Skip to main content

If there is anything that Wells Fargo does well, it’s manipulating matters to its advantage at the expense of its customers. And if there are any things that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority does well, it is turning a benign if not outright blind eye to such machinations, and barring that selectively editing to the benefit of the folks paying its bills.

In the matter of one customer’s claim related to another of Wells strengths—specifically, fucking up at the expense of its customers—a Georgia judge can’t help but notice all of these proclivities coming to the fore.

Brian Leggett and Bryson Holdings LLC brought the case against Wells Fargo after losing some $1.2 million on a merger arbitrage investment strategy executed by a broker there in 2015 and 2016. The arbitrators ultimately decided in Wells Fargo’s favor…. Finra for years has used a computer system to randomly generate a neutral list of potential arbitrators from which the parties agree on three to decide the case. But in this case, multiple names were removed from the list at the request of Wells Fargo’s lawyer and with the permission of Finra, according to the judge’s decision.

“Permitting one lawyer to secretly red line the neutral list makes the list anything but neutral, and calls into question the entire fairness of the arbitral forum,” Judge Edwards wrote.

To which Wells and FINRA might rightly note that fairness is not the point of arbitration, but that probably wouldn’t go over terribly well with Judge Edwards. In which case the only available course of action is to deny everything and hope that no one takes too close a look at things. And if only that were all, because apparently even an unlevel playing field wasn’t enough to make Wells confident it’d win.

At one point, the arbitration stopped due to a medical emergency. When it resumed, the broker who had been testifying provided different answers than before the break, and the bank’s attorney misrepresented the prior testimony, according to the judge’s decision. “Wells Fargo and its counsel committed fraud,” she said.

Wells Fargo Gamed System in Investor Arbitration, Judge Says [WSJ]

For more of the latest in litigation, regulation, deals and financial services trends, sign up for Finance Docket, a partnership between Breaking Media publications Above the Law and Dealbreaker.

Related

Wells Fargo.Insane

Wells Fargo Would Like To Keep Its Rigged Arbitration Victory, Please

I mean, a little panel-tampering and light perjury can’t possibly render one of those things moot, right?

Wells Fargo.Insane

Wells Fargo Employees Still Know How To (Fraudulently) Gussy Up An Application

And like some of their bad apple brethren are thusly former Wells Fargo employees now.

Wells Fargo.Insane

Wells Fargo Employees Tell John Stumpf That "We Learned It From Watching You, Dad"

This "A few 5,300 bad apples ruined the bunch" defense is not holding up too well.

westpac.jfif

Meet The Australian Wells Fargo

Westpac even (allegedly) conjured a scheme that eluded Wells’ most enterprising fraudsters.

Wells Fargo.Insane

How Many Accounts Does Wells Fargo Actually Have?

Is anyone willing to vouch for more than a few dozen?

Getty Images

Black Mortgage Applicants Do About As Well As Black Job Applicants At Wells Fargo

They’re apparently not as “qualified” as their white co-applicants, either.