh you can try a lawsuit but, historically speaking, it won't do shit. Nasdaq is sending a message to firms weighing lawsuits related to trading losses in Facebook's initial public offering: winning won't be easy. The exchange operator believes it is protected by its contracts with members and by its unusual legal status, which is rooted in its dual role as a regulatory body as well as a business that makes money running markets. Exchange officials in recent weeks have pointed out to analysts that Nasdaq has never been successfully sued over a trading error. "When you look at member agreements that people sign, it's quite explicit that they're bound by that accommodation policy," Robert Greifeld, Nasdaq's chief executive, said last week at a Sandler O'Neill + Partners conference, referring to legal agreements capping the exchange's payouts linked to system problems...Banks and brokers have estimated they lost hundreds of millions of dollars due to technical problems during Facebook's May 18 debut. The glitches forced Nasdaq to delay Facebook's opening, and left trades involving millions of shares unconfirmed for hours. Amid the chaos, traders were forced to guess their positions and place additional orders based on those estimates. When Nasdaq delivered the results of the trading Friday afternoon, many firms were caught off guard and scrambled to reposition. According to Greifeld, the last guy who tried to get his money back "trades on the pink sheets now" but take your best shot. Nasdaq Claims Strong Defense [WSJ] Related: UBS Not Sweating The Small Stuff