Here’s the thing about some of the metrics that companies make up to paint more flattering pictures of themselves: Insofar as they do not meet generally accepted accounting principles, they are made up, and as long as they are emblazoned with the scarlet letters “non-GAAP,” this is perfectly OK. And here’s the thing about manipulating such a number to make it even more favorable: If the people looking at it understand precisely how you are “manipulating” it, then it’s not manipulation, at least in a legal sense.

These are the things that prosecutors wish they had considered more fully back when they charged the CEO and CFO of a REIT with manipulating something they called “same-property net operating income” back in 2019.

The government’s claims were undercut by the fact that securities analysts and company auditors understood how Brixmor calculated its earnings metrics, said Peter Neiman, a partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, which represented [Brixmore Property Group CEO Michael] Carroll along with Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.

“The government’s charges were contrary to the conclusions of both Big Four accounting firms that reviewed the relevant financial statements, and related to tiny alleged errors in a metric with no fixed definition under GAAP that Brixmor warned was not a substitute for its reported GAAP earnings,” Mr. Neiman said.

Prosecutors Drop Accounting Fraud Case Against Former Brixmor Executives [WSJ]

Related

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Judges Say Prosecutors Can Spoof Spoofing Probes

At least, they say no one can question whether they’re doing it, which is just as good.

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Racketeering Apparently Easier To Prove Than Spoofing

At least, federal prosecutors hope it is.

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Citigroup Stupid Beyond Belief Legally Speaking, Can’t Have Its Half-Billion Dollars Back

Finders keepers is apparently a genuine precedent under New York State law.

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

If It Takes Seven Years To Build A Simple Bribery Case, It’s Probably Not Worth It

The only bankers to face a British jury over financial crisis shenanigans walk free.

edits

Prosecutors Sorry About Sending Defense Only A First Draft, Would Like To Keep Their Convictions, Please

Sure, the final version was way more damning to the hedge fund managers it helped send to jail, but, like, pretty please?

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Ex-Hedge Fund Manager Better Hope The Next Judge He Sees Doesn’t Think He’s A Thief And A Liar

Because that judge will be the one fulfilling his prophecy about going to jail.