Skip to main content

Traders Express Mild Skepticism Toward Bank’s Closing-Price Altruism

The nerve of these people.
  • Author:
  • Updated:
Uh, where is everybody? where did they go? this is a long caption. really long. does it wrap? By Kevin Hutchinson (Flickr) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

By Kevin Hutchinson (Flickr) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

With the rise of index-based investing, many more traders found themselves with the need to offload or acquire many more shares of many more companies precisely at 4 p.m. each trading day, so as to achieve their goal of matching their underlying indices, which between the hours of 4 p.m. and 9:30 a.m. sit motionless at the number. Indices, of course, have that luxury, because they don’t actually own any of their constituents stocks. Index funds, on the other hand, have to scramble. This created rather a lucrative market for stock exchanges, since they run those closing-bell auctions, and they knew it. So they started raising prices.

Now, the banks routing them these trades didn’t like that one bit. After all, it was bad for their customers. Well, these paragons of the public trust and stewards of fair play decided to do something about it: Make the trades themselves. After all, they had these great and not-at-all-suspect dark pools to do the work in. Yes, it would make them a few extra bucks doing so, but don’t be crass: This was about helping the little guy, like Vanguard and BlackRock, avoid getting gouged by the bourses. How dare you even begin to impute an underlying profit motive to the likes of Goldman Sachs.

Oh, wait, you are imputing such? In fact, you’re coming out and saying maybe this isn’t such a great thing in all sorts of ways? For shame.

Some clients are wary. “To me, it’s a black box,” said Mehmet Kinak, global head of systematic trading and market structure at T. Rowe Price Group Inc. He said T. Rowe, which manages $1.04 trillion, avoids guaranteed-close trading because it is “completely nontransparent….”

In an agreement that it asked one prospective client to sign, Goldman acknowledges that efforts to execute the trade while protecting itself from adverse price moves “may impact market prices” in ways that are unfavorable to its clients, according to a copy reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

“I know I’m getting the closing price,” said Mr. Kinak, of T. Rowe. “But I don’t know that it’s the best price I could have achieved.”

Goldman Cashes In on Passive-Investing Boom With Big 4 P.M. Trade [WSJ]


Barclays Would Rather Part With Eight Figures Than Explain Dark Pools To Simpletons

Simple math proves that it's worth $150 million to avoid even a brief chat with Eric Schneiderman.


D.J. D-Sol Working On Cutting Dis Track About His Own Commodities Traders

The Goldman chief is preparing to take out his frustrations upon them.

Uh, where is everybody? where did they go? this is a long caption. really long. does it wrap? By Kevin Hutchinson (Flickr) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Stock Exchanges Don’t Have To Do Thing They Very Much Don’t Want To At Their Own Expense

If the SEC wants to know how rebates impact stock trading, they’ll have to figure it out themselves.

Goldman Sachs Balds 2

Newly-Woke Goldman Sachs Takes Next Logical Minimal Step Towards Diversity

If you board has as many penises as members, you can take your IPO elsewhere.