Don't Fuck With Jamie Dimon, Barclays Edition

You come at the king, you best not miss.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

Around this time last year, Jamie Dimon had a little problem. See, when Dimon's disciple Jes Staley opted to spread his fledgling wings and take off for Barclays a year earlier, Dimon could handle it. Watching your proteges depart is just a natural part of life at the top. But soon Staley was getting fresh. First he nabbed former JPMorgan colleague CS Venkatakrishnan as chief risk officer. Then Paul Compton came over as COO. Other followed.

JamieDimonKhaleesi

Then, shortly after the bank poached Tim Throsby, Barclays apparently had an abrupt change of heart:

In September 2016, a managing director at Barclays’ New York office sent an email — seen by the Financial Times — explaining that the two banks “have agreed to a 1-year ban on hiring any JPMC employee by Barclays” in key areas such as in corporate and investment banking.
The email, sent to more than 20 senior colleagues, goes on to say that following a review of pending offers by Barclays to JPMorgan staff, one “unfortunately will be pulled from Wealth UK”.

What happened in the interim? Did Staley suffer a sudden attack of humility? Not likely. Instead, it probably had something to do with his former boss:

Dimon was irked by the loss of such a promising exec, so soon after several other high-level poachings[...]. The brusque American phoned Barclays’ chairman John McFarlane to tell him the raids on his bank had to stop. Staley, meanwhile, called Daniel Pinto, JP’s investment bank head. An uneasy truce now reigns.

The hiring ban apparently ended within a week of when it began. But that hasn't stopped it from crawling back, as all things Barclays must, to haunt Jes Staley. From the FT:

The US Department of Justice has been examining whether Barclays promised JPMorgan that it would not hire its staff following several senior defections. No-poach agreements can be illegal under US antitrust laws.

Details are sparse, but the basic chronology seems to be this: Barclays shanghais a bunch of talent from JPMorgan; Dimon gets Staley on the horn and savages him; Barclays institutes its “ban”; Barclays un-institutes its “ban.”

Now, no one wants the Justice Department poking around. For JPMorgan, whether they explicitly suggested a no-poach agreement or not, this probe might end up being more of a headache than Barclays raiding its company roster was. But the headache is liable to be much bigger across the pond. If there's a lesson here, which is that you really, really don't want to fuck with Jamie Dimon.

Barclays’ email raises questions on banks’ ‘no-poach agreement’ [FT]

Related

JamieUSA

Jamie Dimon, Class Traitor

Dimon's message to fellow bankers: “I want to help lower-wage people more than I want to help you.”

JamieDimonKhaleesi

Jamie Dimon Will Raze 270 Park In Order To Build Something More Worthy Of Jamie Dimon

The Khaleesi of Wall Street is done gazing with envy at the palaces of his lessers.

JamieUSA

Jamie Dimon Is Too Big To Fail

It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of JPMorgan Chase.

Barclays.BaseballBat

Bonus Watch '17: Barclays I-Banking Thunderdome Edition

Instead of Christmas carols in the lobby, Barclays will be pumping "Let The Bodies Hit The Floor" on repeat this holiday season.

SecretaryMnuchin

Jamie Dimon May Not Have Become Treasury Secretary, But The Treasury Secretary Is Becoming Jamie Dimon

Steve Mnuchin just wrote a 147-page love-letter to his favorite bank CEO.

Jamie Dimon Just Made A Badass New Friend

"Come on, let Jamie tell you 'bout his neeeew frieeend."

JamieUSA

For A Guy Who Just Brought In $26B, Jamie Dimon Sure Hates America

The JPMorgan boss just lost his shit and somehow Mike Mayo has nothing to do with it.