Marc Andreessen And Mark Zuckerberg Are BFFs, And Pesky Board Negotiations Can't Change That

Smiley-face-laden texts between besties are a natural part of Silicon Valley board decisions.
(Getty Images)

(Getty Images)

To anyone convinced that Silicon Valley is a cold and unfeeling place that sees human society as an accretion of inefficiencies to be disrupted and reengineered for profit, observe the touching friendship between tech buddies Marc Andreessen and Mark Zuckerberg. Andreessen was one of Zuckerberg's first friends – and funders – in the Valley. In return, Zuckerberg gave him a seat on the board in 2008, and the two have remained tight since.

But their friendship might just be too big for this petty world. A group of Facebook investors is suing over the bromance, concerned that smiley-face-laden text messages Marc sent Mark during sensitive board deliberations represented a conflict of interest during a contentious vote over Zuckerberg's control of the company. Nothing that beautiful can last.

The dispute goes back to last year, when Zuckerberg wanted to sell a bunch of shares but maintain voting control of the company. To do so would require a stock split that would dilute other voting shares, potentially to the detriment of other stakeholders. The proposal was controversial, so the board created a special committee to represent shareholders on the matter, composed of Susan Desmond-Hellmann, Erskine Bowles and, of course, Zuckerberg bestie Andreessen. (Board member Peter Thiel was busy with other legal matters, presumably.)

You can guess what happened next.

While on the committee, Andreessen slipped Zuckerberg information about their progress and concerns, helping Zuckerberg negotiate against them, according to court documents. [...]

When the time came for the committee to ask Zuckerberg questions on a conference call, Andreessen warned the Facebook founder about what he would be asked before directors posed the questions. While the committee grilled Zuckerberg about why he wanted a special class of stock, Andreessen sent the CEO text messages to explain which of his arguments weren't working and why, according to messages quoted in court filings. During one March 4 call, Andreessen gave Zuckerberg live updates, both negative ("This line of argument is not helping. ☺") and positive ("NOW WE'RE COOKING WITH GAS"), according to texts provided by Facebook’s lawyers and cited in court filings.

"Andreessen even told Zuckerberg that he was working to protect Zuckerberg’s personal interests through the Special Committee process,'' according to the filings.

So maybe it looks kind of bad when a supposedly independent board member secretly schemes with the chief executive while purporting to represent shareholders. One particularly cringeworthy example: When the two prevailed over Bowles, who initially looked askance at the whole deal, Andreessen texted, “The cat's in the bag and the bag's in the river.”

"Does that mean the cat's dead?" Zuckerberg replied, dumbfounded. To which Andreessen said: "Mission accomplished ☺"

Whose mission, you ask? Well, this is a tech giant – normal publicly-traded-company rules don't apply.

But in Silicon Valley, sometimes the conventional setups for companies don't work. Keeping a controlling and visionary founder happy can lead to the high-risk, high-reward bets that keep companies thriving, said David Larcker, a legal professor focusing on corporate governance at Stanford's Graduate School of Business.

"Silicon Valley is a pretty networked place," Larcker said. "People know each other, have done deals together -- but it doesn't mean that governance is out of control or it's the Wild West or something. It could be the case that what the board is doing is actually accretive to shareholders." Zuckerberg's chats with Andreessen may just be "part of the dialogue" needed to evaluate the proposal, he said.

Facebook shareholders may think they're investing in an advertising company or a social media network or whatever, but what they're really invested in is a guy named Zuckerberg. And his very special friendship.

The company adds, in a statement: “Facebook is confident that the special committee engaged in a thorough and fair process to negotiate a proposal in the best interests of Facebook and its shareholders.”

Facebook's Investors Criticize Marc Andreessen for Conflict of Interest [Bloomberg]


Screen Shot 2017-09-20 at 5.17.24 PM

Sheryl Sandberg Leans In To Take Public Beating On Mark Zuckerberg's Behalf

Facebook's fuck-up is on Sheryl because The Zuck is woke now.

What If Mark Zuckerberg Wore A 3-Piece Suit And A Monocle To The Facebook Roadshow?

What if Mark Zuckerberg wore cutoff jean shorts and a mesh Hawaii 69 football jersey to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a Mr. Peanut costume to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a tuxedo tee-shirt to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg dressed as Robocop for the IPO roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore Crocs to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg entered the roadshow as a member of the Lollipop Guild? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore Capri pants to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a wetsuit to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a Lacoste polo with an argyle sweater wrapped around his neck to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore the Hannibal Lechter mask from Silence of the Lambs to the Facebook roadshow? Would things have turned out differently? If Zuckerberg had left the hoodie at home? One guy says yes. "I felt that had Mr. Zuckerberg worn a jacket instead of a hoodie (showing them that he respected them enough to "dress up"), he would have made a statement to them that he cares about their needs, and will act in their best interest. He chose not to make that statement, and the current share price demonstrates that investors have chosen not to support Facebook shares. All of this is iterative. Had Facebook issued 10 million shares instead of 421 million, the stock would probably be much higher. However, had Mr. Zuckerberg worn a jacket and reassured investors that he is aligned with their expectations, perhaps more people would be stepping in to buy now." So...yeah.