Special-purpose acquisition companies are under siege on a bewildering variety of legal and regulatory fronts, most recently in the form of three lawsuits declaring them outright illegal. Well, this is a step too far for the blank checks and the law firms handsomely profiting from them.

Kirkland & Ellis, one of the top legal advisers to SPACs, helped to organize other firms to issue the statement, which said the lawsuits are “without factual or legal basis.” Some who signed on, like Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, have comparatively little involvement with SPACs. They are protesting on principle, organizers said. “The market has already driven some reform,” said Christian Nagler of Kirkland & Ellis. “Otherwise it should be done by proposing rules and laws, not by lawsuits….”

“We really needed something powerful to take away that P.R. narrative,” said Joel Rubinstein of White & Case. Of course, the law firms defending SPACs are protecting millions of dollars in legal fees, as well as principles.

Of course, it may be too little, too late: Bill Ackman may agree that these lawsuits are total garbage, but he also knows that even total garbage can gum up the American legal system for well over the two years most SPACs have to find a partner. Therefore, win or lose in court, these lawsuits masterminded by a pair of prominent law professors, have already, in effect, won, especially coming, as they do, at a time when some other aspects of the blank-check project are getting a rather unpleasant once-over.

In such an environment, what is the enterprising company desiring a public listing without the hassle of a traditional initial public offering to do? Well, here’s an option:

The still relatively small group of companies that have made their debuts on U.S. exchanges through direct listings have, on average, outperformed the S&P 500 and a key broader index for initial public offerings during the same period, according to an analysis by University of Florida finance professor Jay Ritter…. In general, companies that choose this route tend to be in solid financial shape because they don’t need to raise capital through a traditional IPO.

Oh, just kidding: Those words don’t describe any company willing to even think about getting into bed with a blank-check vehicle.

A SPAC Counterattack [DealBook]
Direct Listings Have Paid Off for Investors So Far [WSJ]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.

Related

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Lawsuits Against SPACs Have Shocking Only Tripled

Given the roughly 150 SPAC merger deals over the last 20 months, we figure there should be roughly 150 of them.

Bill ackman beach

SPAC Turned SPARC Turned SPAC Again Sued

Bill Ackman thought about doing something, and therefore is illegal.

Getty Images

Flashy Global Law Firm Accused Of Bilking Trusting Nebraska Senior Citizen

Warren Buffett’s got a bone to pick with Jones Day.

ackman-gorton3

You Know, Actually, SPACs Are Stupid And Bill Ackman Doesn’t Want To Run One Anyway

But he’s had a SPARC of inspiration, however many months too late.

forbes

SPACs May Be Illegal, So Make The Most Of Them While You Can

Time to cut a deal before a judge calls time on the whole party, although that’s probably not going to happen.

Getty Images

Bill Ackman Having None Of This Cockamamie SPAC Lawsuit

Do you see any stocks in Pershing Square Tontine’s portfolio? He didn’t think so.