Skip to main content

Mark Zuckerberg's Week Is Going From Nightmare To "Senator Warren Has A Question"

Mr. Zuck is (probably not really) going to Washington.
  • Author:
  • Updated:

If, for whatever reason (like say, if you're embroiled in an increasingly contentious legal battle with a porn star), you think you're having a bad week, just remember that it could be worse. You could be down $9 billion in two days, which is the situation Mark Zuckerberg now finds himself in as the fallout from the Cambridge Analytica fiasco continues to weigh on Facebook.


Just to be absolutely clear, this is rapidly morphing into a nightmare scenario for the company and reports about Cambridge Analytica's alleged use of "honey trapping" and Ukrainian prostitutes aren't helping.

Although everyone knew it was coming, news that the FTC is set to open a probe hit shares hard first thing Tuesday morning. “The FTC takes the allegations that the data of millions of people were used without proper authorization very seriously," Commissioner Terrell McSweeny said in statement, underscoring the idea that this ain't going away anytime soon.

Meanwhile, it looks like Zuckerberg is going to get himself a good "probing" from lawmakers as multiple committees are now on his ass. Here's a smattering of the headlines that have crossed since lunchtime on Tuesday:


Ol' Zuck has also been "invited" to the European Parliament. "Facebook needs to clarify before the representatives of 500 million Europeans that personal data is not being used to manipulate democracy,” the body's President Antonio Tajani said on Tuesday.

And it just goes on and on and on. These headlines are endless and they're still coming in. Particularly disconcerting for probably everyone involved (ill-intentioned or not) is the prospect of whistleblower Christopher Wylie granting an interview to House Intelligence Committee Democrats. And yes, that means he'll be speaking to Adam Schiff who is still beside himself after Devin Nunes shut down the committee's Russia probe earlier this month. Here's WaPo:

A lawyer for Christopher Wylie confirmed Tuesday that Wylie plans to accept the invitation from the committee’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.).

Schiff said Monday that panel Democrats want to talk to Wylie to determine where and how the Facebook data was stored and used, and whether others — including Russian operatives — had access to it.

“Indeed, it may be that through Cambridge Analytica, the Trump campaign made use of illegitimately-acquired data on millions of Americans to help sway the election,” Schiff said in a statement.

Clearly, that raises all kinds of questions about the direction this could go in, especially in light of what everyone already knows about how Facebook was manipulated for the purpose of spreading misinformation in the lead-up to the election.

Facebook shares are down some 11% already this week and while tech as a whole (i.e. the Nasdaq) is digesting it reasonably well on Tuesday, Twitter is getting hit hard in a further testament to the notion that this could be a veritable Pandora's box.

For her part, Height Capital's Stefanie Miller is going so far as to suggest that "pressure from federal lawmakers may be the precipitating event that turns investors away from these companies"

That sentiment has been echoed in one form or another by others over the past 24 hours including Nomura who wrote the following in a note that's getting quite a bit of attention:

The perception of the accuracy and use of the data are being questioned Part of the explosion in the use of these platforms was the disruption of the conventional distribution and verification of information. Before social media, information was distributed and verified by particular institutions such as press/media companies, universities and government bodies. Today thanks to the increasing concerns that platforms and data-holders have been “gamed” by corporations and foreign governments to manipulate consumers and voters, there is a growing backlash from individuals and governments on how these platforms can operate.

Whether or not this marks some kind of turning point for these companies is obviously debatable, but it's entirely fair to say that the narrative has shifted dramatically over the past 72 hours.

Meanwhile, the massive influx of cash into QQQ last week came pouring back out on Monday, suggesting that flows into and out of everyone's second-favorite retail benchmark tracking vehicle could end up exacerbating swings should things get any worse for the index heavyweights. And please, spare me your bullshit excuses about how ETFs and ETF flows don't pose a risk, because at this point everyone knows they do.

I wish there was a way to make this funnier (and there will undoubtedly be all manner of punchlines over the next couple of weeks as this plays out), but for the time being it just seems bad all the way around.

I'd be remiss if I didn't note the obvious here which is that this has the potential to add further fuel to the raging dumpster fire at 1600 Penn. in the event these Congressional committees stumble on new evidence of election fuckery.

Have a great afternoon and remember, at least you haven't lost $9 billion in the last 48 hours.



Facebook Indicating To Congress That It Has Unprecedentedly Enormous Balls

Even Jamie Dimon wouldn't tell the Senate Intel Committee that he's too busy for a chat.

Screen Shot 2017-09-20 at 5.17.24 PM

Sheryl Sandberg Leans In To Take Public Beating On Mark Zuckerberg's Behalf

Facebook's fuck-up is on Sheryl because The Zuck is woke now.

What If Mark Zuckerberg Wore A 3-Piece Suit And A Monocle To The Facebook Roadshow?

What if Mark Zuckerberg wore cutoff jean shorts and a mesh Hawaii 69 football jersey to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a Mr. Peanut costume to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a tuxedo tee-shirt to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg dressed as Robocop for the IPO roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore Crocs to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg entered the roadshow as a member of the Lollipop Guild? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore Capri pants to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a wetsuit to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore a Lacoste polo with an argyle sweater wrapped around his neck to the Facebook roadshow? What if Mark Zuckerberg wore the Hannibal Lechter mask from Silence of the Lambs to the Facebook roadshow? Would things have turned out differently? If Zuckerberg had left the hoodie at home? One guy says yes. "I felt that had Mr. Zuckerberg worn a jacket instead of a hoodie (showing them that he respected them enough to "dress up"), he would have made a statement to them that he cares about their needs, and will act in their best interest. He chose not to make that statement, and the current share price demonstrates that investors have chosen not to support Facebook shares. All of this is iterative. Had Facebook issued 10 million shares instead of 421 million, the stock would probably be much higher. However, had Mr. Zuckerberg worn a jacket and reassured investors that he is aligned with their expectations, perhaps more people would be stepping in to buy now." So...yeah.