Skip to main content

Last month, Gary Gensler said his Securities and Exchange Commission was taking a long, hard look at payment for order flow. He went so far as to call that system, by which the likes of Robinhood, E*Trade Securities and others get paid to direct customer trades to Citadel Securities and others, “an inherent conflict of interest.”

Given Gensler’s hyperactive regulatory imagination and appetite, that certainly sounds bad for the future of PFOF, and with it, four out of every five dollars say, Robinhood makes. Not so, says Dan Gallagher. According to Robinhood’s chief legal officer, once the terrifically uninformed Gensler learns about the amazing practice that incidentally happens to be crucial for the success of his business, he’s not only not going to ban PFOF—he’s going to put it in the Constitution.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is “going to arrive at the conclusion that payment for order flow is undoubtedly an amazingly good thing for retail investors and they’re not going to ban it,” Robinhood’s Dan Gallagher told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Monday…. “At Robinhood, [payment for order flow] is the life blood of a no commission, no minimum balance brokerage. This is what has brought in a whole new generation of investors,” added Gallagher. “I think that the overwhelming evidence is that the current market structure works well for retail investors.”

It's true: We’re sure Gensler completely missed that whole GameStop thing while he was putting together President Biden’s financial services regulation team and getting ready to nominate himself to lead the SEC.

“The notion that our customers are stupid, that they need protection, that they need the government and the nanny state to come out and save them for making bad decisions, I think they’re insulted,” said Gallagher.

Yea, it’s definitely their intelligence being insulted, and not that of the veteran regulator, MIT Sloan professor and one of the youngest Goldman Sachs partners ever.

Robinhood’s chief legal officer says the SEC won’t ban payment for order flow [CNBC]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.



Robinhood May Lose 81% Of Its Revenue, Still Going Public Anyway

No payment for order flow? No problem for this merry band of troublemakers.


SEC Would Not Bold As To Just Outright Kill Payment For Order Flow

It’s just going to smother it with regulations.

By US government [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

‘Wait, Senator, Don’t You Want To Hear About This Mug Who Said He Had An AI Supercomputer In His Mom’s Basement?’

Selections from the cutting-room floor of Gary Gensler’s Senate Banking Committee testimony.

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Robinhood Gets Some Good News Vis-à-Vis Getting Sued

TD Ameritrade can’t be hit with a class-action over payment for order flow, so the little app that sometimes couldn’t probably can’t, either.