The appeal of the blank-check company to its sponsors is blindingly obvious: free money! The appeal to the real companies merging with them also seems fairly clear: They get to go public—freeing the executives who started them and the early investors who backed them to cash out in whole or in part—with a group—the aforementioned sponsors—who are somewhat less fastidious about things like revenue or growth, on account of the free money they get simply for consummating a deal. The investors may retrospectively dislike it, but by then their only recourse is to litigation, which in a very real sense means they’ve already lost. But that appeal is contingent on the company at hand getting the money sitting in the SPAC at the closure of the deal, and that, it seems, is no sure thing.

According to Spacresearch.com data I analyzed, the median redemption rate for North American SPAC deals completed in July was almost 50%. In several recent deals, more than 90% of shares were redeemed…./The problem stems from a couple of unique aspects of SPACs. First, investors can vote in favor of a deal yet still demand their money back. So a deal can proceed even though a majority of stockholders aren’t prepared to financially support it.

Second, the risk-averse arbitrage hedge funds who buy SPAC shares at the time of the initial IPO often have no intention of funding it past merger completion — they either sell if the stock is above $10, or they redeem. It requires careful marketing of the deal to replace them with more long-term orientated stockholders. Many SPACs sponsors are flunking that test….

Though sponsors are increasingly having to offer concessions — for example, by linking some of their compensation to post-merger share price performance — there usually aren’t adjustments to their pay for failing to deliver the cash they promised. Typically they receive 20% of the blank check firm shares for free, meaning they can make money even when other shareholders don’t.

Nice work if you can get it. Oh, anyone can? Great.

Hedge Funds Are Demanding Their SPAC Money Back [Bloomberg]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.

Related

deliveroo

Maybe SPAC’s Shouldn’t Just Be A Cash Machine For Sponsors?

You’re not gonna like it, but given how things are going for blank-check companies, IPOs, and NFTs, hear ARS out.

Bill ackman beach

SPAC Turned SPARC Turned SPAC Again Sued

Bill Ackman thought about doing something, and therefore is illegal.

ourobouros

Behold: The Most Incestuous SPAC Deal Yet

We move a step closer to the inevitable SPAC merging with itself.

shaq

Shaquille O’Neal Is Taking WeWork Public Via SPAC And Other Tales Of Finance In 2021

Like another company going public via SPAC giving you access to the IPOs it’s choosing to shun.

ackman-gorton3

You Know, Actually, SPACs Are Stupid And Bill Ackman Doesn’t Want To Run One Anyway

But he’s had a SPARC of inspiration, however many months too late.

ourobouros

SPAC To Merge With SPAC That Merged With Spinoff From Company The First SPAC Is Merging With

This may be the first SPAC to essentially merge with itself, but it will most assuredly not be the last.

Getty Images

Too Big To SPAC

The SPAC is dead! Long live the SPARC!