The House of Representatives yesterday passed what might seem to be a pretty substantial piece of legislation. Offered by Rep. Jim Himes (D-Hedge Funds), the bill would categorically make insider-trading illegal. Any person in possession of wrongfully-obtained non-public information that could reasonably be expected to impact a stock’s price would be guilty of the crime, whether or not she knew that the information was revealed in exchange for a “direct or indirect personal benefit,” on in contravention of some fiduciary duty, or by hacking or lying or whatever.

This potentially revolutionary action was waved through without much fuss. Why? Well, because, as it happens, insider-trading is still illegal, if not quite as illegal as it used to be, and also because, just like the last attempt to illegalize this already illegal thing, it’s probably going nowhere, and—oh yea—it’s not all that revolutionary.

John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, said on Tuesday that the language limits the bill's value by allowing Wall Street traders to exchange information on the expectation of future favors and viewed it as unlikely to gain traction in a Democratic-controlled Senate.

Nice try, though, guys. Maybe you’ll get this cracked nut figured out next time.

U.S House passes insider trading bill [Reuters]

Related

capitol2

House Bill Invents Insider Trading, Bans It

This may seem an unnecessary bit of legislative masturbation, but it’s not!

ronlivingston

Office Space: Insider Trading

The downtrodden of a Silicon Valley IT department get their revenge. Briefly.

wirecard

German Regulators More Focused On Doing Insider Trading Than Stopping Insider Trading

Turning one of your own in to prosecutors after years of doing the same to Wirecard skeptics is not a great look for BaFin.