Skip to main content

Investor Relations, Shanghai Style

Don't complain about your investors unless you've been held captive overnight for a trading loss that isn't your fault.
USGFX staff sleep in their office during an investor dispute. (WeChat)

USGFX staff sleep in their office during an investor dispute. (WeChat)

Anyone who invests other people's money for a living knows well the pains of dealing with those other people. Investors often operate under the assumption that by paying someone else for a financial service they've insulated themselves from ever losing a cent. Much unpleasantness can ensue.

But chances are any money managers reading this haven't had an experience even remotely like that of Union Standard Group Forex, an Australian brokerage whose Shanghai office just received a particularly direct message from aggrieved investors:

USGFX said that up to 50 investors entered their offices Wednesday afternoon, initially taking 20 staff hostage. Most staff were let go but three staff from China and Taiwan continued to be held in the offices as of Friday, USFGX said on its WeChat account.
Local news reports say food and water were brought to the offices and that one of the employees may have received minor injuries in a scuffle. Photographs posted by the company on WeChat showed CCTV footage of the confrontation, with staff of the brokerage scuffling and arguing with a group of people. Other images appear to show staff sleeping on the floor of a conference room.

The investors are apparently incensed over losing a cumulative $2.6 million in currency trades that went awry. Around 20 staff were held hostage to begin with, but apparently most of them were freed. As of midday Friday, Shanghai time, a handful remained captive.

As is usually the case, the brokerage seems to be getting blamed for someone else's error:

Staff said the stand-off related to trading losses made on behalf of investors from China's northeast, and a trader who acted on their behalf was at the centre of the dispute.

So take heart, embattled hedgies. Your investor issues could be far, far worse.

Investors hold staff hostage at Australian brokerage in Shanghai [FT]
USGFX: Australian currency trader staff in Shanghai held hostage in alleged extortion attempt []



Now *This* Is How You Do Investor Relations

“The biggest problem our industry faces today is you guys.”

Bar Works, a defunct startup that put coworking spaces in bars, used Chase as its main bank.

A Bunch of Chinese Investors Lost Their Shirts On A Brazen Coworking-Space Scam And Now JPMorgan Chase Is Getting The Blame

When a $36 million startup wires half its investor cash to Mauritius and the Isle of Man, perhaps you've got a problem.

Snap founders Evan Spiegel and Bobby Murphy

Snap Inc Is The Ultimate Thirst Trap

Now stop complaining and buy it.


NYSE Tests Out IEX-Style Speed Bump It Once Said Would 'Create A Calamity'

Brad Katsuyama is out there somewhere enjoying a celebratory non-fat yogurt.


Bubbles Are Getting Bubblier For Those Who Can't Distinguish Between Absolute And Relative

BAML compares bitcoin and XIV to the housing bubble and China because who cares anymore?

Hotel Off The Hook For Hedge Fund Investor Relations Girl's Dance Of Near Death

Remember Christine Mancision? To recap, she's the hedge fund investor relations lady who, back in October 2009, sued both the Hyatt Morristown and James Graeber, for an incident that took place on the evening of November 22, 2008, that incident being Graeber approaching her on the dance floor of his sister's wedding, grabbing her arm, taking her for a spin, and then "flinging" her off to the side, causing Mancision to make a hard crash landing on her wrist, which was "bent the complete opposite way" when she stood up. Her injuries were so extensive that they required surgery, a metal plate and three screws (as well as "eight months of grueling rehabilitation") and while she blames Graeber first and foremost, she also believes the Hyatt played a part in overserving the guy when he was, she says, "visibly intoxicated," and therefore added "fuel to the fire" in Graeber's dancing feet. Unfortunately for Mancision, Judge Robert Sweet has ruled that while she can go after Graeber for what happened that night, she cannot collect damages from the hotel, because there is not enough evidence to prove that the Hyatt served her dancing partner alcohol "when he was in a visibly intoxicated state" or that he was drunk at all at any point during the ceremony or reception, a conclusion he came to in part based on: The fact that only one person claims Graeber missed walking his mom down the aisle because he was out getting bombed and lost track of time. At her deposition, Mancision described how Henige told her that he had heard from Beley that Graeber was late to the wedding ceremony because he had been drinking and missed being able to walk his mother down the aisle. Graeber disputes any allegation that he was late or that one of his duties at the wedding was to walk his mother down the aisle...Mary Beley née Graeber, the bride, and Beley, the groom, have stated that Graeber was not late to the wedding. The fact that Graeber was not overheard asking Mancision, "May I dave this hance?" nor was he seen knocking over three bridesmaids in an attempt to catch the bouquet or shouting "NEXT!" 10 seconds into each speech. Mary Beley née Graeber, the bride, and Beley, the groom, have stated not time during the proceedings was his speech slurred or was the smell of alcohol detected on his breath and he was neither rowdy nor noisy nor were his eyes red. The fact that Graeber was not sent to bed early by the hotel staff, unlike some people. Emir Kobak, the Director of Banquets at the Hyatt, testified that Hyatt bartenders are trained to alert the Banquet Captain if a guest is having too many drinks, and that all bartenders attend alcohol awareness training every six months. Banquet Captain's Report reflects that Hyatt's policy as to excessive drinking was enforced at the wedding reception, that a female guest was cut off from the bar (and given water and coffee and was escorted to her room) and that the servers were directed not to serve shots notwithstanding some guests were requesting them. Some other details from that fateful night the judge threw in for our benefit: The suggestion there may have been some foot fetishists among the guests. Following dinner, Mancision and Henige, along with a few of his co-workers, proceeded to the dance floor where they danced in a group for about 15-20 minutes. Mancision was wearing shoes which had a 3-3.25 inch heel, although at least one witness descried the shoes as tall 4.5 inch stiletto shoes which were so "stunning" that they were a topic of conversation among guests. This: Graeber testified that, after he had been on the dance floor for about two songs, he and Holn were approached by a group of five to six women, including Mancision, who indicated by gestures and non-verbal conduct that they wanted to dance with Graeber and Holn. Mancision v. Hyatt Hotel Corporation et al - Document 57 [Justia] Earlier: Hedge Fund Investor Relations Girl’s Dance Of Near Death Cautionary Tale For Us All

Getty Images

How To Make A Million Bucks From Day Trading: A Ponzi Adventure

Harness the limitless loss-making potential of day traders for your next criminal enterprise!


If P2P Lenders Can't Make It In China, Can They Make It Anywhere?

When Chinese investors start turning their nose up at your industry, it's time for a reality check.