Paul Singer Ready, Willing, Maybe Able To Pull Plug On Warren Buffett’s $9 Billion Energy Deal

After what the Oracle said about activists, Paul Singer’s not inclined to give him a discounted 87th birthday gift.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

Practitioners of the academic and financial discipline of Buffettology were pretty underwhelmed by the Oracle of Omaha’s plans to become a modern-day Texas wildcatter, by which we mean his plan to spend $9 billion on the capital-intensive but steadily-returning business of delivering electricity to several million Texans. They are not alone. Paul Singer happens to know a thing or two about the company Buffett hopes to buy, Energy Future Holdings, as he is its largest creditor. And the Elliott Management founder’s none-too-impressed with Buffett’s offer, either. And he thinks he can do better. Only a little better, to be sure, but better all the same.

singer-apocalypse

Elliott Management, the largest creditor of the bankrupt parent of Oncor Electric Delivery Co, said it was putting together an offer that values the utility at about $18.5 billion, including debt….

Elliott, run by billionaire Paul Singer, said on Monday it was working on a $9.3 billion offer for Energy Future….

"We fear that the Berkshire transaction does not provide such value," the hedge fund said.

A battles royale go, it hardly gets better than this. The world’s most legendary investor vs. its most infamous activist investor, about whose strategy said most legendary investor (and his sidekick) had some pretty sharp words. A man nearing retirement planning for the world’s future by investing in stable, long-term infrastructure businesses vs. a man gleefully preparing for the investment opportunities offered up by Armageddon. A man best known for sharing DQ Blizzards with Bill Gates vs. a man best known for nailing a foreign head of state to the wall. Two billionaires in a clash for the ages over $300-$400 million.

Objectively speaking, of course, Singer’s planned bid does offer more value than Buffett’s, specifically those $300-$400 million. Of course, so did NextEra’s $9.5 billion deal last year. The only problem is, that was one of two bids over the past two years shot down by Texas energy regulators over the would-be buyers’ refusal to promise not to load Oncor down with even more debt. Berkshire Hathaway, by contrast, is quite a bit more regulator-friendly. The same, perhaps, cannot be said of Paul Singer or Elliott. But maybe they can pry an extra couple hundred million from Buffett’s $100 billion-and-growing pile of cash.

Elliott says considering $18.5 billion deal for Oncor [Reuters]

Related

singer-apocalypse

Paul Singer’s Black Knight Unhorses Warren Buffett

They said he couldn’t do it, but the Elliott Management chief found someone to outbid Berkshire. Someone other than himself.

singer-apocalypse

Paul Singer’s Greatest Challenge: Making Warren Buffett Angry

And angry enough to cough up a few hundred million more bucks for a bankrupt energy company.

singer-apocalypse

Paul Singer Ready To Treat Berkshire Hathaway Like Argentina

This thing’s only been going on for three years. Elliott Management has not even begun to fight.

Getty Images

Paul Singer For President

...says Paul Singer. Anybody but Trump or Hillary for this guy.

singer-apocalypse

Paul Singer Wasting No Time Turning Fresh $5B Into Someone Else’s Pain

Would Gigamon's management like to explain their company's recent troubles, or just quit before Paul Singer fires them?

singer-apocalypse

Paul Singer’s Still Got It

The hedge fund game's most talented Shade Queen is in fine form.

singer-apocalypse

Paul Singer Hiring For New Doomsday Bunker Office

When the global financial superpocalypse comes, Elliott Management will be ready. Won't you join them?