Skip to main content

Yesterday, we learned that dangerous falsehood and eye-watering mundanity platform Twitter made one shareholder very angry when it sold a pretty sweet convertible bond to raise $1 billion it didn’t need, all apparently to appease Elliott Management’s Paul Singer and save the jobs of founder Jack Dorsey and all of its board members, and all allegedly in contravention of the company’s fiduciary duties to that and other shareholders. Of course, shareholder lawsuits are nearly as common as humblebrags on Twitter, but the snowflakes there can’t seem to deal with more than one at a time.

The shareholder action claimed Twitter misled investors about two closely tracked metrics: monthly active users, a measure of the total number of users on its platform; and timeline views, a measure of how frequently users interacted with the platform.

Twitter said it would pay $809.5 million under the binding agreement to settle claims alleging securities law violations, adding that it continues to deny any wrongdoing or improper actions.

The company said it would use cash on hand to fund the settlement….

See? That billion from Silver Lake really will come in handy, especially if you ignore all of the other billions Twitter has sitting in the bank.

Twitter to Pay $809.5 Million to Settle Securities Suit [WSJ]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.

Related

twitter login

Actually Twitter’s Pretty Happy To Not Be Owned By Elon Musk

If there were any doubt about it, here’s a poison pill the company’s got between its teeth, ready to bite down should Musk place any large orders.

Getty Images

Black Mortgage Applicants Do About As Well As Black Job Applicants At Wells Fargo

They’re apparently not as “qualified” as their white co-applicants, either.

Quit hiding behind the bench. By Phil Roeder (Flickr: Supreme Court of the United States) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court To Decide If Banks Really Need To Be The Things They Say They Are

Supreme Court To Decide If Banks Really Need To Be The Things They Say They Are Dek: Honesty

twitter login

Ohio Man Accused Of Using Twitter For Nefarious Purposes

Penny-stock pump-and-dumps on popular social media platform? Who could have foreseen such a thing!

By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Short Seller To Refund Company He Slammed And, More Painfully, Apologize

The only way to prove you really mean it when calling a short seller a liar is to sue and win.

zuck

Is ‘Protecting The Reputation Of The Founder-CEO’ Not An Acceptable Ten-Figure Line Item?

Should they not have done that? I tell you, big tech’s gotta plead ignorance on this thing.