Bank Risk Officers No Longer Purely Ornamental

Author:
Updated:
Original:

Back in the day, as in before the financial crisis, risk officer got little to no respect by the banks that employed them. Possibly even less respect than their colleagues in HR, who could at least strike fear into hearts with merely a tap on the shoulder and a nod in the direction of the conference room. They mostly blended into the furniture, and their opinions and recommendations were given slightly less weight than the office plants. Then the risk takers made some "disastrously wrong" bets, throwing the global financial system into a pretty bad situation, and now? When the risk officers talk? People actually acknowledge that words are coming out of their mouths, instead of staring blankly at them and then doing whatever the hell they want.

At Wells Fargo, some executives pushed last year to relaunch a program letting homeowners get a line of credit secured by the equity in their house—and pay only the interest due on the loan. Such credit lines have been scarce since the financial crisis, but the executives saw them as a way to boost revenue as housing prices climb. The bank's chief risk officer, Michael Loughlin, said no. He proposed requiring regular payments that shrink the borrower's debt over time and didn't budge when told Wells Fargo might lose business to other lenders. The other bankers agreed to go along with his decision.

"Five years ago, if the risk group recommended against a strategy or product, it might just be one part of a debate," he says. Now, "when we say no, it's usually no." Mr. Loughlin is an example of the naysayers who are gaining power and multiplying in number across the U.S. banking industry as financial institutions bend to pressure from regulators to make their operations safer and simpler following the financial crisis that began in 2008.

After Crisis, Risk Officers Gain More Clout at Banks [WSJ]

Related

Small-Time Crooks No Longer Welcome At Wells Fargo, Bank Of America

Richard Eggers knows what we're talking about. The former farm boy speaks deliberately, can’t remember the last time he got a speeding ticket, and favors suspenders, horn-rimmed glasses and plaid shirts. But the 68-year-old Vietnam veteran is still too risky for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, which fired him on July 12 from his $29,795-a-year job as a customer service representative. Egger’s crime? Putting a cardboard cutout of a dime in a washing machine in Carlisle on Feb. 2, 1963. “It was a stupid stunt and I’m not real proud of it, but to fire somebody for something like this after seven good years of employment is a dirty trick when you come right down to it,” said Eggers of Des Moines. “And they’re doing this kind of thing all across the country.” Big banks have been firing low-level employees like Eggers since the issuance of new federal banking employment guidelines in May 2011 and new mortgage employment guidelines in February. The tougher standards are meant to weed out executives and mid-level bank employees guilty of transactional crimes, like identity fraud or mortgage fraud, but they are being applied across-the-board thanks to $1-million-a day fines for noncompliance...Bank of America has embarked on a similar firing binge to shed any employee convicted of a criminal offense involving dishonesty, breach of trust or money laundering, employment attorneys say. Wells Fargo fires Des Moines worker for laundromat incident 49 years ago [DMR]