Here Are Some Books To Pretend You’ll Read On Your Imaginary Vacation

Make sure to pack these in your carry-on for the spring break you'll be taking in your mind!
Author:
Publish date:
Updated on

It’s been pretty cold in places like Manhattan, Greenwich and Boston. Perhaps you’ve noticed. In any event, this sort of thing has people dreaming of being on a beach somewhere other than New Jersey, where it is also cold, on which they like to fancy themselves kicking back and diving into a good book, when, in fact, we all know you’ll be reading research reports and a never-ending string of inane e-mails from colleagues in the unlikely event you make it to the Caribbean.

It seems JonesTrading��s Dave Lutz is among those who will be spending Spring Break in his office, because he has chosen to use his precious free time to run a poll of colleagues to see what they like to think they’d be reading if they weren’t also not going on vacation to escape the chill.

There’s plenty of the sort of fare you’d expect, like that really thick book about oil, a book about how fucked Europe is, that book where that hedge fund manager tells his stirring tale of standing up to Vladimir Putin and losing, the philosophy of Peter Thiel, Bill O’Reilly’s latest made-up war story that is also simultaneously the newest installment of his tin-foil-hat-type “Killing” series, and, of course, American Sniper. Also not unexpected are the presence of some prestige titles to sit ostentatiously next to the bed, unopened: The likes of a 30-year-old Paulo Coelho novel, some hifalutin historical fiction from 40 years ago and Donna Tartt’s The Goldfinch, showing just how far behind the Zeitgeist people buried in an Excel spreadsheet can be. Wall Streeters are even further behind on To Kill a Mockingbird, which they’ve named either because they’ve never read it or because they want to pretend they’ll brush up on it before pretending to read the sequel when it comes out later this year. Also, people are really into (or aspiring to be really into) the 1936Olympics this winter, for some reason.

What books are you telling people you’re reading this winter?

Top 16 Books on Wall Street’s Spring Break Reading List [WSJ MoneyBeat blog]

Related

News

Now Here Are Some Guys Who Knew How To Rip Off A Client

One aspect of good salesmanship is that you have to offer an attractive proposition not merely to the abstract entity that is your nominal client - El Paso, Italy, Greece - but also to the specific human being who is your contact at that client. Telling a corporate treasurer who is five years from retirement that a trade will have a significantly positive NPV due to huge cash flows in years 11-15 is not always as effective a sales technique as buying him a nice steak and an evening of unclothed entertainment. I suspect, though, that the latter strategy is more highly correlated with whatever you're selling ending up on the front page/op-ed page/sec.gov. Anyway, I definitely admire these guys for this particular con*: The SEC alleges that Argyll Investments LLC’s purported stock-collateralized loan business is merely a fraud perpetrated by James T. Miceli and Douglas A. McClain, Jr. to acquire publicly traded stock from corporate officers and directors at a discounted price from market value, separately sell the shares for full market value in order to fund the loan, and use the remaining proceeds from the sale of the collateral for their own personal benefit. Miceli, McClain, and Argyll typically lied to borrowers by explicitly telling them that their collateral would not be sold unless a default occurred. However, since Argyll had no independent source of funds other than the borrowers’ collateral, Argyll often sold the collateral prior to closing the loan and then used the proceeds to fund it. Got it? Argyll gave corporate executives margin loans at 50-70% loan-to-value based on the market price of their stock (based on the volume weighted average price over five days leading up to the closing of the loan). They took the stock as "collateral." They then trousered the stock and sold it for, y'know, 100% of the market value, with 50-70% of that funding the loan and the remaining 30-50% funding miscellaneous expenses that presumably included unclothed entertainment for themselves. The loans had three-year terms and were not prepayable for 12-18 months, so the expected life of the scam was at least 12 months (but see below).