In considering whether Andrew Ross Sorkin & co. got a little too copy-paste-y in conjuring the character of hedge fund performance coach/dominatrix Wendy Rhoades, U.S. District Judge George Daniels may not have subjected himself to all 55 soapy, interminable hours of Showtime’s “Billions.” Well, federal appeals court judges Debra Ann Livingston, Robert Sack and Denny Chin did, and it turns out you don’t have to watch the unwatchable to know that being a woman and having a job, even in that combination, are (as they strongly suspected) not copyrightable, even if the fictitious character in question is wearing your clothes.

"Even assuming that the district court erred in consulting the internet," Daniels correctly dismissed the copyright claims because the works weren't similar, the panel said.

"The plot of Market Mind Games, to the extent there is one, is wholly dissimilar from that of Billions," the panel, comprised of Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Debra Ann Livingston and U.S. Circuit Judges Robert Sack and Denny Chin, said. "Likewise, the similarities that exist between Dr. Rhoades in Billions and the fictional version of [Denise] Shull in Market Mind Games — namely their gender and occupation — are generalized and non-protectible."

And, what’s more, they don’t want any judge to have to go through what they did—watching “Billions” ever again.

The court also blocked Shull from amending her complaint to add a false endorsement claim. Shull couldn't show the consumer confusion necessary for such a claim, the court said, based on differences between her character and Dr. Rhoades.

Luckily for Shull, however, there’s a higher legal authority than the Second Circuit Court of Appeals that’s not quite as interested in boring questions about whether two similarly-dressed women are similar enough to copyright.

Shull's attorney Avram Turkel of Borstein Turkel said Shull was disappointed in the decision, and that the "court of actual public opinion" recognizes that "Billions" is substantially similar to her work.

2nd Circ. OKs Showtime's win against consultant's 'Billions' copyright claims [Reuters]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.

Related

billions

It Doesn’t Look Like There Will Be A Second Season Of ‘Billions’ Wardrobe Drama

It’s never good when a federal judge cuts your lawyer off with, “That’s enough.”

billions

‘Billions’ Now Accused Of Closet Infringement

The real-life Wendy Rhoades is only a dominatrix in the courtroom.

billions

‘Billions’-Based Courtroom Costume Drama To Return Long Before ‘Billions’

Shull v. Sorkin is coming back to a courtroom near you (if you live in Manhattan), and to a livestream for everyone else.

billions

‘Billions’ Judge Is Clearly No Clotheshound

Closet infringement or no, this case is closed.

billions

If 'Billions' Hadn't Made The Character She Inspired A Dominatrix, Maybe Denise Shull Wouldn't Have Sued Them

Denise Shull sued 'Billions' on a variety of claims arising in IP. Here are her thoughts.

billions

There's One Thing 'Billions' Gets Right

While her case proved unsuccessful, she has graciously offered to discuss her experiences and frustrations with the litigation process.

lehman-sept-15

Court Vindicates Dick Fuld’s CDO Flip Clauses

Da Bros don’t always wins, but they win enough.

billions

‘Billions’ Gets A Dozen More Chances To Mess With Local Hedge Fund Performance Coach

Denise Shull can’t shake her fictionalized self next year—or the year after.