Skip to main content

The wheels of American justice turn slowly, inefficiently and ponderously, if at all. While this feature is often maddening to foreign companies used to their own more favorable and less predictable systems, it was certainly welcome to LVMH when it called off its plan to spend $16 billion on Tiffany & Co. earlier this month. After all, the unwanted deal was set to close on Nov. 24 and its antitrust clearance was due to expire on Feb. 3, and surely no American court could adjudicate such a complicated matter in so short a time. Why, LVMH was confident that the discovery and depositions alone would take well into next year, really rendering the whole thing moot, if you think about it.

Well, Delaware Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights III has thought about it. And while getting ready for a trial in the time it took to strike the deal in the first place—a month—was plainly impossible, one thing would become clearer sooner, specifically whether LVMH’s reason for abandoning its agreement with Tiffany, the Franco-American trade war set to break out on Jan. 6, would actually occur, and whether it will last longer than two weeks. So why not have everyone get together in a Wilmington court room (pandemic permitting) with some popcorn and see if the fireworks go off.

“We appreciate the court’s ruling today to expedite the process,” said Tiffany Chairman Roger Farah. “A trial on Jan. 5, 2021, will hopefully lead to a ruling prior to the expiration of U.S. antitrust clearance on Feb. 3, 2021, and enable us to protect our company and our shareholders.”

Still, the next two months are going to suck big-time for Tiffany’s if it’s going to avoid giving LVMH other reasons for junking the marriage.

Tiffany’s capital expenditures are capped until the deal’s closing date and the agreement doesn’t stipulate a budget for next year. Its shares outstanding are also capped, meaning a delay would prevent it from paying equity compensation to employees at year-end.

Moreover, Tiffany can’t hire or fire employees at the level of vice president or above or enter into material contracts, including the signing of store leases, without LVMH’s consent.

Tiffany, LVMH Trial Set for Early January [WSJ]


tiffany ring

French Foreign Minister Calls LVMH A Liar

Whether that means it has to buy Tiffany is now for a court to decide.

Former AIG CEO Hank Greenberg (Getty Images)

Judge Tosses Hank Greenberg’s Lawsuit Against Eliot Spitzer, Insults Him To His Face

The former AIG CEO is too blinded by hatred and rage to see any similarities between himself and the libidinous former governor.


Robinhood Has A Couple Of Teensy Things To Get Off Its Chest Before Tomorrow’s IPO

We’re sure you’ll agree with it that probes into potential insider-trading and whether its CEO should be allowed to be its CEO are nothing to worry about.

Quit hiding behind the bench. By Phil Roeder (Flickr: Supreme Court of the United States) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court To Decide If Banks Really Need To Be The Things They Say They Are

Supreme Court To Decide If Banks Really Need To Be The Things They Say They Are Dek: Honesty


Pay No Attention To How Much SPACs Are Padding Law Firms’ Bottom Lines

This is a matter of principle, they say without trace of irony.

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Ex-Hedge Fund Manager Better Hope The Next Judge He Sees Doesn’t Think He’s A Thief And A Liar

Because that judge will be the one fulfilling his prophecy about going to jail.